%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SEU195+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:24:39 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 17.72s 2.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 17.72s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU195+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:11:14 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y % 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.12/0.37 # % 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 41 Number of unprocessed: 41 % 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.37 # 41 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures. % 0.12/0.37 # There are 2 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.37 # Found 17 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.12/0.37 # 2 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.37 # 24 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.37 # 17 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2 % 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 32 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.37 # We now have 32 tableaux to operate on % 17.72/2.62 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts. % 17.72/2.62 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 17.72/2.62 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 17.72/2.62 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 17.72/2.62 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations. % 17.72/2.62 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 17.72/2.62 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 17.72/2.62 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 17.72/2.62 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 17.72/2.62 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 17.72/2.62 # Begin clausification derivation % 17.72/2.62 % 17.72/2.62 # End clausification derivation % 17.72/2.62 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (empty(esk6_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (empty(esk7_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (relation(empty_set))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (relation(esk6_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (relation(esk8_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk11_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~empty(esk8_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~empty(esk9_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (relation(identity_relation(X1)))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (relation(X1)|~empty(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (~empty(singleton(X1)))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (element(esk5_1(X1),X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0)!=relation_dom_restriction(esk11_0,esk10_0))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X1)|~relation(X2))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X1)|~relation(X2))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(X1,X2)))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(X1,X2)|X4!=relation_dom_restriction(X5,X2)|~relation(X5)|~relation(X4)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~relation(X4)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),X4)))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3)|X4!=relation_dom_restriction(X3,X5)|~relation(X4)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X4))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X5)|X5!=relation_dom_restriction(X4,X2)|~relation(X5)|~relation(X4)|~in(X1,X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),relation_composition(identity_relation(X4),X3)))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),X4))|~relation(X4)|~in(X1,X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X1=X2|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X1)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X3=relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)|in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X3=relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X1))). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X3=relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X1)|~in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1))). % 17.72/2.62 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 17.72/2.62 # Begin printing tableau % 17.72/2.62 # Found 11 steps % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk11_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (relation(esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_189, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_3(esk11_0,esk10_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0)),esk2_3(esk11_0,esk10_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0))),singleton(esk1_3(esk11_0,esk10_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0)))),esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_46])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_314, plain, (~empty(esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_41])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_329, plain, (~element(esk5_1(esk11_0),esk11_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_191, plain, (~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_3(esk11_0,esk10_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0)),esk2_3(esk11_0,esk10_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0))),singleton(esk1_3(esk11_0,esk10_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0)))),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_4586, plain, (relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0)=relation_dom_restriction(esk11_0,esk10_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_48])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_4590, plain, (~relation(esk11_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_49])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_328, plain, (in(esk5_1(esk11_0),esk11_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_328, ...])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_4587, plain, (in(esk1_3(esk11_0,esk10_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0)),esk10_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_4587, ...])). % 17.72/2.62 cnf(i_0_4589, plain, (~relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_4589, ...])). % 17.72/2.62 # End printing tableau % 17.72/2.62 # SZS output end % 17.72/2.62 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 17.72/2.63 # Child (8066) has found a proof. % 17.72/2.63 % 17.72/2.63 # Proof search is over... % 17.72/2.63 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------