%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU191+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:28:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 20.78s 3.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 20.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 182 ( 29 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 249 ( 106 ~; 112 |; 18 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 105 ( 7 sgn 38 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> ( X3 = X4
& in(X3,X1) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ? [X6] :
( in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2)
& in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& relation(X1) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t74_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
& in(X1,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18] :
( ( ~ relation(X14)
| X14 = identity_relation(X13)
| in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X13,X14),esk6_2(X13,X14)),X14)
| esk5_2(X13,X14) = esk6_2(X13,X14) )
& ( ~ relation(X14)
| X14 = identity_relation(X13)
| in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X13,X14),esk6_2(X13,X14)),X14)
| in(esk5_2(X13,X14),X13) )
& ( ~ relation(X14)
| X14 = identity_relation(X13)
| esk5_2(X13,X14) != esk6_2(X13,X14)
| ~ in(esk5_2(X13,X14),X13)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X13,X14),esk6_2(X13,X14)),X14) )
& ( ~ relation(X14)
| X14 != identity_relation(X13)
| in(ordered_pair(X17,X18),X14)
| X17 != X18
| ~ in(X17,X13) )
& ( ~ relation(X14)
| X14 != identity_relation(X13)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),X14)
| X15 = X16 )
& ( ~ relation(X14)
| X14 != identity_relation(X13)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),X14)
| in(X15,X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X50] : relation(identity_relation(X50)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25,X27,X28,X29,X32] :
( ( ~ relation(X21)
| ~ relation(X22)
| ~ relation(X23)
| X23 = relation_composition(X21,X22)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X21,X22,X23),esk9_3(X21,X22,X23)),X23)
| in(ordered_pair(esk10_3(X21,X22,X23),esk9_3(X21,X22,X23)),X22) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| ~ relation(X22)
| ~ relation(X23)
| X23 = relation_composition(X21,X22)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X21,X22,X23),esk9_3(X21,X22,X23)),X23)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X21,X22,X23),esk10_3(X21,X22,X23)),X21) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| ~ relation(X22)
| ~ relation(X23)
| X23 = relation_composition(X21,X22)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X32,esk9_3(X21,X22,X23)),X22)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X21,X22,X23),X32),X21)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X21,X22,X23),esk9_3(X21,X22,X23)),X23) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| ~ relation(X22)
| ~ relation(X23)
| X23 != relation_composition(X21,X22)
| in(ordered_pair(X27,X28),X23)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X29,X28),X22)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X27,X29),X21) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| ~ relation(X22)
| ~ relation(X23)
| X23 != relation_composition(X21,X22)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),X23)
| in(ordered_pair(esk7_5(X21,X22,X23,X24,X25),X25),X22) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| ~ relation(X22)
| ~ relation(X23)
| X23 != relation_composition(X21,X22)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),X23)
| in(ordered_pair(X24,esk7_5(X21,X22,X23,X24,X25)),X21) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X44,X45] :
( relation(relation_composition(X44,X45))
| ~ relation(X45)
| ~ relation(X44) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4)
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != relation_composition(X2,X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X5),X4)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,esk7_5(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5)),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
& in(X1,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t74_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),identity_relation(X2))
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),relation_composition(X2,X3))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,esk7_5(X2,X3,relation_composition(X2,X3),X1,X4)),X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) )
& relation(esk4_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),identity_relation(X3))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),X3))
| ~ relation(X3)
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk7_5(X1,X2,relation_composition(X1,X2),X3,X4),X4),X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| esk7_5(identity_relation(X1),X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2),X3,X4) = X3 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X4),X3))
| ~ relation(X3)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| X6 != relation_composition(X3,X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X5),X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X2),X4)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,esk2_0),relation_composition(X2,esk4_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_31]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| X1 != X3
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),identity_relation(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),identity_relation(X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SEU191+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.44 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:58:31 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 20.78/3.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 20.78/3.58 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 20.78/3.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % sh5l with pid 3560639 completed with status 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Result found by sh5l
% 20.78/3.58 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 20.78/3.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 20.78/3.58 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 20.78/3.58 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 20.78/3.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3560645 completed with status 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 20.78/3.58 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 20.78/3.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 20.78/3.58 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 20.78/3.58 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 20.78/3.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 20.78/3.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 20.78/3.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 20.78/3.58
% 20.78/3.58 % Proof found!
% 20.78/3.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 20.78/3.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 20.78/3.58 % Parsed axioms : 31
% 20.78/3.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 20.78/3.58 % Initial clauses : 44
% 20.78/3.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 20.78/3.58 % Processed clauses : 4852
% 20.78/3.58 % ...of these trivial : 218
% 20.78/3.58 % ...subsumed : 4171
% 20.78/3.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 463
% 20.78/3.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 20.78/3.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Backward-subsumed : 94
% 20.78/3.58 % Backward-rewritten : 23
% 20.78/3.58 % Generated clauses : 54662
% 20.78/3.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 53625
% 20.78/3.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 25
% 20.78/3.58 % Paramodulations : 54654
% 20.78/3.58 % Factorizations : 2
% 20.78/3.58 % NegExts : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Equation resolutions : 7
% 20.78/3.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Total rewrite steps : 6079
% 20.78/3.58 % ...of those cached : 5521
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 20.78/3.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 20.78/3.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 20.78/3.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 20.78/3.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 20.78/3.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 340
% 20.78/3.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 153
% 20.78/3.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 20.78/3.58 % Negative unit clauses : 12
% 20.78/3.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 174
% 20.78/3.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 48079
% 20.78/3.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 59195
% 20.78/3.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 117
% 20.78/3.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 53262
% 20.78/3.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14441
% 20.78/3.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3570
% 20.78/3.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 378
% 20.78/3.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3362
% 20.78/3.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 20.78/3.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 20.78/3.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7481996
% 20.78/3.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 701
% 20.78/3.58
% 20.78/3.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 20.78/3.58 % User time : 2.934 s
% 20.78/3.58 % System time : 0.045 s
% 20.78/3.58 % Total time : 2.979 s
% 20.78/3.58 % Maximum resident set size: 3604 pages
% 20.78/3.58
% 20.78/3.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 20.78/3.58 % User time : 2.938 s
% 20.78/3.58 % System time : 0.051 s
% 20.78/3.58 % Total time : 2.988 s
% 20.78/3.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 20.78/3.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------