%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU195+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:28:28 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 244.19s 36.05s
% Output : CNFRefutation 244.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 151 ( 27 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 191 ( 75 ~; 96 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 88 ( 3 sgn 30 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d11_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1)
& in(X4,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& relation(X1) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t94_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t94_relat_1) ).
fof(t74_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
& in(X1,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
( ( ~ relation(X19)
| ~ relation(X21)
| X21 = relation_dom_restriction(X19,X20)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X19,X20,X21),esk4_3(X19,X20,X21)),X21)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X19,X20,X21),esk4_3(X19,X20,X21)),X19) )
& ( ~ relation(X19)
| ~ relation(X21)
| X21 = relation_dom_restriction(X19,X20)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X19,X20,X21),esk4_3(X19,X20,X21)),X21)
| in(esk3_3(X19,X20,X21),X20) )
& ( ~ relation(X19)
| ~ relation(X21)
| X21 = relation_dom_restriction(X19,X20)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X19,X20,X21),esk4_3(X19,X20,X21)),X19)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X19,X20,X21),X20)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X19,X20,X21),esk4_3(X19,X20,X21)),X21) )
& ( ~ relation(X19)
| ~ relation(X21)
| X21 != relation_dom_restriction(X19,X20)
| in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),X21)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),X19)
| ~ in(X24,X20) )
& ( ~ relation(X19)
| ~ relation(X21)
| X21 != relation_dom_restriction(X19,X20)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X22,X23),X21)
| in(ordered_pair(X22,X23),X19) )
& ( ~ relation(X19)
| ~ relation(X21)
| X21 != relation_dom_restriction(X19,X20)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X22,X23),X21)
| in(X22,X20) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d11_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( relation(relation_composition(X8,X9))
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t94_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X15,X16,X17,X18] :
( ( ~ relation(X18)
| in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),relation_composition(identity_relation(X17),X18))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),X18)
| ~ in(X15,X17) )
& ( ~ relation(X18)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),relation_composition(identity_relation(X17),X18))
| in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),X18) )
& ( ~ relation(X18)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),relation_composition(identity_relation(X17),X18))
| in(X15,X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t74_relat_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)),X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0) != relation_composition(identity_relation(esk1_0),esk2_0)
& relation(esk2_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ relation(X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),X4))
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)),X3)
| in(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X14] : relation(identity_relation(X14)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2))),X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2))),relation_composition(X1,X2))
| relation_composition(X1,X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X1)
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X4)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X4),X3))
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2))),esk2_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2))),relation_composition(X1,X2))
| relation_composition(X1,X2) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X4)
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X1)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_10]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)),X1)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)),X3)
| X3 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ relation(X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),esk2_0)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(X2)
| in(esk3_3(X2,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1)
| in(esk3_3(X2,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X3)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X1)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0))),esk2_0)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X2)
| in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1)
| ~ in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X2)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0))
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_16])]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0))
| relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0) != relation_composition(identity_relation(esk1_0),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SEU195+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.44 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:59:08 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 244.19/36.05 % Version: 3.5.1
% 244.19/36.05 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 244.19/36.05 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % new_bool_1 with pid 1514871 completed with status 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 244.19/36.05 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 244.19/36.05 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 244.19/36.05 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 244.19/36.05 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 244.19/36.05 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1514874 completed with status 8
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 1515435 completed with status 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 244.19/36.05 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 244.19/36.05 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 244.19/36.05 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 244.19/36.05 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 244.19/36.05 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1514874 completed with status 8
% 244.19/36.05 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 244.19/36.05 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 244.19/36.05
% 244.19/36.05 % Proof found!
% 244.19/36.05 % SZS status Theorem
% 244.19/36.05 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 244.19/36.05 % Parsed axioms : 33
% 244.19/36.05 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 15
% 244.19/36.05 % Initial clauses : 33
% 244.19/36.05 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 244.19/36.05 % Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 244.19/36.05 % Processed clauses : 10370
% 244.19/36.05 % ...of these trivial : 39
% 244.19/36.05 % ...subsumed : 7868
% 244.19/36.05 % ...remaining for further processing : 2463
% 244.19/36.05 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Backward-subsumed : 527
% 244.19/36.05 % Backward-rewritten : 206
% 244.19/36.05 % Generated clauses : 92433
% 244.19/36.05 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 89009
% 244.19/36.05 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 605
% 244.19/36.05 % Paramodulations : 92222
% 244.19/36.05 % Factorizations : 114
% 244.19/36.05 % NegExts : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Equation resolutions : 93
% 244.19/36.05 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Total rewrite steps : 48582
% 244.19/36.05 % ...of those cached : 48515
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional check models : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 244.19/36.05 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 244.19/36.05 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 244.19/36.05 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 244.19/36.05 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 244.19/36.05 % Current number of processed clauses : 1726
% 244.19/36.05 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 244.19/36.05 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Negative unit clauses : 16
% 244.19/36.05 % Non-unit-clauses : 1693
% 244.19/36.05 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76846
% 244.19/36.05 % ...number of literals in the above : 554417
% 244.19/36.05 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Current number of archived clauses : 737
% 244.19/36.05 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1571808
% 244.19/36.05 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 135394
% 244.19/36.05 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7050
% 244.19/36.05 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5349
% 244.19/36.05 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % BW rewrite match attempts : 91
% 244.19/36.05 % BW rewrite match successes : 19
% 244.19/36.05 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Condensation successes : 0
% 244.19/36.05 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2575421
% 244.19/36.05 % Search garbage collected termcells : 624
% 244.19/36.05
% 244.19/36.05 % -------------------------------------------------
% 244.19/36.05 % User time : 34.244 s
% 244.19/36.05 % System time : 0.871 s
% 244.19/36.05 % Total time : 35.114 s
% 244.19/36.05 % Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
% 244.19/36.05
% 244.19/36.05 % -------------------------------------------------
% 244.19/36.05 % User time : 34.247 s
% 244.19/36.05 % System time : 0.879 s
% 244.19/36.05 % Total time : 35.126 s
% 244.19/36.05 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 244.19/36.05 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------