%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU198+2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Vvqhmb0Ugm true
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:53:47 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 218.84s 32.04s
% Output : Refutation 218.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 111 ( 9 ~; 9 |; 1 &; 86 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 ^; 24 !; 0 ?; 24 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_type,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(subset_type,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(relation_rng_restriction_type,type,
relation_rng_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__54_type,type,
sk__54: $i ).
thf(sk__26_type,type,
sk__26: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(relation_rng_type,type,
relation_rng: $i > $i ).
thf(sk__53_type,type,
sk__53: $i ).
thf(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( in @ C @ B ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl81,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( subset @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( in @ ( sk__26 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d3_tarski]) ).
thf(t115_relat_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( relation @ C )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ B @ C ) ) )
<=> ( ( in @ A @ B )
& ( in @ A @ ( relation_rng @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl227,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X0 @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
| ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( relation @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t115_relat_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3886,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) ) @ X2 )
| ( in @ ( sk__26 @ X2 @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) @ X1 )
| ~ ( relation @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl81,zip_derived_cl227]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl80,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( subset @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__26 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d3_tarski]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl102269,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( relation @ X1 )
| ( subset @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) ) @ X0 )
| ( subset @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) ) @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3886,zip_derived_cl80]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl102298,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( relation @ X1 ) ),
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl102269]) ).
thf(t116_relat_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( relation @ B )
=> ( subset @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ B ) ) @ A ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( relation @ B )
=> ( subset @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ B ) ) @ A ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t116_relat_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl229,plain,
~ ( subset @ ( relation_rng @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ sk__53 @ sk__54 ) ) @ sk__53 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl102357,plain,
~ ( relation @ sk__54 ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl102298,zip_derived_cl229]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl228,plain,
relation @ sk__54,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl102388,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl102357,zip_derived_cl228]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SEU198+2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Vvqhmb0Ugm true
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:04:23 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.32 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.32 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.32 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.32 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.10/0.33 % Running in FO mode
% 0.45/0.60 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.45/0.60 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.45/0.60 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.45/0.64 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.45/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.45/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.45/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 218.84/32.04 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 218.84/32.04 % BCE start: 343
% 218.84/32.04 % BCE eliminated: 4
% 218.84/32.04 % PE start: 339
% 218.84/32.04 logic: eq
% 218.84/32.04 % PE eliminated: 0
% 218.84/32.04 % done 6237 iterations in 31.368s
% 218.84/32.04 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 218.84/32.04 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 218.84/32.04
% 218.84/32.04
% 218.84/32.04 % Terminating...
% 219.53/32.19 % Runner terminated.
% 219.53/32.20 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------