%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SEU196+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:54 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.37s 1.54s % Output : Refutation 1.37s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU196+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 09:12:52 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 1.37/1.54 % 1.37/1.54 SPASS V 3.9 % 1.37/1.54 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 1.37/1.54 % SZS status Theorem % 1.37/1.54 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.37/1.54 SPASS derived 118 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 365 clauses. % 1.37/1.54 SPASS allocated 104983 KBytes. % 1.37/1.54 SPASS spent 0:00:01.20 on the problem. % 1.37/1.54 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 1.37/1.54 0:00:01.09 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 1.37/1.54 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 1.37/1.54 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 1.37/1.54 0:00:00.02 for the reduction. % 1.37/1.54 % 1.37/1.54 % 1.37/1.54 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 : % 1.37/1.54 % SZS output start Refutation % 1.37/1.54 1[0:Inp] || -> relation(skc6)*. % 1.37/1.54 64[0:Inp] relation(u) || -> relation(relation_dom_restriction(u,v))*. % 1.37/1.54 72[0:Inp] || subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,skc7)),relation_rng(skc6))*l -> . % 1.37/1.54 92[0:Inp] relation(u) || -> subset(relation_dom_restriction(u,v),u)*l. % 1.37/1.54 232[0:Inp] relation(u) relation(v) || subset(v,u) -> subset(relation_rng(v),relation_rng(u))*. % 1.37/1.54 384[0:Res:1.0,92.0] || -> subset(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,u),skc6)*l. % 1.37/1.54 406[0:Res:1.0,64.0] || -> relation(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,u))*. % 1.37/1.54 457[0:Res:232.3,72.0] relation(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,skc7)) relation(skc6) || subset(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,skc7),skc6)*l -> . % 1.37/1.54 460[0:MRR:457.0,457.1,457.2,406.0,1.0,384.0] || -> . % 1.37/1.54 % SZS output end Refutation % 1.37/1.54 Formulae used in the proof : t99_relat_1 dt_k7_relat_1 t88_relat_1 t25_relat_1 % 1.37/1.54 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------