↑ Up

lazyCoP---0.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SEU172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:53:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.29s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem  : SEU172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.08/0.27  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.27  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 01:26:18 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.29  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.29  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 0.08/0.29  	element(sK9,powerset(sK7))).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c1, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	element(sK9,powerset(sK7)),
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 0.08/0.29  	subset_complement(X0,X1) = set_difference(X0,X1) | ~element(X1,powerset(X0))).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	sK9 = X1).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	powerset(sK7) = powerset(X0)).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c3, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c4, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	subset_complement(X0,X1) = set_difference(X0,X1),
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c5, axiom,
% 0.08/0.29  	in(sK8,subset_complement(sK7,sK9))).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	subset_complement(sK7,sK9) = subset_complement(X0,X1)).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	set_difference(X0,X1) = X2).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c6, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c7, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c8, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	in(sK8,X2),
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c9, axiom,
% 0.08/0.29  	sP0(X3,X4,X5) | ~in(X4,X6) | ~sP1(X5,X3,X6)).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	sK8 = X4).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X2 = X6).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c10, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c8, c9])).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c11, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	sP0(X3,X4,X5) | ~sP1(X5,X3,X6),
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c8, c9])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c12, axiom,
% 0.08/0.29  	~in(X7,X8) | ~sP0(X8,X7,X9)).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X3 = X8).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X4 = X7).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X5 = X9).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c13, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	~sP1(X5,X3,X6),
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7, a8])], [c11, c12])).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c14, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	~in(X7,X8),
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7, a8])], [c11, c12])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c15, axiom,
% 0.08/0.29  	in(sK8,sK9)).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X7 = sK8).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X8 = sK9).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c16, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9, a10])], [c14, c15])).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c17, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9, a10])], [c14, c15])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c18, axiom,
% 0.08/0.29  	sP1(X10,X11,set_difference(X10,X11))).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X5 = X10).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X3 = X11).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(a13, assumption,
% 0.08/0.29  	X6 = set_difference(X10,X11)).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c19, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a11, a12, a13])], [c13, c18])).
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c20, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a11, a12, a13])], [c13, c18])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  cnf(c21, plain,
% 0.08/0.29  	$false,
% 0.08/0.29  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X0, sK7),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X1, sK9),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X2, set_difference(X0,X1)),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X3, sK9),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X4, sK8),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X5, sK7),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X6, set_difference(X0,X1)),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X7, sK8),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X8, sK9),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X9, sK7),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X10, sK7),
% 0.08/0.29  		bind(X11, sK9)
% 0.08/0.29  	],
% 0.08/0.29  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13])).
% 0.08/0.29  
% 0.08/0.29  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------