%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU197+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 173.59s 29.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 173.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 158 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 199 ( 80 ~; 89 |; 16 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 78 ( 6 sgn 38 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_relat_1) ).
fof(t115_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)))
<=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(X3))
& in(X1,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_relat_1) ).
fof(d12_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X2)
& in(X5,X1) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).
fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X2,relation_rng(X3))
& in(X1,relation_dom(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23,X25,X26,X27,X29] :
( ( ~ relation(X21)
| X27 = relation_rng(X21)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_2(X21,X27),esk7_2(X21,X27)),X21)
| in(esk7_2(X21,X27),X27) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| X27 = relation_rng(X21)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X29,esk7_2(X21,X27)),X21)
| ~ in(esk7_2(X21,X27),X27) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| X22 != relation_rng(X21)
| in(X25,X22)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X26,X25),X21) )
& ( ~ relation(X21)
| X22 != relation_rng(X21)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X21,X22,X23),X23),X21)
| ~ in(X23,X22) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)))
<=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(X3))
& in(X1,X2) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t115_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)) )
& ( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| in(esk1_0,esk2_0) )
& ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))) )
& relation(esk3_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46] :
( ( ~ relation(X41)
| ~ relation(X42)
| X42 = relation_rng_restriction(X40,X41)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X40,X41,X42),esk10_3(X40,X41,X42)),X42)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X40,X41,X42),esk10_3(X40,X41,X42)),X41) )
& ( ~ relation(X41)
| ~ relation(X42)
| X42 = relation_rng_restriction(X40,X41)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X40,X41,X42),esk10_3(X40,X41,X42)),X42)
| in(esk10_3(X40,X41,X42),X40) )
& ( ~ relation(X41)
| ~ relation(X42)
| X42 = relation_rng_restriction(X40,X41)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X40,X41,X42),esk10_3(X40,X41,X42)),X41)
| ~ in(esk10_3(X40,X41,X42),X40)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X40,X41,X42),esk10_3(X40,X41,X42)),X42) )
& ( ~ relation(X41)
| ~ relation(X42)
| X42 != relation_rng_restriction(X40,X41)
| in(ordered_pair(X45,X46),X42)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X45,X46),X41)
| ~ in(X46,X40) )
& ( ~ relation(X41)
| ~ relation(X42)
| X42 != relation_rng_restriction(X40,X41)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X43,X44),X42)
| in(ordered_pair(X43,X44),X41) )
& ( ~ relation(X41)
| ~ relation(X42)
| X42 != relation_rng_restriction(X40,X41)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X43,X44),X42)
| in(X44,X40) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d12_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X49,X50] :
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X49,X50))
| ~ relation(X50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k8_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),X2),X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| in(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != relation_rng_restriction(X5,X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))
| in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != relation_rng_restriction(X2,X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X4)
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_20,lemma,
! [X33,X34,X35] :
( ( ~ relation(X35)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X33,X34),X35)
| in(X34,relation_rng(X35)) )
& ( ~ relation(X35)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X33,X34),X35)
| in(X33,relation_dom(X35)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_rng_restriction(X4,X3))
| ~ relation(X3)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| X5 != relation_rng_restriction(X2,X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X4)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X1),relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))
| ~ relation(X3)
| in(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,lemma,
( ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X2)
| in(X1,relation_rng(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ in(X2,X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,lemma,
in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(esk3_0,relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0),esk1_0),esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_30]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,lemma,
in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(esk3_0,relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,lemma,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_15]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SEU197+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.45 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:00:07 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 173.59/29.88 % Version: 3.5.1
% 173.59/29.88 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 173.59/29.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % new_bool_3 with pid 715113 completed with status 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 173.59/29.88 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 173.59/29.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 173.59/29.88 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 173.59/29.88 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 173.59/29.88 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % SubtermCWHack with pid 715117 completed with status 8
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 31s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % new_bool_3 with pid 715349 completed with status 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 173.59/29.88 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 173.59/29.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 173.59/29.88 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 173.59/29.88 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 173.59/29.88 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % SubtermCWHack with pid 715117 completed with status 8
% 173.59/29.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 31s (1) cores
% 173.59/29.88 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 173.59/29.88 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 173.59/29.88
% 173.59/29.88 % Proof found!
% 173.59/29.88 % SZS status Theorem
% 173.59/29.88 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 173.59/29.88 % Parsed axioms : 190
% 173.59/29.88 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 125
% 173.59/29.88 % Initial clauses : 123
% 173.59/29.88 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 173.59/29.88 % Initial clauses in saturation : 121
% 173.59/29.88 % Processed clauses : 6153
% 173.59/29.88 % ...of these trivial : 42
% 173.59/29.88 % ...subsumed : 4921
% 173.59/29.88 % ...remaining for further processing : 1190
% 173.59/29.88 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 162
% 173.59/29.88 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Backward-subsumed : 85
% 173.59/29.88 % Backward-rewritten : 56
% 173.59/29.88 % Generated clauses : 36234
% 173.59/29.88 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32721
% 173.59/29.88 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 49
% 173.59/29.88 % Paramodulations : 36045
% 173.59/29.88 % Factorizations : 22
% 173.59/29.88 % NegExts : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Equation resolutions : 164
% 173.59/29.88 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Total rewrite steps : 8044
% 173.59/29.88 % ...of those cached : 7779
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional check models : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 173.59/29.88 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 173.59/29.88 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 173.59/29.88 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 173.59/29.88 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 173.59/29.88 % Current number of processed clauses : 922
% 173.59/29.88 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 110
% 173.59/29.88 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Negative unit clauses : 46
% 173.59/29.88 % Non-unit-clauses : 766
% 173.59/29.88 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26316
% 173.59/29.88 % ...number of literals in the above : 109645
% 173.59/29.88 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Current number of archived clauses : 250
% 173.59/29.88 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 116639
% 173.59/29.88 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 80170
% 173.59/29.88 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2798
% 173.59/29.88 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2276
% 173.59/29.88 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % BW rewrite match attempts : 39
% 173.59/29.88 % BW rewrite match successes : 13
% 173.59/29.88 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Condensation successes : 0
% 173.59/29.88 % Termbank termtop insertions : 455039
% 173.59/29.88 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2801
% 173.59/29.88
% 173.59/29.88 % -------------------------------------------------
% 173.59/29.88 % User time : 27.765 s
% 173.59/29.88 % System time : 1.055 s
% 173.59/29.88 % Total time : 28.820 s
% 173.59/29.88 % Maximum resident set size: 4024 pages
% 173.59/29.88
% 173.59/29.88 % -------------------------------------------------
% 173.59/29.88 % User time : 27.771 s
% 173.59/29.88 % System time : 1.061 s
% 173.59/29.88 % Total time : 28.832 s
% 173.59/29.88 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 173.59/29.88 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------