↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU180+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 15.84s 2.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 15.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   79 (  43 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  194 (  94 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  191 (  76   ~;  76   |;  22   &)
%                                         (  10 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  157 (  15 sgn  67   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_union2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            | in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( B = relation_dom(A)
        <=> ! [C] :
              ( in(C,B)
            <=> ? [D] : in(ordered_pair(C,D),A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).

fof(d4_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_difference(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( ~ in(D,B)
            & in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).

fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( B = relation_rng(A)
        <=> ! [C] :
              ( in(C,B)
            <=> ? [D] : in(ordered_pair(D,C),A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d5_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(d6_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => relation_field(A) = set_union2(relation_dom(A),relation_rng(A)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d6_relat_1) ).

fof(l1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A] : singleton(A) != empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',l1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t1_boole,axiom,
    ! [A] : set_union2(A,empty_set) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',t1_boole) ).

fof(t2_boole,axiom,
    ! [A] : set_intersection2(A,empty_set) = empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',t2_boole) ).

fof(t3_boole,axiom,
    ! [A] : set_difference(A,empty_set) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',t3_boole) ).

fof(t48_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B)) = set_intersection2(A,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t48_xboole_1) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [A] : unordered_pair(A,A) = singleton(A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(t30_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( relation(C)
     => ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),C)
       => ( in(B,relation_field(C))
          & in(A,relation_field(C)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t30_relat_1) ).

fof(t30_relat_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( relation(C)
       => ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),C)
         => ( in(B,relation_field(C))
            & in(A,relation_field(C)) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t30_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_165,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_166,plain,
    set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_12,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ( ( D != B
                & D != A )
              | ~ in(D,C) )
            & ( D = B
              | D = A
              | in(D,C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) = C )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( ( X0 != B
                & X0 != A )
              | in(X0,C) )
            & ( X0 = B
              | X0 = A
              | ~ in(X0,C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

fof(sk_d2_tarski_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ( ( ( sK0(A,B,C) != B
              & sK0(A,B,C) != A )
            | ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),C) )
          & ( sK0(A,B,C) = B
            | sK0(A,B,C) = A
            | in(sK0(A,B,C),C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) = C )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( ( X0 != B
                & X0 != A )
              | in(X0,C) )
            & ( X0 = B
              | X0 = A
              | ~ in(X0,C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(D,sK0(A,B,C))],[nnf_12]) ).

fof(sk_d2_tarski,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) != VAR_1
        | ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) != VAR_0
        | ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) = VAR_1
        | sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) = VAR_0
        | in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_1
        | in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_0
        | in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 = VAR_1
        | VAR_3 = VAR_0
        | ~ in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_tarski_sk]) ).

cnf(c_200,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,C) = B
    | sK0(A,B,C) = A
    | in(sK0(A,B,C),C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) = C ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_204,plain,
    ( ~ in(D,A)
    | in(D,C)
    | set_union2(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_228,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(C,D),A)
    | in(C,B)
    | relation_dom(A) != B
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_239,plain,
    ( ~ in(D,B)
    | ~ in(D,C)
    | set_difference(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_245,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(D,C),A)
    | in(C,B)
    | relation_rng(A) != B
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_249,plain,
    ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_250,plain,
    ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_165,c_249]) ).

cnf(c_251,plain,
    ( relation_field(A) = set_union2(relation_dom(A),relation_rng(A))
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d6_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_281,plain,
    singleton(A) != empty_set,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l1_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_325,plain,
    set_union2(A,empty_set) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t1_boole]) ).

cnf(c_339,plain,
    set_intersection2(A,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t2_boole]) ).

cnf(c_353,plain,
    set_difference(A,empty_set) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t3_boole]) ).

cnf(c_369,plain,
    set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B)) = set_intersection2(A,B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_370,plain,
    set_intersection2(A,B) = set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_369]) ).

cnf(c_383,plain,
    singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(nnf_148,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ~ in(B,relation_field(C))
        | ~ in(A,relation_field(C)) )
      & in(ordered_pair(A,B),C)
      & relation(C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t30_relat_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t30_relat_1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ in(sK3,relation_field(sK1))
      | ~ in(sK2,relation_field(sK1)) )
    & in(ordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK1)
    & relation(sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(A,sK2),skolemize(B,sK3),skolemize(C,sK1)],[nnf_148]) ).

cnf(c_398,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t30_relat_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_399,negated_conjecture,
    in(ordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t30_relat_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_8047,negated_conjecture,
    in(unordered_pair(singleton(sK2),unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_250,c_399]) ).

cnf(c_400,negated_conjecture,
    in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK2,sK2),unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_8047]) ).

cnf(c_401,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK3,relation_field(sK1))
    | ~ in(sK2,relation_field(sK1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t30_relat_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_429,plain,
    ( ~ in(C,B)
    | set_difference(A,B) != B ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_239]) ).

cnf(c_8048,plain,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(D),unordered_pair(D,C)),A)
    | in(C,B)
    | relation_rng(A) != B
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_250,c_245]) ).

