↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU170+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  145 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  159 (  62   ~;  64   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  101 (   9 sgn  52   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d5_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => subset_complement(X1,X2) = set_difference(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_subset_1) ).

fof(involutiveness_k3_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => subset_complement(X1,subset_complement(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',involutiveness_k3_subset_1) ).

fof(dt_k3_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => element(subset_complement(X1,X2),powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k3_subset_1) ).

fof(t43_subset_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => ! [X3] :
          ( element(X3,powerset(X1))
         => ( disjoint(X2,X3)
          <=> subset(X2,subset_complement(X1,X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t43_subset_1) ).

fof(d4_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] :
              ~ ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X2) ) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X1)
              & in(X3,X2) )
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_xboole_0) ).

fof(l3_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
         => in(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l3_subset_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(X3))
      | subset_complement(X3,X4) = set_difference(X3,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(X3))
      | subset_complement(X3,subset_complement(X3,X4)) = X4 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[involutiveness_k3_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(X3))
      | element(subset_complement(X3,X4),powerset(X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k3_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
       => ! [X3] :
            ( element(X3,powerset(X1))
           => ( disjoint(X2,X3)
            <=> subset(X2,subset_complement(X1,X3)) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t43_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( in(X8,X5)
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X6)
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X5)
        | in(X8,X6)
        | in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | ~ in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_xboole_0])])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subset_complement(X1,X2) = set_difference(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset_complement(X1,subset_complement(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( element(subset_complement(X1,X2),powerset(X1))
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk4_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk4_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(esk2_0,powerset(esk1_0))
    & element(esk3_0,powerset(esk1_0))
    & ( ~ disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ subset(esk2_0,subset_complement(esk1_0,esk3_0)) )
    & ( disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      | subset(esk2_0,subset_complement(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( set_difference(X1,subset_complement(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk2_0,subset_complement(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X4,X5,X7] :
      ( ( in(esk5_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | disjoint(X4,X5) )
      & ( in(esk5_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | disjoint(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(X7,X4)
        | ~ in(X7,X5)
        | ~ disjoint(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_0])])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ element(X5,powerset(X4))
      | ~ in(X6,X5)
      | in(X6,X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l3_subset_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ in(X3,subset_complement(X2,X1))
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | in(X1,subset_complement(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ in(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk3_0,powerset(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( in(X4,X1)
    | in(X4,X3)
    | X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,powerset(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk2_0,subset_complement(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( disjoint(X1,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(esk5_2(X1,esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( subset(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(esk4_2(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ in(esk4_2(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk2_0,X1)
    | in(esk4_2(esk2_0,X1),esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ subset(esk2_0,set_difference(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_13]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk2_0,set_difference(esk1_0,X1))
    | in(esk4_2(esk2_0,set_difference(esk1_0,X1)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk2_0,set_difference(esk1_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk4_2(esk2_0,set_difference(esk1_0,esk3_0)),esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_36]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SEU170+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 05:45:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/1.45  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.26/1.45  
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object total steps             : 48
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object clause steps            : 31
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object conjectures             : 18
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 15
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 16
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object generating inferences   : 14
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 11
% 0.26/1.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 27
% 0.26/1.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.26/1.45  # Initial clauses                      : 37
% 0.26/1.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 37
% 0.26/1.45  # Processed clauses                    : 5766
% 0.26/1.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 74
% 0.26/1.45  # ...subsumed                          : 4289
% 0.26/1.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1403
% 0.26/1.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 48
% 0.26/1.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 65
% 0.26/1.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 48
% 0.26/1.45  # Generated clauses                    : 53461
% 0.26/1.45  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 43928
% 0.26/1.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1716
% 0.26/1.45  # Paramodulations                      : 53252
% 0.26/1.45  # Factorizations                       : 148
% 0.26/1.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 59
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1288
% 0.26/1.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 176
% 0.26/1.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 77
% 0.26/1.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1035
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37584
% 0.26/1.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 132011
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 115
% 0.26/1.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 247731
% 0.26/1.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 199375
% 0.26/1.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4669
% 0.26/1.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5297
% 0.26/1.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 389
% 0.26/1.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 0.26/1.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 810061
% 0.26/1.45  
% 0.26/1.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.45  # User time                : 0.900 s
% 0.26/1.45  # System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.26/1.45  # Total time               : 0.919 s
% 0.26/1.45  # Maximum resident set size: 36796 pages
% 0.26/23.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.54  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------