%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.26s 2.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_231,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)),relation_rng(esk55_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8_nb20at/lgb.p',i_0_231) ).
cnf(i_0_250,lemma,
( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8_nb20at/lgb.p',i_0_250) ).
cnf(i_0_232,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk55_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8_nb20at/lgb.p',i_0_232) ).
cnf(i_0_230,lemma,
( subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8_nb20at/lgb.p',i_0_230) ).
cnf(i_0_157,plain,
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8_nb20at/lgb.p',i_0_157) ).
cnf(c_0_256,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)),relation_rng(esk55_0)),
i_0_231 ).
cnf(c_0_257,lemma,
( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
i_0_250 ).
cnf(c_0_258,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk55_0),
i_0_232 ).
cnf(c_0_259,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))
| ~ subset(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0),esk55_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_256,c_0_257]),c_0_258])]) ).
cnf(c_0_260,lemma,
( subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
i_0_230 ).
cnf(c_0_261,lemma,
~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_259,c_0_260]),c_0_258])]) ).
cnf(c_0_262,plain,
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2) ),
i_0_157 ).
cnf(c_0_263,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_261,c_0_262]),c_0_258])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09 % Problem : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.09 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:21:50 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.26/2.24 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.26/2.24 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.26/2.24 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.26/2.24 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.26/2.24 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.26/2.24 #
% 7.26/2.24 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 7.26/2.24 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.26/2.24
% 7.26/2.24 # Proof found!
% 7.26/2.24 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.26/2.24 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.26/2.24 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.26/2.24
% 7.26/2.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.26/2.24 # User time : 0.024 s
% 7.26/2.24 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.26/2.24 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 7.26/2.24 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.26/2.24
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------