%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU191+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 170.83s 29.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 170.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 179 ( 29 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 239 ( 99 ~; 109 |; 18 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 93 ( 5 sgn 38 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ? [X6] :
( in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2)
& in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& relation(X1) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t74_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
& in(X1,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_relat_1) ).
fof(d10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> ( X3 = X4
& in(X3,X1) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X62,X63,X64,X65,X66,X68,X69,X70,X73] :
( ( ~ relation(X62)
| ~ relation(X63)
| ~ relation(X64)
| X64 = relation_composition(X62,X63)
| in(ordered_pair(esk19_3(X62,X63,X64),esk20_3(X62,X63,X64)),X64)
| in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(X62,X63,X64),esk20_3(X62,X63,X64)),X63) )
& ( ~ relation(X62)
| ~ relation(X63)
| ~ relation(X64)
| X64 = relation_composition(X62,X63)
| in(ordered_pair(esk19_3(X62,X63,X64),esk20_3(X62,X63,X64)),X64)
| in(ordered_pair(esk19_3(X62,X63,X64),esk21_3(X62,X63,X64)),X62) )
& ( ~ relation(X62)
| ~ relation(X63)
| ~ relation(X64)
| X64 = relation_composition(X62,X63)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X73,esk20_3(X62,X63,X64)),X63)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk19_3(X62,X63,X64),X73),X62)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk19_3(X62,X63,X64),esk20_3(X62,X63,X64)),X64) )
& ( ~ relation(X62)
| ~ relation(X63)
| ~ relation(X64)
| X64 != relation_composition(X62,X63)
| in(ordered_pair(X68,X69),X64)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X70,X69),X63)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X68,X70),X62) )
& ( ~ relation(X62)
| ~ relation(X63)
| ~ relation(X64)
| X64 != relation_composition(X62,X63)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X65,X66),X64)
| in(ordered_pair(esk18_5(X62,X63,X64,X65,X66),X66),X63) )
& ( ~ relation(X62)
| ~ relation(X63)
| ~ relation(X64)
| X64 != relation_composition(X62,X63)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X65,X66),X64)
| in(ordered_pair(X65,esk18_5(X62,X63,X64,X65,X66)),X62) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X75,X76] :
( relation(relation_composition(X75,X76))
| ~ relation(X76)
| ~ relation(X75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
& in(X1,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t74_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X89,X90,X91,X92,X93,X94] :
( ( ~ relation(X90)
| X90 = identity_relation(X89)
| in(ordered_pair(esk22_2(X89,X90),esk23_2(X89,X90)),X90)
| esk22_2(X89,X90) = esk23_2(X89,X90) )
& ( ~ relation(X90)
| X90 = identity_relation(X89)
| in(ordered_pair(esk22_2(X89,X90),esk23_2(X89,X90)),X90)
| in(esk22_2(X89,X90),X89) )
& ( ~ relation(X90)
| X90 = identity_relation(X89)
| esk22_2(X89,X90) != esk23_2(X89,X90)
| ~ in(esk22_2(X89,X90),X89)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk22_2(X89,X90),esk23_2(X89,X90)),X90) )
& ( ~ relation(X90)
| X90 != identity_relation(X89)
| in(ordered_pair(X93,X94),X90)
| X93 != X94
| ~ in(X93,X89) )
& ( ~ relation(X90)
| X90 != identity_relation(X89)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X91,X92),X90)
| X91 = X92 )
& ( ~ relation(X90)
| X90 != identity_relation(X89)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X91,X92),X90)
| in(X91,X89) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X97] : relation(identity_relation(X97)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != relation_composition(X2,X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X5),X4)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,esk18_5(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5)),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) )
& relation(esk4_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk18_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),relation_composition(X2,X3))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,esk18_5(X2,X3,relation_composition(X2,X3),X1,X4)),X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4)
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk18_5(X1,X2,relation_composition(X1,X2),X3,X4),X4),X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),identity_relation(X3))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk18_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0)),identity_relation(esk3_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),identity_relation(X2))
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| X6 != relation_composition(X3,X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk18_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| esk18_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk1_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| X1 != X3
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]),c_0_18]),c_0_15])]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X5),X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X2),X4)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),identity_relation(X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,esk2_0),relation_composition(X2,esk4_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),identity_relation(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_15])]),c_0_37]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SEU191+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.45 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:56:42 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 170.83/29.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 170.83/29.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 170.83/29.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % new_bool_3 with pid 996676 completed with status 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 170.83/29.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 170.83/29.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 170.83/29.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 170.83/29.46 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 170.83/29.46 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 996680 completed with status 8
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 31s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % new_bool_3 with pid 996845 completed with status 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 170.83/29.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 170.83/29.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 170.83/29.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 170.83/29.46 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 170.83/29.46 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 996680 completed with status 8
% 170.83/29.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 31s (1) cores
% 170.83/29.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 170.83/29.46 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 170.83/29.46
% 170.83/29.46 % Proof found!
% 170.83/29.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 170.83/29.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 170.83/29.46 % Parsed axioms : 177
% 170.83/29.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 105
% 170.83/29.46 % Initial clauses : 133
% 170.83/29.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 133
% 170.83/29.46 % Processed clauses : 4942
% 170.83/29.46 % ...of these trivial : 15
% 170.83/29.46 % ...subsumed : 3808
% 170.83/29.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 1119
% 170.83/29.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 106
% 170.83/29.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Backward-subsumed : 48
% 170.83/29.46 % Backward-rewritten : 138
% 170.83/29.46 % Generated clauses : 23102
% 170.83/29.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21796
% 170.83/29.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 27
% 170.83/29.46 % Paramodulations : 22988
% 170.83/29.46 % Factorizations : 6
% 170.83/29.46 % NegExts : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Equation resolutions : 110
% 170.83/29.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Total rewrite steps : 4224
% 170.83/29.46 % ...of those cached : 3845
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 170.83/29.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 170.83/29.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 170.83/29.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 170.83/29.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 170.83/29.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 794
% 170.83/29.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 156
% 170.83/29.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Negative unit clauses : 84
% 170.83/29.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 554
% 170.83/29.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16356
% 170.83/29.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 64294
% 170.83/29.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 304
% 170.83/29.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44635
% 170.83/29.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30653
% 170.83/29.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1342
% 170.83/29.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3432
% 170.83/29.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 88
% 170.83/29.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 170.83/29.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 170.83/29.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 278652
% 170.83/29.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2743
% 170.83/29.46
% 170.83/29.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 170.83/29.46 % User time : 27.619 s
% 170.83/29.46 % System time : 0.975 s
% 170.83/29.46 % Total time : 28.593 s
% 170.83/29.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4060 pages
% 170.83/29.46
% 170.83/29.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 170.83/29.46 % User time : 27.627 s
% 170.83/29.46 % System time : 0.983 s
% 170.83/29.46 % Total time : 28.610 s
% 170.83/29.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 170.83/29.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------