%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SEU179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:24:31 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SEU179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.00/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 03:22:17 EDT 2022 % 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.32 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.14/0.32 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y % 0.14/0.32 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.14/0.32 # % 0.14/0.32 # Number of axioms: 41 Number of unprocessed: 41 % 0.14/0.32 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.14/0.32 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.14/0.32 # Hello from C++ % 0.14/0.32 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.14/0.32 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.14/0.32 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.14/0.32 # 41 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.14/0.32 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures. % 0.14/0.32 # There are 4 start rule candidates: % 0.14/0.32 # Found 17 unit axioms. % 0.14/0.32 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.14/0.32 # 4 start rule tableaux created. % 0.14/0.32 # 24 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.14/0.32 # 17 unit axiom clauses % 0.14/0.32 % 0.14/0.32 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.14/0.32 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4 % 0.14/0.32 # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.14/0.32 # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on % 0.14/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.14/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.14/0.37 % 0.14/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.14/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (relation(esk9_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk14_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk15_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (empty(esk9_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (empty(esk11_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (~empty(esk13_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (empty(esk12_1(X1)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk14_0,esk15_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (subset(X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~empty(singleton(X1)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~empty(powerset(X1)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (element(esk8_1(X1),X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (empty(X1)|~empty(esk10_1(X1)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (element(esk12_1(X1),powerset(X1)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (empty(X1)|element(esk10_1(X1),powerset(X1)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (element(X1,powerset(X2))|~subset(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~element(X1,powerset(X2)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(X1,X2)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (in(X3,X2)|~in(X3,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (~empty(X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (~subset(relation_dom(esk14_0),relation_dom(esk15_0))|~subset(relation_rng(esk14_0),relation_rng(esk15_0)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (element(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (in(X2,X4)|X4!=relation_rng(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (in(X1,X4)|X4!=relation_dom(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,esk6_2(X1,X2)),singleton(X3)),X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X2=relation_dom(X1)|in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X1)|~relation(X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|in(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk7_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk7_2(X1,X2))),X1)|~relation(X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X2=relation_dom(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),X3),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk2_3(X3,X2,X1)),singleton(X1)),X3)|X2!=relation_dom(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk5_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),singleton(esk5_3(X3,X2,X1))),X3)|X2!=relation_rng(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.14/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.14/0.37 # Found 5 steps % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk14_0,esk15_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (subset(esk14_0,esk15_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_210, plain, (element(esk14_0,powerset(esk15_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_43])). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_276, plain, (empty(powerset(esk15_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_24])). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_277, plain, (in(esk14_0,powerset(esk15_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_277, ...])). % 0.14/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.14/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.14/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.14/0.38 # Child (4576) has found a proof. % 0.14/0.38 % 0.14/0.38 # Proof search is over... % 0.14/0.38 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------