↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU171+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:52:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  13 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   91 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   85 (  33   ~;  22   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  32   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X0)
       => ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> in(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( empty(X0)
       => ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> empty(X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_subset_1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = set_difference(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ( in(X3,X0)
            & ~ in(X3,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( element(X1,powerset(X0))
     => subset_complement(X0,X1) = set_difference(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_subset_1) ).

fof(f20,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 != empty_set
     => ! [X1] :
          ( element(X1,powerset(X0))
         => ! [X2] :
              ( element(X2,X0)
             => ( ~ in(X2,X1)
               => in(X2,subset_complement(X0,X1)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t50_subset_1) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( X0 != empty_set
       => ! [X1] :
            ( element(X1,powerset(X0))
           => ! [X2] :
                ( element(X2,X0)
               => ( ~ in(X2,X1)
                 => in(X2,subset_complement(X0,X1)) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f20]) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( empty(X0)
     => X0 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> in(X1,X0) )
        | empty(X0) )
      & ( ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> empty(X1) )
        | ~ empty(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset_complement(X0,X1) = set_difference(X0,X1)
      | ~ element(X1,powerset(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ~ in(X2,subset_complement(X0,X1))
              & ~ in(X2,X1)
              & element(X2,X0) )
          & element(X1,powerset(X0)) )
      & X0 != empty_set ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ~ in(X2,subset_complement(X0,X1))
              & ~ in(X2,X1)
              & element(X2,X0) )
          & element(X1,powerset(X0)) )
      & X0 != empty_set ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = empty_set
      | ~ empty(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X1,X0)
      | in(X1,X0)
      | empty(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( in(X3,X1)
      | ~ in(X3,X0)
      | in(X3,X2)
      | set_difference(X0,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X1,powerset(X0))
      | set_difference(X0,X1) = subset_complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    element(sK8,sK6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ~ in(sK8,sK7),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ~ in(sK8,subset_complement(sK6,sK7)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    element(sK7,powerset(sK6)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    empty_set != sK6,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ empty(X0)
      | empty_set = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( in(X3,set_difference(X0,X1))
      | ~ in(X3,X0)
      | in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f93,definition,
    ( spl9_1
  <=> empty(sK6) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl9_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( empty(sK6)
    | ~ spl9_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ~ empty(sK6)
    | spl9_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ( in(sK8,sK6)
    | empty(sK6) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f38,f61]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( in(sK8,sK6)
    | spl9_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f123,f95]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    subset_complement(sK6,sK7) = set_difference(sK6,sK7),
    inference(resolution,[],[f47,f64]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ~ in(sK8,set_difference(sK6,sK7)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f63,f146]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK8,sK6)
    | in(sK8,sK7) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f69,f150]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    ( in(sK8,sK7)
    | spl9_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f166,f124]) ).

fof(f174,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl9_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f173,f62]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    spl9_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f174]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ( empty_set = sK6
    | ~ spl9_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f94,f66]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl9_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f180,f65]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ~ spl9_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f181]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    spl9_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f175]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ~ spl9_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f182]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s3]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU171+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:58:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45  % (2092)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.11/0.45  % (2099)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1117730785:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.11/0.45  % (2098)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.11/0.45  % (2097)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=2940265730_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.45  % (2098)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1933204612:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.11/0.45  % (2102)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1109024838:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.11/0.45  % (2103)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=902948963:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=441131311:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.11/0.45  % TRYING [1]
% 0.11/0.45  % TRYING [2]
% 0.11/0.45  % TRYING [3]
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2092-2101"...
% 0.11/0.45  % TRYING [4]
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)...printing done.
% 0.11/0.45  % (2098) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2092-2098"...
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.11/0.45  % (2101)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.11/0.45  % (2092)Success in time 0.031 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------