↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU193+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:11:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.70s 1.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  158 (  66   ~;  72   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   6 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d11_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( relation(X3)
         => ( X3 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
          <=> ! [X4,X5] :
                ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
              <=> ( in(X4,X2)
                  & in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).

fof(d3_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => ( subset(X1,X2)
          <=> ! [X3,X4] :
                ( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
               => in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_relat_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(t88_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => subset(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t88_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X66,X67,X68,X69,X70,X71,X72] :
      ( ( in(X69,X67)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X69,X70),X68)
        | X68 != relation_dom_restriction(X66,X67)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ relation(X66) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(X69,X70),X66)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X69,X70),X68)
        | X68 != relation_dom_restriction(X66,X67)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ relation(X66) )
      & ( ~ in(X71,X67)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X71,X72),X66)
        | in(ordered_pair(X71,X72),X68)
        | X68 != relation_dom_restriction(X66,X67)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ relation(X66) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_3(X66,X67,X68),esk2_3(X66,X67,X68)),X68)
        | ~ in(esk1_3(X66,X67,X68),X67)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_3(X66,X67,X68),esk2_3(X66,X67,X68)),X66)
        | X68 = relation_dom_restriction(X66,X67)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ relation(X66) )
      & ( in(esk1_3(X66,X67,X68),X67)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk1_3(X66,X67,X68),esk2_3(X66,X67,X68)),X68)
        | X68 = relation_dom_restriction(X66,X67)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ relation(X66) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_3(X66,X67,X68),esk2_3(X66,X67,X68)),X66)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk1_3(X66,X67,X68),esk2_3(X66,X67,X68)),X68)
        | X68 = relation_dom_restriction(X66,X67)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ relation(X66) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d11_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X81,X82] : ordered_pair(X81,X82) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X81,X82),singleton(X81)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
    | X4 != relation_dom_restriction(X3,X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X83,X84] :
      ( ~ relation(X83)
      | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X83,X84)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_relat_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X75,X76,X77,X78] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X75,X76)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X77,X78),X75)
        | in(ordered_pair(X77,X78),X76)
        | ~ relation(X76)
        | ~ relation(X75) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk3_2(X75,X76),esk4_2(X75,X76)),X75)
        | subset(X75,X76)
        | ~ relation(X76)
        | ~ relation(X75) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_2(X75,X76),esk4_2(X75,X76)),X76)
        | subset(X75,X76)
        | ~ relation(X76)
        | ~ relation(X75) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_relat_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3)
    | X4 != relation_dom_restriction(X3,X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X4) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X64,X65] : unordered_pair(X64,X65) = unordered_pair(X65,X64),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => subset(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t88_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk13_0)
    & ~ subset(relation_dom_restriction(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk13_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2))),X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( subset(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3)
    | in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk3_2(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3)),unordered_pair(esk3_2(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3),esk4_2(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3))),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_dom_restriction(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( subset(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SEU193+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:47:05 EDT 2026
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.30  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.70/1.80  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.70/1.80  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.70/1.80  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.70/1.80  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.70/1.80  % Total time : 1.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------