↑ Up

Otter---3.3.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU169+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:15:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.72s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 1.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   9 unt;   1 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   2 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( A != powerset(B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | subset(C,B) ),
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( empty(A)
    | ~ element(B,A)
    | in(B,A) ),
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | in(C,B) ),
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ~ empty(powerset(A)),
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ~ in(dollar_c1,dollar_c3),
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    element(dollar_c2,powerset(dollar_c3)),
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    in(dollar_c1,dollar_c2),
    file('SEU169+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    in(dollar_c2,powerset(dollar_c3)),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[26,5]),11]),
    [iquote('hyper,26,5,unit_del,11')] ).

cnf(89,plain,
    subset(dollar_c2,dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[74,2,21]),
    [iquote('hyper,74,2,21')] ).

cnf(115,plain,
    in(dollar_c1,dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[89,9,27]),
    [iquote('hyper,89,9,27')] ).

cnf(116,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[115,12]),
    [iquote('binary,115.1,12.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU169+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:55:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.72/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.72/1.92  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 1.72/1.92  Wed Jul 27 06:55:33 2022
% 1.72/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 22477.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.72/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.72/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  formula_list(usable).
% 1.72/1.92  all A (A=A).
% 1.72/1.92  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.72/1.92  all A B (B=powerset(A)<-> (all C (in(C,B)<->subset(C,A)))).
% 1.72/1.92  all A B ((-empty(A)-> (element(B,A)<->in(B,A)))& (empty(A)-> (element(B,A)<->empty(B)))).
% 1.72/1.92  all A B (subset(A,B)<-> (all C (in(C,A)->in(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.92  $T.
% 1.72/1.92  $T.
% 1.72/1.92  $T.
% 1.72/1.92  all A exists B element(B,A).
% 1.72/1.92  all A (-empty(powerset(A))).
% 1.72/1.92  empty(empty_set).
% 1.72/1.92  -(all A B (element(B,powerset(A))-> (all C (in(C,B)->in(C,A))))).
% 1.72/1.92  all A (-empty(A)-> (exists B (element(B,powerset(A))& -empty(B)))).
% 1.72/1.92  exists A empty(A).
% 1.72/1.92  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.72/1.92  all A B subset(A,A).
% 1.72/1.92  all A (empty(A)->A=empty_set).
% 1.72/1.92  all A B (-(in(A,B)&empty(B))).
% 1.72/1.92  all A B (-(empty(A)&A!=B&empty(B))).
% 1.72/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] B!=powerset(A)| -in(C,B)|subset(C,A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] B!=powerset(A)|in(C,B)| -subset(C,A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] B=powerset(A)|in($f1(A,B),B)|subset($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] B=powerset(A)| -in($f1(A,B),B)| -subset($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] empty(A)| -element(B,A)|in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] empty(A)|element(B,A)| -in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)| -element(B,A)|empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|element(B,A)| -empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] subset(A,B)|in($f2(A,B),A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f2(A,B),B).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] element($f3(A),A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -empty(powerset(A)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] element($c2,powerset($c3)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] in($c1,$c2).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -in($c1,$c3).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] empty(A)|element($f4(A),powerset(A)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] empty(A)| -empty($f4(A)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] empty($c4).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -empty($c5).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.72/1.92  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.72/1.92  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.72/1.92  clauses in usable.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] A!=powerset(B)| -in(C,A)|subset(C,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] A!=powerset(B)|in(C,A)| -subset(C,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 4 [] A=powerset(B)| -in($f1(B,A),A)| -subset($f1(B,A),B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 5 [] empty(A)| -element(B,A)|in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 6 [] empty(A)|element(B,A)| -in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 7 [] -empty(A)| -element(B,A)|empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 8 [] -empty(A)|element(B,A)| -empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 9 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 10 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f2(A,B),B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] -empty(powerset(A)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] -in($c1,$c3).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 13 [] empty(A)| -empty($f4(A)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] -empty($c5).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 15 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 16 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 17 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process sos:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 21 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 22 [] A=powerset(B)|in($f1(B,A),A)|subset($f1(B,A),B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 23 [] subset(A,B)|in($f2(A,B),A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 24 [] element($f3(A),A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 25 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 26 [] element($c2,powerset($c3)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 27 [] in($c1,$c2).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 28 [] empty(A)|element($f4(A),powerset(A)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 29 [] empty($c4).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 30 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.72/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  21 back subsumes 20.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 116 [binary,115.1,12.1] $F.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.72/1.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.72/1.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.72/1.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ============ end of search ============
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.72/1.92  clauses given                 17
% 1.72/1.92  clauses generated            161
% 1.72/1.92  clauses kept                 113
% 1.72/1.92  clauses forward subsumed      80
% 1.72/1.92  clauses back subsumed          2
% 1.72/1.92  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.72/1.92  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Process 22477 finished Wed Jul 27 06:55:34 2022
% 1.72/1.92  Otter interrupted
% 1.72/1.92  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------