↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEU211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:43:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.40s 2.15s
% Output   : Proof 11.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 21:27:12 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.66  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.66  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.66  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.66  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.66  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.66  
% 0.19/0.66  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.66  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.66  
% 0.19/0.66  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.66  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.66                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.66  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.66  
% 0.19/0.66  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.66  
% 0.19/0.67  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.68  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.69  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.69  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.69  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.69  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.69  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.69  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.69  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.56/1.15  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.56/1.15  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.20  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.20  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.20  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.20  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.20  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.28/1.68  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.75/1.70  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.75/1.70  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.75/1.72  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 5.75/1.72  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 5.75/1.72  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 5.75/1.73  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.75/1.73  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.75/1.73  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.71/1.78  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.16/2.15  Prover 3: proved (1453ms)
% 9.40/2.15  
% 9.40/2.15  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.40/2.15  
% 9.40/2.15  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 9.40/2.15  Prover 6: stopped
% 9.40/2.15  Prover 2: stopped
% 9.40/2.15  Prover 5: stopped
% 9.40/2.16  Prover 0: stopped
% 9.40/2.16  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 9.40/2.16  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 9.40/2.16  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 9.40/2.16  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 9.40/2.19  Prover 1: Found proof (size 31)
% 9.40/2.19  Prover 1: proved (1508ms)
% 9.40/2.19  Prover 4: stopped
% 9.40/2.22  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 9.40/2.25  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 9.40/2.26  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 9.40/2.27  Prover 7: stopped
% 9.40/2.27  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 9.40/2.28  Prover 10: stopped
% 9.40/2.29  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 9.40/2.31  Prover 13: stopped
% 9.40/2.32  Prover 11: stopped
% 10.15/2.36  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.15/2.37  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.15/2.38  Prover 8: stopped
% 10.15/2.38  
% 10.15/2.38  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.15/2.38  
% 10.15/2.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.15/2.39  Assumptions after simplification:
% 10.15/2.39  ---------------------------------
% 10.15/2.39  
% 10.15/2.39    (d14_relat_1)
% 10.88/2.42     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (relation(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) | ( ? [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 10.88/2.42        :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v1 |  ~ (relation_inverse_image(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 10.88/2.42          $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: any] : (in(v4, v1) = v5 &
% 10.88/2.42            $i(v4) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ! [v6: $i] :  ! [v7: $i] : ( ~
% 10.88/2.42                (ordered_pair(v4, v6) = v7) |  ~ (in(v7, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v6) |  ?
% 10.88/2.42                [v8: int] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & in(v6, v2) = v8))) & (v5 = 0 |  ? [v6:
% 10.88/2.42                $i] :  ? [v7: $i] : (ordered_pair(v4, v6) = v7 & in(v7, v0) = 0 &
% 10.88/2.42                in(v6, v2) = 0 & $i(v7) & $i(v6))))) &  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.88/2.42        ( ~ (relation_inverse_image(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) | ( !
% 10.88/2.42            [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |
% 10.88/2.42               ! [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v5) = v6) |  ~
% 10.88/2.42                (in(v6, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v5) |  ? [v7: int] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 10.88/2.42                  in(v5, v1) = v7))) &  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (in(v3, v2) = 0) |  ~
% 10.88/2.42              $i(v3) |  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v5 &
% 10.88/2.42                in(v5, v0) = 0 & in(v4, v1) = 0 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))))))
