↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU210+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.73s 0.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   60 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  168 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  189 (  81   ~;  71   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  104 (   7 sgn  51   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t6_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

fof(rc2_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] :
      ( empty(X2)
      & element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_subset_1) ).

fof(t5_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( empty(X3)
        & element(X2,powerset(X3))
        & in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t5_subset) ).

fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
    empty(empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(t166_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X3,X2))
      <=> ? [X4] :
            ( in(X4,X2)
            & in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X3)
            & in(X4,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t166_relat_1) ).

fof(t174_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ~ ( relation_inverse_image(X2,X1) = empty_set
          & subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
          & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t174_relat_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(fc4_relat_1,axiom,
    ( relation(empty_set)
    & empty(empty_set) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc4_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X66] :
      ( X66 = empty_set
      | ~ empty(X66) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_boole])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X43] :
      ( empty(esk10_1(X43))
      & element(esk10_1(X43),powerset(X43)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc2_subset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    empty(esk10_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X63,X64,X65] :
      ( ~ empty(X65)
      | ~ element(X64,powerset(X65))
      | ~ in(X63,X64) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t5_subset])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    element(esk10_1(X1),powerset(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    esk10_1(X1) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ epred1_0
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ empty(X1) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ epred2_0
  <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,empty_set) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X3)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    element(empty_set,powerset(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | epred1_0 ),
    inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    empty(empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fc1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18,X20,X21,X22,X24] :
      ( ( ~ relation(X16)
        | X22 = relation_rng(X16)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk4_2(X16,X22),esk3_2(X16,X22)),X16)
        | in(esk3_2(X16,X22),X22) )
      & ( ~ relation(X16)
        | X22 = relation_rng(X16)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,esk3_2(X16,X22)),X16)
        | ~ in(esk3_2(X16,X22),X22) )
      & ( ~ relation(X16)
        | X17 != relation_rng(X16)
        | in(X20,X17)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X21,X20),X16) )
      & ( ~ relation(X16)
        | X17 != relation_rng(X16)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X16,X17,X18),X18),X16)
        | ~ in(X18,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X26,X27] : ordered_pair(X26,X27) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X26,X27),singleton(X26)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X47,X48,X49,X51] :
      ( ( ~ relation(X49)
        | in(X47,relation_inverse_image(X49,X48))
        | ~ in(X51,X48)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X47,X51),X49)
        | ~ in(X51,relation_rng(X49)) )
      & ( ~ relation(X49)
        | ~ in(X47,relation_inverse_image(X49,X48))
        | in(esk12_3(X47,X48,X49),X48) )
      & ( ~ relation(X49)
        | ~ in(X47,relation_inverse_image(X49,X48))
        | in(ordered_pair(X47,esk12_3(X47,X48,X49)),X49) )
      & ( ~ relation(X49)
        | ~ in(X47,relation_inverse_image(X49,X48))
        | in(esk12_3(X47,X48,X49),relation_rng(X49)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t166_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => ~ ( relation_inverse_image(X2,X1) = empty_set
            & subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
            & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t174_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    epred1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 = relation_rng(X1)
    | in(ordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)),X1)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] : unordered_pair(X8,X9) = unordered_pair(X9,X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
    | in(X3,relation_inverse_image(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X3)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => ~ ( relation_inverse_image(X2,X1) = empty_set
            & subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
            & X1 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ epred2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X1)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | X2 = relation_rng(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X1),singleton(X3)),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | in(X3,relation_inverse_image(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),singleton(esk2_3(X3,X2,X1))),X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_31]) ).

fof(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( subset(X13,X14)
        | ~ in(esk1_2(X13,X14),X14) )
      & ( subset(X13,X14)
        | in(esk1_2(X13,X14),X13) )
      & ( in(X12,X11)
        | ~ in(X12,X10)
        | ~ subset(X10,X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_inverse_image(esk14_0,esk13_0) = empty_set
    & subset(esk13_0,relation_rng(esk14_0))
    & esk13_0 != empty_set
    & relation(esk14_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X2)
    | in(esk3_2(X2,X1),X1)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X2,X1),esk4_2(X2,X1)),singleton(esk4_2(X2,X1))),X2)
    | X1 = relation_rng(X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    relation(empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fc4_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ in(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_rng(X2))
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X1),singleton(X1)),X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk2_3(X2,relation_rng(X2),X1)),singleton(esk2_3(X2,relation_rng(X2),X1))),X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk13_0,relation_rng(esk14_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(empty_set,X1),X1)
    | X1 = relation_rng(empty_set) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | in(esk2_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    relation_inverse_image(esk14_0,esk13_0) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk13_0)
    | in(X1,relation_rng(esk14_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    relation_rng(empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(X1,esk13_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53])]),c_0_43]),c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(empty_set,X1),X1)
    | X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    esk13_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_58]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU210+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:00:29 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/0.85  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.73/0.85  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.73/0.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1123844 completed with status 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 2.73/0.85  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.73/0.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.73/0.85  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.73/0.85  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.73/0.85  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 113s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SE_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SE_S0Y with pid 1123853 completed with status 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Result found by G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SE_S0Y
% 2.73/0.85  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.73/0.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.73/0.85  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.73/0.85  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.73/0.85  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 113s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SE_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 2.73/0.85  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 2.73/0.85  
% 2.73/0.85  % Proof found!
% 2.73/0.85  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.73/0.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.73/0.85  % Parsed axioms                        : 40
% 2.73/0.85  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Initial clauses                      : 58
% 2.73/0.85  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 2.73/0.85  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 49
% 2.73/0.85  % Processed clauses                    : 2785
% 2.73/0.85  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 2.73/0.85  % ...subsumed                          : 2219
% 2.73/0.85  % ...remaining for further processing  : 565
% 2.73/0.85  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 2.73/0.85  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Backward-subsumed                    : 29
% 2.73/0.85  % Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 2.73/0.85  % Generated clauses                    : 19202
% 2.73/0.85  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16475
% 2.73/0.85  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11
% 2.73/0.85  % Paramodulations                      : 19107
% 2.73/0.85  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 2.73/0.85  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6306
% 2.73/0.85  % ...of those cached                   : 6246
% 2.73/0.85  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.73/0.85  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.73/0.85  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.73/0.85  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.73/0.85  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.73/0.85  % Current number of processed clauses  : 476
% 2.73/0.85  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 2.73/0.85  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 2.73/0.85  %    Negative unit clauses             : 58
% 2.73/0.85  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 392
% 2.73/0.85  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13633
% 2.73/0.85  % ...number of literals in the above   : 60789
% 2.73/0.85  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Current number of archived clauses   : 42
% 2.73/0.85  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 101844
% 2.73/0.85  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64458
% 2.73/0.85  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1622
% 2.73/0.85  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10191
% 2.73/0.85  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 2.73/0.85  % BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 2.73/0.85  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.73/0.85  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 231251
% 2.73/0.85  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 617
% 2.73/0.85  
% 2.73/0.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.73/0.85  % User time                : 0.373 s
% 2.73/0.85  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 2.73/0.85  % Total time               : 0.385 s
% 2.73/0.85  % Maximum resident set size: 3608 pages
% 2.73/0.85  
% 2.73/0.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.73/0.85  % User time                : 1.830 s
% 2.73/0.85  % System time              : 0.071 s
% 2.73/0.85  % Total time               : 1.901 s
% 2.73/0.85  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 2.73/0.85  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------