↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU209+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  120 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  152 (  62   ~;  68   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (  13 sgn  43   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_tarski) ).

fof(d14_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( X3 = relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)
        <=> ! [X4] :
              ( in(X4,X3)
            <=> ? [X5] :
                  ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1)
                  & in(X5,X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d14_relat_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t167_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => subset(relation_inverse_image(X2,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t167_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
      ( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(X7,esk5_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
        | X6 != relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X9),X5)
        | in(X7,X6)
        | X6 != relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),X11),X5)
        | X6 = relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( in(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk7_2(X5,X6)),X5)
        | X6 = relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X4),singleton(X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X9,X11,X7,X8,X13] :
      ( ( in(ordered_pair(X9,esk1_4(X6,X7,X8,X9)),X6)
        | ~ in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(esk1_4(X6,X7,X8,X9),X7)
        | ~ in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X11),X6)
        | ~ in(X11,X7)
        | in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X13),X6)
        | ~ in(X13,X7)
        | X8 = relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),esk3_3(X6,X7,X8)),X6)
        | in(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | X8 = relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
        | in(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | X8 = relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d14_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : unordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X4,esk1_4(X1,X3,X2,X4)),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X4),singleton(X3)),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,esk1_4(X1,X3,X2,X4)),singleton(X4)),X1)
    | X2 != relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X4)),X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,esk1_4(X2,X3,X4,X1))),X2)
    | X4 != relation_inverse_image(X2,X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_inverse_image(X4,X5)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X4)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk4_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk4_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => subset(relation_inverse_image(X2,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t167_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk16_0)
    & ~ subset(relation_inverse_image(esk16_0,esk15_0),relation_dom(esk16_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subset(relation_inverse_image(X1,X2),X3)
    | in(esk4_2(relation_inverse_image(X1,X2),X3),X4)
    | X4 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_inverse_image(esk16_0,esk15_0),relation_dom(esk16_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( subset(relation_inverse_image(X1,X2),X3)
    | X3 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk16_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU209+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:56:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 30
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
% 0.24/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 40
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 58
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 49
% 0.24/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 1682
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.24/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 825
% 0.24/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 849
% 0.24/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 23
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 100
% 0.24/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 14852
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 12070
% 0.24/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 762
% 0.24/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 14635
% 0.24/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.24/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 80
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 676
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 68
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.24/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 53
% 0.24/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 554
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9635
% 0.24/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 51655
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 125
% 0.24/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 93021
% 0.24/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27535
% 0.24/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1430
% 0.24/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15401
% 0.24/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 92
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 50
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 300371
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41  # User time                : 0.290 s
% 0.24/1.41  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Total time               : 0.301 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 14576 pages
% 0.24/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------