↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU177+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:41:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 31.20s 4.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 31.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  16   ~;  13   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   4 sgn  12   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( X1 = 'relation$udom'(X0)
        <=> ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X1)
            <=> ? [X3] : in('ordered$upair'(X2,X3),X0) ) ) ) ).

fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( X1 = 'relation$urng'(X0)
        <=> ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X1)
            <=> ? [X3] : in('ordered$upair'(X3,X2),X0) ) ) ) ).

fof(t20_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( in('ordered$upair'(X0,X1),X2)
       => ( in(X1,'relation$urng'(X2))
          & in(X0,'relation$udom'(X2)) ) ) ) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => ( in('ordered$upair'(X0,X1),X2)
         => ( in(X1,'relation$urng'(X2))
            & in(X0,'relation$udom'(X2)) ) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[t20_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c90,plain,
    ( ~ in('ordered$upair'(X2,X3),X0)
    | in(X2,X1)
    | X1 != 'relation$udom'(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[d4_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c119,plain,
    ( ~ in('ordered$upair'(X3,X2),X0)
    | in(X2,X1)
    | X1 != 'relation$urng'(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[d5_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c278,plain,
    relation(sK345),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c279,plain,
    in('ordered$upair'(sK343,sK344),sK345),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c280,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK344,'relation$urng'(sK345))
    | ~ in(sK343,'relation$udom'(sK345)) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in('ordered$upair'(X2,X0),X1)
    | in(X0,'relation$urng'(X1)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c119]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK345)
    | in(sK344,'relation$urng'(sK345)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d0,c279]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    in(sK344,'relation$urng'(sK345)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c278,d1]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in('ordered$upair'(X0,X2),X1)
    | in(X0,'relation$udom'(X1)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c90]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK345)
    | in(sK343,'relation$udom'(sK345)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,c279]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    in(sK343,'relation$udom'(sK345)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c278,d4]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    ~ in(sK344,'relation$urng'(sK345)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d5,c280]) ).

cnf(d7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d6,d2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU177+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:43:09 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.44  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 31.20/4.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 31.20/4.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------