%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU195+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 26.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 151 ( 27 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 191 ( 75 ~; 96 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 88 ( 5 sgn 30 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d11_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X2)
& in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t94_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t94_relat_1) ).
fof(t74_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t74_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X9,X10] :
( ( in(X9,X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X10),X8)
| X8 != relation_dom_restriction(X6,X7)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(X9,X10),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X10),X8)
| X8 != relation_dom_restriction(X6,X7)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X9,X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X10),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(X9,X10),X8)
| X8 != relation_dom_restriction(X6,X7)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),esk4_3(X6,X7,X8)),X8)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),esk4_3(X6,X7,X8)),X6)
| X8 = relation_dom_restriction(X6,X7)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),esk4_3(X6,X7,X8)),X8)
| X8 = relation_dom_restriction(X6,X7)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),esk4_3(X6,X7,X8)),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),esk4_3(X6,X7,X8)),X8)
| X8 = relation_dom_restriction(X6,X7)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d11_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t94_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( in(X5,X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),relation_composition(identity_relation(X7),X8))
| ~ relation(X8) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X8)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),relation_composition(identity_relation(X7),X8))
| ~ relation(X8) )
& ( ~ in(X5,X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X8)
| in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),relation_composition(identity_relation(X7),X8))
| ~ relation(X8) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t74_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X2 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X3,X2),esk4_3(X1,X3,X2)),X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X3,X2),esk4_3(X1,X3,X2)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk2_0)
& relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0) != relation_composition(identity_relation(esk1_0),esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( in(X2,X4)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),relation_composition(identity_relation(X4),X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X2 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X3,X2),esk4_3(X1,X3,X2)),X2)
| in(esk3_3(X1,X3,X2),X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X2] : relation(identity_relation(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( relation_composition(X1,X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2))),relation_composition(X1,X2))
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(X1,X2))),X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X4)
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),relation_composition(identity_relation(X4),X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(X1,X2) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2))),relation_composition(X1,X2))
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(X1,X2))),esk2_0)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X1)
| in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X4)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_10]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X2 = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X3,X2),esk4_3(X1,X3,X2)),X1)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X1,X3,X2),X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X3,X2),esk4_3(X1,X3,X2)),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),relation_composition(identity_relation(X4),X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
| ~ in(X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X3)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),esk2_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3)
| in(esk3_3(X2,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X3)
| in(esk3_3(X2,X3,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),esk4_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2))),X2)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X4)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X3,X4,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),esk4_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0))),esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X2)
| in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1)
| in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X2)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0))
| ~ in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X2)
| ~ in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_16])]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X1)
| in(esk3_3(esk2_0,X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)),X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0) != relation_composition(identity_relation(esk1_0),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk2_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU195+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:03:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.34/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/26.54 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.36/26.54
% 0.36/26.54 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.36/26.54 # OLD status Res
% 0.36/26.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.36/26.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.36/26.54 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.36/26.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/26.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.36/26.54
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof found!
% 0.36/26.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/26.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object total steps : 35
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object clause steps : 24
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object conjectures : 15
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object clause conjectures : 12
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object generating inferences : 13
% 0.36/26.54 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13
% 0.36/26.54 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.36/26.54 # Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.36/26.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 22
% 0.36/26.54 # Initial clauses : 23
% 0.36/26.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.36/26.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 0.36/26.54 # Processed clauses : 1251
% 0.36/26.54 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.36/26.54 # ...subsumed : 223
% 0.36/26.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 1027
% 0.36/26.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.36/26.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/26.54 # Backward-subsumed : 33
% 0.36/26.54 # Backward-rewritten : 128
% 0.36/26.54 # Generated clauses : 6979
% 0.36/26.54 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5109
% 0.36/26.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 646
% 0.36/26.54 # Paramodulations : 6756
% 0.36/26.54 # Factorizations : 134
% 0.36/26.54 # Equation resolutions : 89
% 0.36/26.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 866
% 0.36/26.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.36/26.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/26.54 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.36/26.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 859
% 0.36/26.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3505
% 0.36/26.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 76875
% 0.36/26.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/26.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 161
% 0.36/26.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3115961
% 0.36/26.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37550
% 0.36/26.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 902
% 0.36/26.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 592
% 0.36/26.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/26.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.36/26.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.36/26.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/26.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/26.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5616726
% 0.36/26.54
% 0.36/26.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/26.54 # User time : 2.803 s
% 0.36/26.54 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.36/26.54 # Total time : 2.816 s
% 0.36/26.54 # Maximum resident set size: 22208 pages
% 0.36/46.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/46.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------