↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU199+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:41:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 21.50s 4.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 21.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU199+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:48:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.50/4.79  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 21.50/4.79  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 21.50/4.79  fof(d12_relat_1, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((relation(X1) => ! [X2] : ((relation(X2) => (X2 = 'relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1) <=> ! [X3] : ! [X4] : ((in('ordered$upair'(X3,X4),X2) <=> (in(X4,X0) & in('ordered$upair'(X3,X4),X1)))))))))).
% 21.50/4.79  fof(d3_relat_1, axiom, ! [X0] : ((relation(X0) => ! [X1] : ((relation(X1) => (subset(X0,X1) <=> ! [X2] : ! [X3] : ((in('ordered$upair'(X2,X3),X0) => in('ordered$upair'(X2,X3),X1))))))))).
% 21.50/4.79  fof(dt_k8_relat_1, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((relation(X1) => relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1))))).
% 21.50/4.79  fof(t117_relat_1, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((relation(X1) => subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1),X1)))).
% 21.50/4.79  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((relation(X1) => subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1),X1))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [t117_relat_1])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(c3, plain, ~relation(X0) | ~relation(X1) | X2(X3,X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d12_relat_1])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(c8, plain, ~X0(X1,X2,X3) | 'relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X2) != X3 | ~in('ordered$upair'(X4,X5),X3) | in('ordered$upair'(X4,X5),X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d12_relat_1])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(c13, plain, ~relation(X0) | ~relation(X1) | subset(X0,X1) | in('ordered$upair'(sK18(X0,X1),sK19(X0,X1)),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_relat_1])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(c14, plain, ~relation(X0) | ~relation(X1) | subset(X0,X1) | ~in('ordered$upair'(sK18(X0,X1),sK19(X0,X1)),X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_relat_1])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(c16, plain, ~relation(X0) | relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [dt_k8_relat_1])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(c45, plain, relation(sK60), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(c46, plain, ~subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK59,sK60),sK60), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(d0, plain, ~in('ordered$upair'(X0,X1),'relation$urng$urestriction'(X2,X3)) | in('ordered$upair'(X0,X1),X3) | ~'Ts6'(X2,X3,'relation$urng$urestriction'(X2,X3)), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c8])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(d1, plain, in('ordered$upair'(sK18('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1),X2),sK19('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1),X2)),X1) | ~'Ts6'(X0,X1,'relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)) | ~relation(X2) | subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1),X2), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d0,c13])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(d2, plain, ~relation(X0) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | ~'Ts6'(X1,X0,'relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0),X0) | ~relation(X0) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0),X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d1,c14])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(d3, plain, ~relation(X0) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | ~relation(X0) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0),X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c3,d2])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(d4, plain, ~relation(X0) | ~relation(X0) | subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0),X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c16,d3])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(d5, plain, ~relation(sK60), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,c46])).
% 21.50/4.79  cnf(d6, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c45,d5])).
% 21.50/4.79  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------