↑ Up

lazyCoP---0.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SEU196+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:53:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.60s 2.16s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU196+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 09:04:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 13.60/2.16  % SZS status Theorem
% 13.60/2.16  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation(sK96)).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c1, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation(sK96),
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 13.60/2.16  
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X0) | ~relation(X0)).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 13.60/2.16  	sK96 = X0).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c3, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	$false,
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c4, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X0),
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 13.60/2.16  
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c5, axiom,
% 13.60/2.16  	subset(relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X3)),relation_rng(X3)) | ~relation(X3) | ~relation(X2)).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation_composition(X2,X3) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X0)).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1) = X4).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c6, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	$false,
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c7, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	~relation(X3) | ~relation(X2),
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c8, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	subset(relation_rng(X4),relation_rng(X3)),
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 13.60/2.16  
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c9, axiom,
% 13.60/2.16  	~subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(sK96,sK95)),relation_rng(sK96))).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation_rng(X4) = relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(sK96,sK95))).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation_rng(X3) = relation_rng(sK96)).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c10, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	$false,
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4])], [c8, c9])).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c11, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	$false,
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4])], [c8, c9])).
% 13.60/2.16  
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c12, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation(sK96)).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 13.60/2.16  	X3 = sK96).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c13, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	~relation(X2),
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a5])], [c7, c12])).
% 13.60/2.16  
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c14, axiom,
% 13.60/2.16  	relation(identity_relation(X5))).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 13.60/2.16  	X2 = identity_relation(X5)).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c15, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	$false,
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c13, c14])).
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c16, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	$false,
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c13, c14])).
% 13.60/2.16  
% 13.60/2.16  cnf(c17, plain,
% 13.60/2.16  	$false,
% 13.60/2.16  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 13.60/2.16  		bind(X0, sK96),
% 13.60/2.16  		bind(X1, sK95),
% 13.60/2.16  		bind(X2, identity_relation(X1)),
% 13.60/2.16  		bind(X3, sK96),
% 13.60/2.16  		bind(X4, relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)),
% 13.60/2.16  		bind(X5, sK95)
% 13.60/2.16  	],
% 13.60/2.16  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6])).
% 13.60/2.16  
% 13.60/2.16  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------