↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU163+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.51s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (  10   ~;   4   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn  13   !;   2   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f45,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
     => subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l50_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f92,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
     => subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t92_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f93,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( in(X0,X1)
       => subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f92]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
      & ~ subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ( in(sK21,sK22)
    & ~ subset(sK21,union(sK22)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK21,sK22]),skolemize(X0,sK21),skolemize(X1,sK22)],[f142]) ).

fof(f284,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    in(sK21,sK22),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f201]) ).

fof(f347,plain,
    ~ subset(sK21,union(sK22)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f201]) ).

tcf(c_130,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,union(X1))
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f284]) ).

tcf(c_190,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK21,union(sK22)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

tcf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK21,sK22),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f346]) ).

tcf(c_3186,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = union(sK22),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_3187,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK21,sK22),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_191]) ).

tcf(c_3188,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK21,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_190,c_3186]) ).

tcf(c_5455,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ in(X0,sK22) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3186,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_5469,plain,
    subset(sK21,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3187,c_5455]) ).

tcf(c_5470,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5469,c_3188]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU163+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:00:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.42  % Proving...
% 2.51/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.51/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.51/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 5  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % 
% 2.51/1.28  % clauses                               126
% 2.51/1.28  % conjectures                           2
% 2.51/1.28  % EPR                                   23
% 2.51/1.28  % Horn                                  97
% 2.51/1.28  % unary                                 27
% 2.51/1.28  % binary                                55
% 2.51/1.28  % lits                                  276
% 2.51/1.28  % lits eq                               81
% 2.51/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.51/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.51/1.28  % fd_cond                               3
% 2.51/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        35
% 2.51/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.51/1.28  % Current options:
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.51/1.28  % 
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.51/1.28  
% 2.51/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------