%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SEU183+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:24:34 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.45s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU183+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 08:45:02 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y % 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.18/0.36 # % 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 43 Number of unprocessed: 43 % 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.18/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.18/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.18/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.18/0.37 # 43 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.18/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures. % 0.18/0.37 # There are 3 start rule candidates: % 0.18/0.37 # Found 17 unit axioms. % 0.18/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.18/0.37 # 3 start rule tableaux created. % 0.18/0.37 # 26 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.18/0.37 # 17 unit axiom clauses % 0.18/0.37 % 0.18/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.18/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3 % 0.18/0.37 # Returning from population with 28 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.18/0.37 # We now have 28 tableaux to operate on % 0.18/0.45 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.18/0.45 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.18/0.45 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.18/0.45 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.18/0.45 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.18/0.45 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.18/0.45 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.18/0.45 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.18/0.45 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.18/0.45 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.18/0.45 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.18/0.45 % 0.18/0.45 # End clausification derivation % 0.18/0.45 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (relation(esk10_0))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk15_0))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk16_0))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (empty(esk10_0))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (empty(esk12_0))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~empty(esk14_0))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (empty(esk13_1(X1)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (subset(X1,X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~empty(singleton(X1)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~empty(powerset(X1)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (element(esk9_1(X1),X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (empty(X1)|~empty(esk11_1(X1)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (element(esk13_1(X1),powerset(X1)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (empty(X1)|element(esk11_1(X1),powerset(X1)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (element(X1,powerset(X2))|~subset(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~element(X1,powerset(X2)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(X1,X2)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (in(X3,X2)|~in(X3,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (~empty(X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (element(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (~subset(relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk16_0)),relation_rng(esk16_0)))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (in(X2,X4)|X4!=relation_rng(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,esk3_2(X1,X2)),singleton(X3)),X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1)|~relation(X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X4),singleton(X1)),X6)|X6!=relation_composition(X3,X5)|~relation(X6)|~relation(X5)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X4),singleton(X2)),X5)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),singleton(esk2_3(X3,X2,X1))),X3)|X2!=relation_rng(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X3=relation_composition(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),esk7_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),esk8_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X3=relation_composition(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),esk7_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_3(X1,X2,X3),esk7_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk8_3(X1,X2,X3))),X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X3=relation_composition(X1,X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,esk7_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(X4)),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X4),singleton(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),esk7_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk5_5(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5)),singleton(X1)),X2)|X4!=relation_composition(X2,X3)|~relation(X4)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X5),singleton(X1)),X4))). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk5_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),singleton(esk5_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))),X2)|X3!=relation_composition(X1,X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X5),singleton(X4)),X3))). % 0.18/0.45 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.18/0.45 # Begin printing tableau % 0.18/0.45 # Found 6 steps % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk16_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (relation(esk16_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_23])). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_166, plain, (~relation(esk10_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_31])). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_165, plain, (relation(relation_composition(esk16_0,esk10_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_23])). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_443, plain, (~relation(esk10_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_31])). % 0.18/0.45 cnf(i_0_441, plain, (relation(relation_composition(esk10_0,relation_composition(esk16_0,esk10_0)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_441, ...])). % 0.18/0.45 # End printing tableau % 0.18/0.45 # SZS output end % 0.18/0.45 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.18/0.46 # Child (28052) has found a proof. % 0.18/0.46 % 0.18/0.46 # Proof search is over... % 0.18/0.46 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------