↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SEU191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:24:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 15.38s 2.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 15.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 00:32:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.13/0.37  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.37  #
% 0.13/0.37  # Number of axioms: 43 Number of unprocessed: 43
% 0.13/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37  # 43 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37  # Found 16 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.37  # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37  # 27 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37  # 16 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.13/0.37  # Returning from population with 13 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.37  # We now have 13 tableaux to operate on
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 15.38/2.31  # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 15.38/2.31  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 15.38/2.31  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 15.38/2.31  # Begin clausification derivation
% 15.38/2.31  
% 15.38/2.31  # End clausification derivation
% 15.38/2.31  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (empty(empty_set))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (empty(empty_set))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (empty(esk8_0))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (empty(esk9_0))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (relation(empty_set))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (relation(esk8_0))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (relation(esk10_0))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk15_0))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~empty(esk10_0))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (~empty(esk11_0))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (relation(identity_relation(X1)))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (relation(X1)|~empty(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~empty(singleton(X1)))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (element(esk7_1(X1),X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X2)|~relation(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X1)|~relation(X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X2)|~relation(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X1)|~relation(X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(X1,X2)))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (in(esk12_0,esk14_0)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk14_0),esk15_0)))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4)|X1!=X3|X4!=identity_relation(X2)|~relation(X4)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=X2|X3!=identity_relation(X4)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(X1,X2)|X4!=identity_relation(X2)|~relation(X4)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),esk15_0)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk14_0),esk15_0)))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (~in(esk12_0,esk14_0)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),esk15_0)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk14_0),esk15_0)))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X2=identity_relation(X1)|esk2_2(X1,X2)=esk1_2(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2))),X2)|~relation(X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X2=identity_relation(X1)|in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2))),X2)|~relation(X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X4),singleton(X1)),X6)|X6!=relation_composition(X3,X5)|~relation(X6)|~relation(X5)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X4),singleton(X2)),X5)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X2=identity_relation(X1)|esk2_2(X1,X2)!=esk1_2(X1,X2)|~relation(X2)|~in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2))),X2))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X3=relation_composition(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),esk5_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),esk6_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X3=relation_composition(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),esk5_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),esk5_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3))),X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X3=relation_composition(X1,X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,esk5_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(X4)),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),X4),singleton(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3),esk5_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk4_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk3_5(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5)),singleton(X1)),X2)|X4!=relation_composition(X2,X3)|~relation(X4)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X5),singleton(X1)),X4))).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),singleton(esk3_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))),X2)|X3!=relation_composition(X1,X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X5),singleton(X4)),X3))).
% 15.38/2.31  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 15.38/2.31  # Begin printing tableau
% 15.38/2.31  # Found 6 steps
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),esk15_0)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk14_0),esk15_0))), inference(start_rule)).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),esk15_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_371, plain, (~empty(esk15_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_384, plain, (~element(esk7_1(esk15_0),esk15_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,esk13_0),singleton(esk12_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk14_0),esk15_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])).
% 15.38/2.31  cnf(i_0_383, plain, (in(esk7_1(esk15_0),esk15_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_383, ...])).
% 15.38/2.31  # End printing tableau
% 15.38/2.31  # SZS output end
% 15.38/2.31  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 15.38/2.31  # Child (5540) has found a proof.
% 15.38/2.31  
% 15.38/2.31  # Proof search is over...
% 15.38/2.31  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------