%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU215+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:12:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
relation(sK8),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
function(sK8),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
relation(sK9),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
function(sK9),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
~ sPE(apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7),apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ function(sK8)
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| relation(relation_composition(sK8,sK9)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ function(sK8)
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| function(relation_composition(sK8,sK9)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7),empty_set)
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| sPE(apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7),apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7)))
| in(apply(sK8,sK7),relation_dom(sK9)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ in(sK7,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK8,sK9)))
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ function(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| sPE(apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7),apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t22_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8))
| ~ in(apply(sK8,sK7),relation_dom(sK9))
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ function(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| in(sK7,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK8,sK9))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7),apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7))
| ~ function(relation_composition(sK8,sK9))
| ~ relation(relation_composition(sK8,sK9))
| sPE(apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7),empty_set)
| in(sK7,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK8,sK9))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
sPE(apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7),apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU215+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 08:03:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.40 % symbols: 25
% 0.13/0.40 % clauses: 70
% 0.13/0.40 % start clauses: 6
% 0.13/0.40 % iterative deepening steps: 116
% 0.13/0.40 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.13/0.40 % literal attempts: 128848
% 0.13/0.40 % depth failures: 107870
% 0.13/0.40 % regularity failures: 286
% 0.13/0.40 % tautology failures: 1826
% 0.13/0.40 % reductions: 8349
% 0.13/0.40 % extensions: 120023
% 0.13/0.40 % SAT variables: 8100
% 0.13/0.40 % SAT clauses: 11152
% 0.13/0.40 % WalkSAT solutions: 11150
% 0.13/0.40 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------