%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU162+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:50 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.04s 2.71s
% Output : Refutation 4.04s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 7 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 103 ( 14 ~; 0 |; 4 &; 72 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 ^; 26 !; 4 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(set_difference_decl,type,
set_difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_decl,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(disjoint_decl,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A )
<=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A )
<=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(10,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A ) )
& ( ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l28_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(29,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
<=> ( ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t83_xboole_1) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A )
=> ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l25_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(27,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(45,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,25,20,29,32,34,22,27]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU162+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.39 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:40:39 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.40 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.30/1.24 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.67/1.46 % [INFO] Parsing done (217ms).
% 1.67/1.48 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.45/1.94 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.45/1.95 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.70/2.05 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.70/2.09 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.70/2.10 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.70/2.11 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.70/2.11 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.04/2.71 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.04/2.71 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.04/2.71 % Time passed: 2100ms (effective reasoning time: 1217ms)
% 4.04/2.71 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.04/2.71 % Axioms used in derivation (7): l25_zfmisc_1, rc1_xboole_0, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, t83_xboole_1, l28_zfmisc_1
% 4.04/2.71 % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 4.04/2.71 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2100 ms resp. 1217 ms w/o parsing
% 4.04/2.76 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.04/2.76 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------