↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:47:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.76s 1.52s
% Output   : Refutation 3.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  28   ~;  24   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (  40   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
      <=> ( in(X0,X1)
          & in(X0,relation_rng(X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_relat_1) ).

fof(f23,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t116_relat_1) ).

fof(f24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f23]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
      <=> ( in(X0,X1)
          & in(X0,relation_rng(X2)) ) )
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0)
      & relation(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
            | ~ in(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
          & in(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f54]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
          | ~ in(X0,X1)
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(X2)) )
        & ( ( in(X0,X1)
            & in(X0,relation_rng(X2)) )
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))) ) )
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
          | ~ in(X0,X1)
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(X2)) )
        & ( ( in(X0,X1)
            & in(X0,relation_rng(X2)) )
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))) ) )
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9)),sK8)
    & relation(sK9) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK8,sK9]),skolemize(X0,sK8),skolemize(X1,sK9)],[f43]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | in(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    relation(sK9),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9)),sK8),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    in(sK0(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9)),sK8),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f70,f96]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ~ in(sK0(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9)),sK8),sK8),
    inference(resolution,[],[f71,f96]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,sK9)))
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f93,f95]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    in(sK0(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9)),sK8),sK8),
    inference(resolution,[],[f168,f139]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f169,f144]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 04:05:34 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.76/1.52  % (5317)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 3.76/1.52  % (5322)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=2834161064:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5323)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=260549007:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5327)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=2879956703:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5326)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=9491858:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=3793039982:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5324)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=2088698587:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=2626421722:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)------------------------------
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)First to succeed.
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-5317"
% 3.76/1.52  % (5327)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.76/1.52  % (5326)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)------------------------------
% 3.76/1.52  % (5325)------------------------------
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.76/1.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.76/1.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)------------------------------
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)------------------------------
% 3.76/1.52  % (5328)------------------------------
% 3.76/1.52  % (5317)Success in time 0.441 s
% 3.76/1.52  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------