% 10.88/2.42  
% 10.88/2.42    (d3_tarski)
% 10.88/2.42     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2)
% 10.88/2.42      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v3,
% 10.88/2.42          v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 10.88/2.42      (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v0)
% 10.88/2.42          = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | in(v2, v1) = 0))
% 10.88/2.42  
% 10.88/2.42    (t178_relat_1)
% 10.88/2.43     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 10.88/2.43      int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & subset(v3, v4) = v5 & subset(v0, v1) = 0 &
% 10.88/2.43      relation_inverse_image(v2, v1) = v4 & relation_inverse_image(v2, v0) = v3 &
% 10.88/2.43      relation(v2) = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.88/2.43  
% 10.88/2.43    (function-axioms)
% 10.88/2.43     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 10.88/2.43    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 10.88/2.43     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 10.88/2.43    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 10.88/2.43    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.88/2.43      (relation_inverse_image(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_inverse_image(v3, v2) =
% 10.88/2.43        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 10.88/2.43      ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 10.88/2.43      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.88/2.43      (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 10.88/2.43      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 10.88/2.43    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 10.88/2.43    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2)
% 10.88/2.43        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.88/2.43      (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool]
% 10.88/2.43    :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1)
% 10.88/2.43      |  ~ (relation(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 10.88/2.43      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 10.88/2.43      (empty(v2) = v0))
% 10.88/2.43  
% 10.88/2.43  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 10.88/2.43  --------------------------------------------
% 10.88/2.43  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, cc1_relat_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, d5_tarski,
% 10.88/2.43  dt_k10_relat_1, dt_k1_tarski, dt_k1_xboole_0, dt_k1_zfmisc_1, dt_k2_tarski,
% 10.88/2.43  dt_k4_tarski, dt_m1_subset_1, existence_m1_subset_1, fc1_subset_1, fc1_xboole_0,
% 10.88/2.43  fc1_zfmisc_1, fc2_subset_1, fc3_subset_1, fc4_relat_1, rc1_relat_1,
% 10.88/2.43  rc1_subset_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_relat_1, rc2_subset_1, rc2_xboole_0,
% 10.88/2.43  reflexivity_r1_tarski, t1_subset, t2_subset, t3_subset, t4_subset, t5_subset,
% 10.88/2.43  t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole
% 10.88/2.43  
% 10.88/2.43  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 10.88/2.43  ---------------------------------
% 10.88/2.43  
% 10.88/2.43  Begin of proof
% 10.88/2.43  | 
% 10.88/2.43  | ALPHA: (d3_tarski) implies:
% 10.88/2.43  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 10.88/2.44  |          $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | in(v2, v1)
% 10.88/2.44  |            = 0))
% 10.88/2.44  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1)
% 10.88/2.44  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 10.88/2.44  |            (v4 = 0) & in(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 10.88/2.44  | 
% 10.88/2.44  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 10.88/2.44  |   (3)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.88/2.44  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.88/2.44  | 
% 10.88/2.44  | DELTA: instantiating (t178_relat_1) with fresh symbols all_35_0, all_35_1,
% 10.88/2.44  |        all_35_2, all_35_3, all_35_4, all_35_5 gives:
% 10.88/2.44  |   (4)   ~ (all_35_0 = 0) & subset(all_35_2, all_35_1) = all_35_0 &
% 10.88/2.44  |        subset(all_35_5, all_35_4) = 0 & relation_inverse_image(all_35_3,
% 10.88/2.44  |          all_35_4) = all_35_1 & relation_inverse_image(all_35_3, all_35_5) =
% 10.88/2.44  |        all_35_2 & relation(all_35_3) = 0 & $i(all_35_1) & $i(all_35_2) &
% 10.88/2.44  |        $i(all_35_3) & $i(all_35_4) & $i(all_35_5)
% 10.88/2.44  | 
% 10.88/2.44  | ALPHA: (4) implies:
% 10.88/2.44  |   (5)   ~ (all_35_0 = 0)
% 10.88/2.44  |   (6)  $i(all_35_5)
% 10.88/2.44  |   (7)  $i(all_35_4)
% 10.88/2.44  |   (8)  $i(all_35_3)
% 10.88/2.44  |   (9)  $i(all_35_2)
% 10.88/2.44  |   (10)  $i(all_35_1)
% 10.88/2.44  |   (11)  relation(all_35_3) = 0
% 10.88/2.44  |   (12)  relation_inverse_image(all_35_3, all_35_5) = all_35_2
% 10.88/2.44  |   (13)  relation_inverse_image(all_35_3, all_35_4) = all_35_1
% 10.88/2.44  |   (14)  subset(all_35_5, all_35_4) = 0
% 10.88/2.44  |   (15)  subset(all_35_2, all_35_1) = all_35_0
% 10.88/2.44  | 
% 10.88/2.44  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d14_relat_1) with all_35_3, simplifying with (8),
% 10.88/2.44  |              (11) gives:
% 10.88/2.45  |   (16)   ? [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v2 = v0 |  ~
% 10.88/2.45  |           (relation_inverse_image(all_35_3, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0)
% 10.88/2.45  |           |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] : (in(v3, v0) = v4 & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v4 =
% 10.88/2.45  |                 0) |  ! [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v5) =
% 10.88/2.45  |                   v6) |  ~ (in(v6, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v5) |  ? [v7: int] :
% 10.88/2.45  |                 ( ~ (v7 = 0) & in(v5, v1) = v7))) & (v4 = 0 |  ? [v5: $i] :  ?
