↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU213+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.39s 24.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  344 (  56 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   38 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  501 ( 215   ~; 223   |;  38   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   4 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  163 (  12 sgn  60   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).

fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( relation(X3)
             => ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
              <=> ! [X4,X5] :
                    ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
                  <=> ? [X6] :
                        ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1)
                        & in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_1) ).

fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & relation(X2) )
     => relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).

fof(d4_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
           => ( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
            <=> in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ) )
          & ( ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
           => ( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
            <=> X3 = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1) ).

fof(t21_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( ( relation(X3)
            & function(X3) )
         => ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
          <=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
              & in(apply(X3,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1) ).

fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
       => ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
          & in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t20_relat_1) ).

fof(t8_funct_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( relation(X3)
        & function(X3) )
     => ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
      <=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
          & X2 = apply(X3,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t8_funct_1) ).

fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1)
        & relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
        & function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
      ( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(X7,esk5_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
        | X6 != relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X9),X5)
        | in(X7,X6)
        | X6 != relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),X11),X5)
        | X6 = relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( in(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk7_2(X5,X6)),X5)
        | X6 = relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X10,X11,X13,X16] :
      ( ( in(ordered_pair(X10,esk8_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11)),X7)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
        | X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
        | ~ relation(X9)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk8_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11),X11),X8)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
        | X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
        | ~ relation(X9)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X13),X7)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X13,X11),X8)
        | in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
        | X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
        | ~ relation(X9)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X7,X8,X9),esk10_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X7,X8,X9),X16),X7)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X16,esk10_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
        | X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
        | ~ relation(X9)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X7,X8,X9),esk11_3(X7,X8,X9)),X7)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X7,X8,X9),esk10_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
        | X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
        | ~ relation(X9)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk11_3(X7,X8,X9),esk10_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X7,X8,X9),esk10_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
        | X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
        | ~ relation(X9)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ relation(X7) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X4,esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X4,X5)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X4)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X6),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X3,esk5_3(X1,X2,X3)),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X3)
      | ~ relation(X4)
      | relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X6,X5,X6,X6] :
      ( ( X6 != apply(X4,X5)
        | in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X4)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X4)
        | X6 = apply(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( X6 != apply(X4,X5)
        | X6 = empty_set
        | in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( X6 != empty_set
        | X6 = apply(X4,X5)
        | in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X4,X5)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X4)
    | X6 != relation_dom(X3)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ in(X1,X6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( relation(X2)
          & function(X2) )
       => ! [X3] :
            ( ( relation(X3)
              & function(X3) )
           => ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
            <=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
                & in(apply(X3,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t21_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | X3 != apply(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_dom(relation_composition(X4,X5))
    | X2 != relation_dom(X4)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk2_0)
    & function(esk2_0)
    & relation(esk3_0)
    & function(esk3_0)
    & ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
      | ~ in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
      | ~ in(apply(esk3_0,esk1_0),relation_dom(esk2_0)) )
    & ( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
      | in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))) )
    & ( in(apply(esk3_0,esk1_0),relation_dom(esk2_0))
      | in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(X5,relation_rng(X6))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk5_3(X2,X3,X4)),X5)
    | X5 != relation_composition(X6,X2)
    | X3 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X6)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X6)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,apply(X2,X1)),X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
    | in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,lemma,
    ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk5_3(X2,X3,apply(X4,X1))),X5)
    | X5 != relation_composition(X4,X2)
    | X3 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ function(X4)
    | ~ in(apply(X4,X1),X3)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
    | in(esk1_0,X1)
    | X1 != relation_dom(esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | X2 != relation_composition(X3,X4)
    | X5 != relation_dom(X4)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ in(apply(X3,X1),X5)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
    | in(apply(esk3_0,esk1_0),relation_dom(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

fof(c_0_37,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( X5 = apply(X6,X4)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
        | X5 != apply(X6,X4)
        | in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_funct_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
    | in(esk1_0,relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(esk2_0) != relation_dom(X2)
    | X1 != relation_composition(esk3_0,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_28]),c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
    ( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
    | in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,X1)))
    | relation_dom(esk2_0) != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk3_0,X1))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,lemma,
    ( in(esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),relation_dom(X2))
    | X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,lemma,
    ( esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) = apply(X1,X4)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(apply(esk3_0,esk1_0),relation_dom(esk2_0))
    | ~ in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
    | ~ in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
    | in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,X1)))
    | relation_dom(esk2_0) != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_17]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,lemma,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
    | X4 != relation_composition(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X5),X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
    | ~ in(apply(esk3_0,esk1_0),relation_dom(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,lemma,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
    | X4 != relation_composition(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X4)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(apply(esk3_0,esk1_0),relation_dom(esk2_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,lemma,
    ( in(apply(X1,esk1_0),relation_dom(X2))
    | relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) != relation_composition(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_48]) ).

fof(c_0_52,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( relation(relation_composition(X3,X4))
        | ~ relation(X3)
        | ~ function(X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( function(relation_composition(X3,X4))
        | ~ relation(X3)
        | ~ function(X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ relation(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_29]),c_0_28]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( function(relation_composition(X2,X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relation(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_35]),c_0_55])]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_17]),c_0_29]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU213+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:09:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.38/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/24.58  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.39/24.58  
% 0.39/24.58  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.39/24.58  # OLD status Res
% 0.39/24.58  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.39/24.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 0.39/24.58  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.39/24.58  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.39/24.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 0.39/24.58  
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof found!
% 0.39/24.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.39/24.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object total steps             : 58
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object clause steps            : 41
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object conjectures             : 21
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 18
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 17
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object generating inferences   : 22
% 0.39/24.58  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 28
% 0.39/24.58  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.39/24.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 217
% 0.39/24.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 193
% 0.39/24.58  # Initial clauses                      : 54
% 0.39/24.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.39/24.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 54
% 0.39/24.58  # Processed clauses                    : 475
% 0.39/24.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.39/24.58  # ...subsumed                          : 49
% 0.39/24.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 418
% 0.39/24.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.39/24.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.39/24.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 0.39/24.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 40
% 0.39/24.58  # Generated clauses                    : 4320
% 0.39/24.58  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4121
% 0.39/24.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 71
% 0.39/24.58  # Paramodulations                      : 4278
% 0.39/24.58  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.39/24.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 36
% 0.39/24.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 367
% 0.39/24.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.39/24.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.39/24.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.39/24.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 352
% 0.39/24.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3208
% 0.39/24.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 34623
% 0.39/24.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.39/24.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 51
% 0.39/24.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 81329
% 0.39/24.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7182
% 0.39/24.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 130
% 0.39/24.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.39/24.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.39/24.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.39/24.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.39/24.58  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.39/24.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.39/24.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 163671
% 0.39/24.58  
% 0.39/24.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/24.58  # User time                : 0.231 s
% 0.39/24.58  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.39/24.58  # Total time               : 0.241 s
% 0.39/24.58  # Maximum resident set size: 8640 pages
% 0.39/46.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/46.44  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/46.44  
% 0.39/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------