%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:56 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.75s 1.92s % Output : Refutation 1.75s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:25:03 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : % 1.75/1.92 % 1.75/1.92 SPASS V 3.9 % 1.75/1.92 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 1.75/1.92 % SZS status Theorem % 1.75/1.92 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.75/1.92 SPASS derived 137 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 387 clauses. % 1.75/1.92 SPASS allocated 105838 KBytes. % 1.75/1.92 SPASS spent 0:00:01.56 on the problem. % 1.75/1.92 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 1.75/1.92 0:00:01.45 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 1.75/1.92 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 1.75/1.92 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 1.75/1.92 0:00:00.03 for the reduction. % 1.75/1.92 % 1.75/1.92 % 1.75/1.92 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 : % 1.75/1.92 % SZS output start Refutation % 1.75/1.92 1[0:Inp] || -> relation(skc6)*. % 1.75/1.92 65[0:Inp] relation(u) || -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(v,u))*. % 1.75/1.92 73[0:Inp] || subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(skc7,skc6)),relation_rng(skc6))*l -> . % 1.75/1.92 85[0:Inp] relation(u) || -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(v,u),u)*l. % 1.75/1.92 238[0:Inp] relation(u) relation(v) || subset(v,u) -> subset(relation_rng(v),relation_rng(u))*. % 1.75/1.92 407[0:Res:1.0,85.0] || -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc6),skc6)*l. % 1.75/1.92 432[0:Res:1.0,65.0] || -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc6))*. % 1.75/1.92 489[0:Res:238.3,73.0] relation(relation_rng_restriction(skc7,skc6)) relation(skc6) || subset(relation_rng_restriction(skc7,skc6),skc6)*l -> . % 1.75/1.92 492[0:MRR:489.0,489.1,489.2,432.0,1.0,407.0] || -> . % 1.75/1.92 % SZS output end Refutation % 1.75/1.92 Formulae used in the proof : t118_relat_1 dt_k8_relat_1 t117_relat_1 t25_relat_1 % 1.75/1.92 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------