%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SEU190+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n006.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:24:37 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 4.46s 0.97s % Output : CNFRefutation 4.46s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU190+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 05:59:25 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y % 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.12/0.37 # % 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 45 Number of unprocessed: 45 % 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.37 # 45 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.12/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.37 # Found 15 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.37 # 30 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.37 # 15 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.37 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on % 4.46/0.97 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts. % 4.46/0.97 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 4.46/0.97 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 4.46/0.97 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 4.46/0.97 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations. % 4.46/0.97 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 4.46/0.97 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 4.46/0.97 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 4.46/0.97 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.46/0.97 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.46/0.97 # Begin clausification derivation % 4.46/0.97 % 4.46/0.97 # End clausification derivation % 4.46/0.97 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (empty(esk10_0))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (empty(esk11_0))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (relation(empty_set))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (relation(esk10_0))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (relation(esk12_0))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (~empty(esk12_0))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (~empty(esk13_0))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (relation(identity_relation(X1)))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (relation(X1)|~empty(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~empty(singleton(X1)))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (empty(relation_dom(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (empty(relation_rng(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (relation(relation_dom(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (relation(relation_rng(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (element(esk9_1(X1),X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (relation_dom(identity_relation(esk15_0))!=esk15_0|relation_rng(identity_relation(esk15_0))!=esk15_0)). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (empty(X1)|~relation(X1)|~empty(relation_dom(X1)))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (empty(X1)|~relation(X1)|~empty(relation_rng(X1)))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(X1,X2)))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (X1=X2|in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (X1=X2|~in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4)|X1!=X3|X4!=identity_relation(X2)|~relation(X4)|~in(X1,X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=X2|X3!=identity_relation(X4)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (in(X2,X4)|X4!=relation_rng(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (in(X1,X4)|X4!=relation_dom(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(X1,X2)|X4!=identity_relation(X2)|~relation(X4)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,esk7_2(X1,X2)),singleton(X3)),X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X2=identity_relation(X1)|esk2_2(X1,X2)=esk1_2(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2))),X2)|~relation(X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X2=identity_relation(X1)|in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2))),X2)|~relation(X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X2=relation_dom(X1)|in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1)|~relation(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|in(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk7_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk8_2(X1,X2))),X1)|~relation(X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X2=relation_dom(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),X3),singleton(esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk3_3(X3,X2,X1)),singleton(X1)),X3)|X2!=relation_dom(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X2=identity_relation(X1)|esk2_2(X1,X2)!=esk1_2(X1,X2)|~relation(X2)|~in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2))),X2))). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),singleton(esk6_3(X3,X2,X1))),X3)|X2!=relation_rng(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 4.46/0.97 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 4.46/0.97 # Begin printing tableau % 4.46/0.97 # Found 7 steps % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (relation_dom(identity_relation(esk15_0))!=esk15_0|relation_rng(identity_relation(esk15_0))!=esk15_0), inference(start_rule)). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (relation_rng(identity_relation(esk15_0))!=esk15_0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_228, plain, (~relation(identity_relation(esk15_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_226, plain, (in(esk7_2(identity_relation(esk15_0),esk15_0),esk15_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_52])). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (relation_dom(identity_relation(esk15_0))!=esk15_0), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_227, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_2(identity_relation(esk15_0),esk15_0),esk7_2(identity_relation(esk15_0),esk15_0)),singleton(esk8_2(identity_relation(esk15_0),esk15_0))),identity_relation(esk15_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_227, ...])). % 4.46/0.97 cnf(i_0_269, plain, (~empty(esk15_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_269, ...])). % 4.46/0.97 # End printing tableau % 4.46/0.97 # SZS output end % 4.46/0.97 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 4.46/0.98 # Child (25415) has found a proof. % 4.46/0.98 % 4.46/0.98 # Proof search is over... % 4.46/0.98 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------