% 10.88/2.45  |               [v6: $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v5) = v6 & in(v6, all_35_3) = 0 &
% 10.88/2.45  |                 in(v5, v1) = 0 & $i(v6) & $i(v5))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 10.88/2.45  |           $i] : ( ~ (relation_inverse_image(all_35_3, v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v1) | 
% 10.88/2.45  |           ~ $i(v0) | ( ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (in(v2, v1) =
% 10.88/2.45  |                 v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 10.88/2.45  |                 (ordered_pair(v2, v4) = v5) |  ~ (in(v5, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~
% 10.88/2.45  |                 $i(v4) |  ? [v6: int] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & in(v4, v0) = v6))) &  !
% 10.88/2.45  |             [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ?
% 10.88/2.45  |               [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4 & in(v4, all_35_3) = 0 &
% 10.88/2.45  |                 in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3)))))
% 10.88/2.45  | 
% 10.88/2.45  | ALPHA: (16) implies:
% 10.88/2.45  |   (17)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_inverse_image(all_35_3, v0)
% 10.88/2.45  |             = v1) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | ( ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3
% 10.88/2.45  |               = 0 |  ~ (in(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 10.88/2.45  |                 $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v4) = v5) |  ~ (in(v5, all_35_3) =
% 10.88/2.45  |                   0) |  ~ $i(v4) |  ? [v6: int] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & in(v4, v0) =
% 10.88/2.45  |                   v6))) &  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ?
% 10.88/2.45  |               [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4 & in(v4,
% 10.88/2.45  |                   all_35_3) = 0 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3)))))
% 10.88/2.45  | 
% 10.88/2.45  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_35_5, all_35_4, simplifying with (6),
% 10.88/2.45  |              (7), (14) gives:
% 10.88/2.45  |   (18)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_35_5) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) | in(v0,
% 10.88/2.45  |             all_35_4) = 0)
% 10.88/2.45  | 
% 10.88/2.45  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_35_2, all_35_1, all_35_0, simplifying
% 10.88/2.45  |              with (9), (10), (15) gives:
% 10.88/2.45  |   (19)  all_35_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 10.88/2.45  |             all_35_1) = v1 & in(v0, all_35_2) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 10.88/2.45  | 
% 10.88/2.45  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_35_5, all_35_2, simplifying with (6),
% 10.88/2.45  |              (9), (12) gives:
% 10.88/2.45  |   (20)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_2) = v1) |  ~
% 10.88/2.45  |           $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3)
% 10.88/2.45  |             |  ~ (in(v3, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 =
% 10.88/2.45  |                 0) & in(v2, all_35_5) = v4))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 10.88/2.45  |               all_35_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 10.88/2.45  |           (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_3) = 0 & in(v1, all_35_5)
% 10.88/2.45  |             = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 10.88/2.45  | 
% 10.88/2.45  | ALPHA: (20) implies:
% 11.20/2.46  |   (21)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_35_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : 
% 11.20/2.46  |           ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_3) = 0 &
% 11.20/2.46  |             in(v1, all_35_5) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 11.20/2.46  | 
% 11.20/2.46  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_35_4, all_35_1, simplifying with (7),
% 11.20/2.46  |              (10), (13) gives:
% 11.20/2.46  |   (22)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_1) = v1) |  ~
% 11.20/2.46  |           $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3)
% 11.20/2.46  |             |  ~ (in(v3, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 =
% 11.20/2.46  |                 0) & in(v2, all_35_4) = v4))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 11.20/2.46  |               all_35_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 11.20/2.46  |           (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_3) = 0 & in(v1, all_35_4)
% 11.20/2.46  |             = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 11.20/2.46  | 
% 11.20/2.46  | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 11.20/2.46  |   (23)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_1) = v1) |  ~
% 11.20/2.46  |           $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3)
% 11.20/2.46  |             |  ~ (in(v3, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 =
% 11.20/2.46  |                 0) & in(v2, all_35_4) = v4)))
% 11.20/2.46  | 
% 11.20/2.46  | BETA: splitting (19) gives:
% 11.20/2.46  | 
% 11.20/2.46  | Case 1:
% 11.20/2.46  | | 
% 11.20/2.46  | |   (24)  all_35_0 = 0
% 11.20/2.46  | | 
% 11.20/2.46  | | REDUCE: (5), (24) imply:
% 11.20/2.46  | |   (25)  $false
% 11.20/2.46  | | 
% 11.20/2.46  | | CLOSE: (25) is inconsistent.
