%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU172+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:53 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.74s 12.79s
% Output : Refutation 4.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 15 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 82 ( 15 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 237 ( 26 ~; 0 |; 21 &; 167 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 21 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 0 ^; 56 !; 10 ?; 66 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(element_decl,type,
element: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(powerset_decl,type,
powerset: $i > $i ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(subset_complement_decl,type,
subset_complement: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(empty_set_decl,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(set_difference_decl,type,
set_difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ powerset @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_subset_1) ).
thf(84,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ powerset @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty_set @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_boole) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty_set @ ( A @ set_difference ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( empty_set @ set_difference ) )
= empty_set ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_boole) ).
thf(41,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( empty_set @ set_difference ) )
= empty_set ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(73,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
empty_set @ empty,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(34,plain,
empty_set @ empty,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ? [B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_subset_1) ).
thf(76,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ? [B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(31,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',involutiveness_k3_subset_1) ).
thf(87,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k3_subset_1) ).
thf(82,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_subset_1) ).
thf(94,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_subset_1) ).
thf(90,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
=> ~ ( ( C @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_subset_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
=> ~ ( ( C @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(20,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
=> ~ ( ( C @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) ) )
<=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
<=> ( ~ ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( ~ ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
=> ( ~ ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) )
=> ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) ) ) )
& ( ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_difference ) ) )
=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( ~ ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
=> ( ~ ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(29,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(80,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(100,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,84,38,41,73,34,44,76,31,87,82,94,90,20,46,29,80,35]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU172+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/10.82 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/10.82 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/10.82 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/10.82 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/10.82 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/10.82 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/10.82 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/10.82 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:44:02 UTC 2026
% 0.13/10.82 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/10.82 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.83/11.35 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.19/11.53 % [INFO] Parsing done (175ms).
% 1.19/11.55 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.91/11.91 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.91/11.92 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.91/12.02 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 21 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.13/12.08 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 17 axioms (removed 4 axioms).
% 2.13/12.11 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.13/12.11 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.13/12.12 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.74/12.78 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.74/12.79 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.74/12.79 % Time passed: 1829ms (effective reasoning time: 1234ms)
% 3.74/12.79 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.74/12.79 % Axioms used in derivation (17): fc1_xboole_0, involutiveness_k3_subset_1, t4_boole, rc1_subset_1, existence_m1_subset_1, d5_subset_1, d4_xboole_0, t3_boole, rc2_xboole_0, t6_boole, rc2_subset_1, t7_boole, fc1_subset_1, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0, dt_k3_subset_1, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 3.74/12.79 % No. of inferences in proof: 38
% 3.74/12.79 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1829 ms resp. 1234 ms w/o parsing
% 4.12/12.85 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.12/12.85 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------