↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU167+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.43s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU167+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 19:50:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.43  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS derived 5 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 11 clauses.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS allocated 85127 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 10 :
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.43  1[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc7,skc6)*r.
% 0.19/0.43  2[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc4,skc5)*l.
% 0.19/0.43  4[0:Inp] || subset(cartesian_product2(skc7,skc4),cartesian_product2(skc6,skc5))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.43  5[0:Inp] || subset(u,v) -> subset(cartesian_product2(u,w),cartesian_product2(v,w))*.
% 0.19/0.43  6[0:Inp] || subset(u,v) -> subset(cartesian_product2(w,u),cartesian_product2(w,v))*.
% 0.19/0.43  7[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> subset(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.43  8[0:Res:2.0,6.0] ||  -> subset(cartesian_product2(u,skc4),cartesian_product2(u,skc5))*l.
% 0.19/0.43  11[0:Res:1.0,5.0] ||  -> subset(cartesian_product2(skc7,u),cartesian_product2(skc6,u))*r.
% 0.19/0.43  12[0:NCh:7.2,7.1,4.0,11.0] || subset(cartesian_product2(skc7,skc4),cartesian_product2(skc7,skc5))*l -> .
% 0.19/0.43  13[0:MRR:12.0,8.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.43  Formulae used in the proof : t119_zfmisc_1 t118_zfmisc_1 t1_xboole_1
% 0.19/0.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------