↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU173+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  35   ~;  33   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   1 sgn  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( empty(X1)
       => ( element(X2,X1)
        <=> empty(X2) ) )
      & ( ~ empty(X1)
       => ( element(X2,X1)
        <=> in(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_subset_1) ).

fof(l71_subset_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) )
     => element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l71_subset_1) ).

fof(t7_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( empty(X2)
        & in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

fof(d1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = powerset(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> subset(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( empty(X1)
       => ( element(X2,X1)
        <=> empty(X2) ) )
      & ( ~ empty(X1)
       => ( element(X2,X1)
        <=> in(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d2_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
           => in(X3,X2) )
       => element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l71_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X7)
        | element(X8,X7)
        | ~ empty(X8) )
      & ( ~ empty(X7)
        | empty(X8)
        | ~ element(X8,X7) )
      & ( empty(X7)
        | element(X8,X7)
        | ~ in(X8,X7) )
      & ( empty(X7)
        | in(X8,X7)
        | ~ element(X8,X7) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] :
      ( ~ empty(X32)
      | ~ in(X31,X32) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X6] :
      ( ~ element(esk1_0,powerset(esk2_0))
      & ( in(X6,esk2_0)
        | ~ in(X6,esk1_0) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | empty(X2)
    | element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20] :
      ( ( X20 = powerset(X19)
        | subset(esk6_2(X19,X20),X19)
        | in(esk6_2(X19,X20),X20) )
      & ( X20 = powerset(X19)
        | ~ subset(esk6_2(X19,X20),X19)
        | ~ in(esk6_2(X19,X20),X20) )
      & ( X16 != powerset(X15)
        | in(X18,X16)
        | ~ subset(X18,X15) )
      & ( X16 != powerset(X15)
        | subset(X17,X15)
        | ~ in(X17,X16) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_zfmisc_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
      ( ( subset(X28,X29)
        | ~ in(esk7_2(X28,X29),X29) )
      & ( subset(X28,X29)
        | in(esk7_2(X28,X29),X28) )
      & ( in(X27,X26)
        | ~ in(X27,X25)
        | ~ subset(X25,X26) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(esk1_0,powerset(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X3 != powerset(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk1_0)
    | in(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk1_0,powerset(esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk7_2(esk1_0,X1),esk2_0)
    | subset(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU173+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:55:04 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.58  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % sh5l with pid 1829357 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.24/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.24/0.58  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.24/0.58  % Search class: FGHSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.58  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1829365 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.24/0.58  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.24/0.58  % Search class: FGHSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.58  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.58  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.58  
% 0.24/0.58  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.58  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.58  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.24/0.58  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.24/0.58  % Initial clauses                      : 27
% 0.24/0.58  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 27
% 0.24/0.58  % Processed clauses                    : 68
% 0.24/0.58  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.24/0.58  % ...remaining for further processing  : 57
% 0.24/0.58  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.24/0.58  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.24/0.58  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.24/0.58  % Generated clauses                    : 73
% 0.24/0.58  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 54
% 0.24/0.58  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.24/0.58  % Paramodulations                      : 70
% 0.24/0.58  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.24/0.58  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Total rewrite steps                  : 12
% 0.24/0.58  % ...of those cached                   : 7
% 0.24/0.58  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.58  % Current number of processed clauses  : 48
% 0.24/0.58  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.24/0.58  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.58  %    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.24/0.58  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 29
% 0.24/0.58  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.24/0.58  % ...number of literals in the above   : 25
% 0.24/0.58  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.24/0.58  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 82
% 0.24/0.58  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.24/0.58  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.24/0.58  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% 0.24/0.58  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.24/0.58  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.24/0.58  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.58  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2196
% 0.24/0.58  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 392
% 0.24/0.58  
% 0.24/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.58  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.58  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.58  % Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.24/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.24/0.58  
% 0.24/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.58  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.24/0.58  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.58  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.24/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------