% 11.20/2.46  | | 
% 11.20/2.46  | Case 2:
% 11.20/2.46  | | 
% 11.20/2.46  | |   (26)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0, all_35_1) = v1 &
% 11.20/2.46  | |           in(v0, all_35_2) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 11.24/2.46  | | 
% 11.24/2.46  | | DELTA: instantiating (26) with fresh symbols all_62_0, all_62_1 gives:
% 11.24/2.46  | |   (27)   ~ (all_62_0 = 0) & in(all_62_1, all_35_1) = all_62_0 & in(all_62_1,
% 11.24/2.46  | |           all_35_2) = 0 & $i(all_62_1)
% 11.24/2.46  | | 
% 11.24/2.46  | | ALPHA: (27) implies:
% 11.24/2.46  | |   (28)   ~ (all_62_0 = 0)
% 11.24/2.46  | |   (29)  $i(all_62_1)
% 11.24/2.46  | |   (30)  in(all_62_1, all_35_2) = 0
% 11.24/2.46  | |   (31)  in(all_62_1, all_35_1) = all_62_0
% 11.24/2.46  | | 
% 11.24/2.46  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_62_1, simplifying with (29), (30)
% 11.24/2.46  | |              gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | |   (32)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (ordered_pair(all_62_1, v0) = v1 &
% 11.24/2.47  | |           in(v1, all_35_3) = 0 & in(v0, all_35_5) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 11.24/2.47  | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (23) with all_62_1, all_62_0, simplifying with
% 11.24/2.47  | |              (29), (31) gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | |   (33)  all_62_0 = 0 |  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 11.24/2.47  | |           (ordered_pair(all_62_1, v0) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~
% 11.24/2.47  | |           $i(v0) |  ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & in(v0, all_35_4) = v2))
% 11.24/2.47  | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | DELTA: instantiating (32) with fresh symbols all_73_0, all_73_1 gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | |   (34)  ordered_pair(all_62_1, all_73_1) = all_73_0 & in(all_73_0, all_35_3)
% 11.24/2.47  | |         = 0 & in(all_73_1, all_35_5) = 0 & $i(all_73_0) & $i(all_73_1)
% 11.24/2.47  | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | ALPHA: (34) implies:
% 11.24/2.47  | |   (35)  $i(all_73_1)
% 11.24/2.47  | |   (36)  in(all_73_1, all_35_5) = 0
% 11.24/2.47  | |   (37)  in(all_73_0, all_35_3) = 0
% 11.24/2.47  | |   (38)  ordered_pair(all_62_1, all_73_1) = all_73_0
% 11.24/2.47  | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | Case 1:
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (39)  all_62_0 = 0
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | REDUCE: (28), (39) imply:
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (40)  $false
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | CLOSE: (40) is inconsistent.
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | Case 2:
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (41)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(all_62_1, v0) = v1)
% 11.24/2.47  | | |           |  ~ (in(v1, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2
% 11.24/2.47  | | |               = 0) & in(v0, all_35_4) = v2))
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (18) with all_73_1, simplifying with (35), (36)
% 11.24/2.47  | | |              gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (42)  in(all_73_1, all_35_4) = 0
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (41) with all_73_1, all_73_0, simplifying with
% 11.24/2.47  | | |              (35), (37), (38) gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (43)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(all_73_1, all_35_4) = v0)
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | DELTA: instantiating (43) with fresh symbol all_92_0 gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (44)   ~ (all_92_0 = 0) & in(all_73_1, all_35_4) = all_92_0
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (45)   ~ (all_92_0 = 0)
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (46)  in(all_73_1, all_35_4) = all_92_0
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with 0, all_92_0, all_35_4, all_73_1,
% 11.24/2.47  | | |              simplifying with (42), (46) gives:
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (47)  all_92_0 = 0
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | REDUCE: (45), (47) imply:
% 11.24/2.47  | | |   (48)  $false
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | | CLOSE: (48) is inconsistent.
% 11.24/2.47  | | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | | End of split
% 11.24/2.47  | | 
% 11.24/2.47  | End of split
% 11.24/2.47  | 
% 11.24/2.47  End of proof
% 11.24/2.47  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.24/2.47  
% 11.24/2.47  1809ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------