↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU209+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 26.53s 4.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 26.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  127 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  140 (  54   ~;  52   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (   0 sgn  80   !;   8   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),singleton(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(f131,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))
      <=> ? [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            & in(ordered_pair(X0,X3),X2)
            & in(X3,relation_rng(X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t166_relat_1) ).

fof(f132,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => subset(relation_inverse_image(X1,X0),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t167_relat_1) ).

fof(f133,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => subset(relation_inverse_image(X1,X0),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f132]) ).

fof(f140,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( in(ordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
       => ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
          & in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_relat_1) ).

fof(f188,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(f232,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X0)
          | in(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f306,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ( in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))
      <=> ? [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            & in(ordered_pair(X0,X3),X2)
            & in(X3,relation_rng(X2)) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).

fof(f307,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
      & ~ subset(relation_inverse_image(X1,X0),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f133]) ).

fof(f313,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
      | ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
        & in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f314,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
      | ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
        & in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f313]) ).

fof(f431,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X0)
            | in(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X0)
            & ~ in(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f232]) ).

fof(f432,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ in(X3,X0)
            | in(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X0)
            & ~ in(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f431]) ).

fof(f433,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ in(X3,X0)
            | in(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( in(sK32(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ in(sK32(X0,X1),X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK32]),skolemize(X2,sK32(X0,X1))],[f432]) ).

fof(f484,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))
          | ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X1)
              & in(ordered_pair(X0,X3),X2)
              & in(X3,relation_rng(X2)) ) )
        & ( ! [X3] :
              ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(ordered_pair(X0,X3),X2)
              | ~ in(X3,relation_rng(X2)) )
          | in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f306]) ).

fof(f485,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))
          | ? [X4] :
              ( in(X4,X1)
              & in(ordered_pair(X0,X4),X2)
              & in(X4,relation_rng(X2)) ) )
        & ( ! [X3] :
              ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(ordered_pair(X0,X3),X2)
              | ~ in(X3,relation_rng(X2)) )
          | in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f484]) ).

fof(f486,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))
          | ( in(sK61(X0,X1,X2),X1)
            & in(ordered_pair(X0,sK61(X0,X1,X2)),X2)
            & in(sK61(X0,X1,X2),relation_rng(X2)) ) )
        & ( ! [X3] :
              ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(ordered_pair(X0,X3),X2)
              | ~ in(X3,relation_rng(X2)) )
          | in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK61]),skolemize(X4,sK61(X0,X1,X2))],[f485]) ).

fof(f487,plain,
    ( relation(sK63)
    & ~ subset(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK62,sK63]),skolemize(X0,sK62),skolemize(X1,sK63)],[f307]) ).

fof(f601,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(sK32(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f433]) ).

fof(f602,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(sK32(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f433]) ).

fof(f631,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),singleton(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f753,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))
      | in(ordered_pair(X0,sK61(X0,X1,X2)),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f486]) ).

fof(f756,plain,
    relation(sK63),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f487]) ).

fof(f757,plain,
    ~ subset(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f487]) ).

fof(f765,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
      | in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f314]) ).

fof(f833,plain,
    ! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f188]) ).

fof(f862,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f631,f833]) ).

fof(f958,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))
      | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,sK61(X0,X1,X2)),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),X2) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f753,f862]) ).

fof(f962,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),X2)
      | in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f765,f862]) ).

tcf(c_140,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(sK32(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f602]) ).

tcf(c_141,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | in(sK32(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f601]) ).

tcf(c_293,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,sK61(X0,X2,X1)),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f958]) ).

tcf(c_295,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f757]) ).

tcf(c_296,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK63),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f756]) ).

tcf(c_303,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f962]) ).

tcf(c_1150,plain,
    ( subset(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63))
    | in(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_141]) ).

tcf(c_1223,plain,
    ( subset(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63))
    | ~ in(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),relation_dom(sK63)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_140]) ).

tcf(c_2748,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),sK61(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),sK62,sK63)),unordered_pair(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)))),sK63)
    | ~ relation(sK63)
    | ~ in(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_293]) ).

tcf(c_11844,plain,
    ( in(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),relation_dom(sK63))
    | ~ relation(sK63)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),sK61(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),sK62,sK63)),unordered_pair(sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)),sK32(relation_inverse_image(sK63,sK62),relation_dom(sK63)))),sK63) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_303]) ).

tcf(c_11845,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_11844,c_2748,c_1223,c_1150,c_295,c_296]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU209+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:09:24 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.44  % Proving...
% 26.53/4.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 26.53/4.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 26.53/4.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 26.53/4.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e % 
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Proving...
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % 
% 26.53/4.28  % clauses                               326
% 26.53/4.28  % conjectures                           22
% 26.53/4.28  % EPR                                   32
% 26.53/4.28  % Horn                                  263
% 26.53/4.28  % unary                                 53
% 26.53/4.28  % binary                                105
% 26.53/4.28  % lits                                  870
% 26.53/4.28  % lits eq                               167
% 26.53/4.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 26.53/4.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 26.53/4.28  % fd_cond                               13
% 26.53/4.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        68
% 26.53/4.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ 
% 26.53/4.28  % Current options:
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ 
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % 
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % ------ Proving...
% 26.53/4.28  % 
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 26.53/4.28  
% 26.53/4.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------