cnf(c_435,plain,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(D,D),unordered_pair(D,C)),A)
    | in(C,B)
    | relation_rng(A) != B
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_8048]) ).

cnf(c_8049,plain,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(C),unordered_pair(C,D)),A)
    | in(C,B)
    | relation_dom(A) != B
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_250,c_228]) ).

cnf(c_439,plain,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(C,C),unordered_pair(C,D)),A)
    | in(C,B)
    | relation_dom(A) != B
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_8049]) ).

cnf(c_8050,plain,
    set_difference(A,set_difference(A,empty_set)) = empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_370,c_339]) ).

cnf(c_462,plain,
    set_difference(A,A) = empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_8050]) ).

cnf(c_490,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,A) != empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_281]) ).

cnf(c_532,plain,
    ~ in(A,empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_429,c_462]) ).

cnf(c_709,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,empty_set) = B
    | sK0(A,B,empty_set) = A
    | unordered_pair(A,B) = empty_set ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_532]) ).

cnf(c_8051,plain,
    ( sK0(A,A,empty_set) = A
    | unordered_pair(A,A) = empty_set ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_709]) ).

cnf(c_738,plain,
    sK0(A,A,empty_set) = A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_490,c_8051]) ).

cnf(c_840,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,C)
    | in(A,set_union2(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_166]) ).

cnf(c_8052,plain,
    A = sK0(A,A,empty_set),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_738]) ).

cnf(c_8053,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | in(A,sK0(set_union2(B,C),set_union2(B,C),empty_set)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_8052]) ).

cnf(c_841,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | in(A,set_union2(B,C)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_738,c_8053]) ).

cnf(c_2094,plain,
    relation_field(sK1) = set_union2(relation_dom(sK1),relation_rng(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_251,c_398]) ).

cnf(c_8054,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK3,relation_field(sK1))
    | ~ in(sK2,set_union2(relation_dom(sK1),relation_rng(sK1))) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2094,c_401]) ).

cnf(c_2095,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK3,set_union2(relation_dom(sK1),relation_rng(sK1)))
    | ~ in(sK2,set_union2(relation_dom(sK1),relation_rng(sK1))) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2094,c_8054]) ).

cnf(c_8055,plain,
    A = set_union2(empty_set,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_325,c_166]) ).

cnf(c_3564,plain,
    set_union2(empty_set,A) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_8055]) ).

cnf(c_8056,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK3,A)
    | relation_rng(sK1) != A
    | ~ relation(sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_435,c_400]) ).

cnf(c_7798,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK3,A)
    | relation_rng(sK1) != A ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_398,c_8056]) ).

cnf(c_8057,plain,
    A = set_union2(empty_set,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_3564]) ).

cnf(c_8058,plain,
    in(sK3,set_union2(empty_set,relation_rng(sK1))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7798,c_8057]) ).

cnf(c_7912,plain,
    in(sK3,relation_rng(sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3564,c_8058]) ).

cnf(c_7926,plain,
    in(sK3,set_union2(A,relation_rng(sK1))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7912,c_840]) ).

cnf(c_7979,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK2,set_union2(relation_dom(sK1),relation_rng(sK1))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7926,c_2095]) ).

cnf(c_8059,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK2,A)
    | relation_dom(sK1) != A
    | ~ relation(sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_439,c_400]) ).

cnf(c_7995,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK2,A)
    | relation_dom(sK1) != A ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_398,c_8059]) ).

cnf(c_8060,plain,
    A = set_union2(empty_set,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_3564]) ).

cnf(c_8061,plain,
    in(sK2,set_union2(empty_set,relation_dom(sK1))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7995,c_8060]) ).

cnf(c_8032,plain,
    in(sK2,relation_dom(sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3564,c_8061]) ).

cnf(c_8045,plain,
    in(sK2,set_union2(relation_dom(sK1),A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8032,c_841]) ).

cnf(c_8046,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8045,c_7979]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU180+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.46  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:43:25 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.47  % Process 3330382 was started by sandbox on n007,
% 0.19/0.47  % Sat Sep 26 08:43:25 2026
% 0.19/0.47  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.24/0.52  
% 0.24/0.52  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.24/0.52  
% 0.24/0.52  % SInE: 128 to sos, 21 to usable, of 149 axioms (tolerance 2.00, depth 0 fixpoint).
% 15.84/2.57  
% 15.84/2.57  % given #500 (F,wt=15): 4899 -disjoint(powerset(A),f37(empty_set)).  [resolve(4702,a,154,a)].
% 15.84/2.57  
% 15.84/2.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 15.84/2.57  
% 15.84/2.57  % Proof 1 at 1.56 (+ 0.44) seconds.
% 15.84/2.57  % Length of proof is 58.
% 15.84/2.57  % Level of proof is 9.
% 15.84/2.57  % Maximum clause weight is 229.000.
% 15.84/2.57  % Given clauses 727.
% 15.84/2.57  
% 15.84/2.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------