%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SEU215+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.76s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 21
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 81 ( 28 unt; 5 def)
% Number of atoms : 359 ( 57 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 372 ( 148 ~; 155 |; 44 &)
% ( 9 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 6 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 96 ( 0 sgn 90 !; 6 ?; 21 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
=> ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
<=> X2 = empty_set ) )
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
=> ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
<=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X0) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1)
& function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( function(relation_composition(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1) ).
fof(f32,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
=> apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t22_funct_1) ).
fof(f33,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).
fof(f34,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f33]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ! [X1,X2] :
( ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
<=> X2 = empty_set ) )
& ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
<=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ! [X1,X2] :
( ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
<=> X2 = empty_set ) )
& ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
<=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f49]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0)
| relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0)
| relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f51]) ).
fof(f55,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ( function(relation_composition(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ( function(relation_composition(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f64,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).
fof(f65,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f67,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( function(X1)
& relation(X1)
& ? [X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) != apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f69,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( function(X1)
& relation(X1)
& ? [X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) != apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f68]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ! [X1,X2] :
( ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ( ( apply(X0,X1) != X2
| X2 = empty_set )
& ( empty_set != X2
| X2 = apply(X0,X1) ) ) )
& ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ( ( apply(X0,X1) != X2
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
| X2 = apply(X0,X1) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f89]) ).
fof(f91,plain,
( function(sK10)
& relation(sK10)
& function(sK11)
& relation(sK11)
& in(sK9,relation_dom(sK10))
& apply(relation_composition(sK10,sK11),sK9) != apply(sK11,apply(sK10,sK9)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK9,sK10,sK11]),skolemize(X0,sK9),skolemize(X1,sK10),skolemize(X2,sK11)],[f69]) ).
fof(f96,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| apply(X0,X1) != X2
| empty_set = X2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0)
| relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).
fof(f107,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| function(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f138,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f139,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).
fof(f140,plain,
function(sK10),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
relation(sK10),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f142,plain,
function(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f143,plain,
relation(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f144,plain,
in(sK9,relation_dom(sK10)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f145,plain,
apply(relation_composition(sK10,sK11),sK9) != apply(sK11,apply(sK10,sK9)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f158,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| apply(X0,X1) = empty_set ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f96]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ( apply(X0,X1) = empty_set )
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X0))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).
tcf(c_64,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( function(relation_composition(X1,X0))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).
tcf(c_92,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X2)))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(apply(X0,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).
tcf(c_95,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) )
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).
tcf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
apply(relation_composition(sK10,sK11),sK9) != apply(sK11,apply(sK10,sK9)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f145]) ).
tcf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
in(sK9,relation_dom(sK10)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
tcf(c_98,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f143]) ).
tcf(c_99,negated_conjecture,
function(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).
tcf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK10),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).
tcf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
function(sK10),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).
tcf(c_1032,definition,
iPr_def_10 = relation_dom(sK10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1033,definition,
iPr_def_11 = relation_composition(sK10,sK11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1034,definition,
iPr_def_12 = apply(iPr_def_11,sK9),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1035,definition,
iPr_def_13 = apply(sK10,sK9),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1036,definition,
iPr_def_14 = apply(sK11,iPr_def_13),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1037,negated_conjecture,
function(sK10),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_101]) ).
tcf(c_1038,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK10),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_100]) ).
tcf(c_1039,negated_conjecture,
function(sK11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).
tcf(c_1040,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98]) ).
tcf(c_1041,negated_conjecture,
in(sK9,iPr_def_10),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_1032]) ).
tcf(c_1042,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_1035,c_1036,c_1033,c_1034]) ).
tcf(c_1966,plain,
( relation(iPr_def_11)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1033,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_1967,plain,
relation(iPr_def_11),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1966,c_1040,c_1038]) ).
tcf(c_2257,plain,
( function(iPr_def_11)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK10)
| ~ function(sK11)
| ~ function(sK10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1033,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_2258,plain,
function(iPr_def_11),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2257,c_1040,c_1038,c_1039,c_1037]) ).
tcf(c_2497,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(sK9,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK10,X0)))
| ~ relation(sK10)
| ~ function(sK10)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(sK9,relation_dom(sK10))
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1035,c_92]) ).
tcf(c_2523,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(sK9,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK10,X0)))
| ~ relation(sK10)
| ~ function(sK10)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(sK9,iPr_def_10)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2497,c_1032]) ).
tcf(c_2524,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(sK9,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK10,X0)))
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2523,c_1038,c_1037,c_1041]) ).
tcf(c_2577,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(relation_composition(sK10,sK11),X0) = apply(sK11,apply(sK10,X0)) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK10)
| ~ function(sK11)
| ~ function(sK10)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_11)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1033,c_95]) ).
tcf(c_2578,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(sK11,apply(sK10,X0)) = apply(iPr_def_11,X0) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK10)
| ~ function(sK11)
| ~ function(sK10)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_11)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2577,c_1033]) ).
tcf(c_2579,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(sK11,apply(sK10,X0)) = apply(iPr_def_11,X0) )
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_11)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2578,c_1040,c_1038,c_1039,c_1037]) ).
tcf(c_2719,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(iPr_def_11,X0) = empty_set )
| ( apply(sK11,apply(sK10,X0)) = apply(iPr_def_11,X0) )
| ~ relation(iPr_def_11)
| ~ function(iPr_def_11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_2579]) ).
tcf(c_2724,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(iPr_def_11,X0) = empty_set )
| ( apply(sK11,apply(sK10,X0)) = apply(iPr_def_11,X0) ) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2719,c_1967,c_2258]) ).
tcf(c_2741,plain,
( in(sK9,relation_dom(iPr_def_11))
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(sK11)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1033,c_2524]) ).
tcf(c_2748,plain,
( in(sK9,relation_dom(iPr_def_11))
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(sK11)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2741,c_1040,c_1039]) ).
tcf(c_2779,plain,
( in(sK9,relation_dom(iPr_def_11))
| ( apply(sK11,iPr_def_13) = empty_set )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_2748]) ).
tcf(c_2780,plain,
( in(sK9,relation_dom(iPr_def_11))
| ( empty_set = iPr_def_14 )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2779,c_1036]) ).
tcf(c_2781,plain,
( in(sK9,relation_dom(iPr_def_11))
| ( empty_set = iPr_def_14 ) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2780,c_1040,c_1039]) ).
tcf(c_2799,plain,
( ( empty_set = iPr_def_14 )
| ( apply(sK11,apply(sK10,sK9)) = apply(iPr_def_11,sK9) ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2781,c_2579]) ).
tcf(c_2809,plain,
( ( iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_14 )
| ( empty_set = iPr_def_14 ) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2799,c_1034,c_1035,c_1036]) ).
tcf(c_2810,plain,
empty_set = iPr_def_14,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2809,c_1042]) ).
tcf(c_2873,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(iPr_def_11,X0) = iPr_def_14 )
| ( apply(sK11,apply(sK10,X0)) = apply(iPr_def_11,X0) ) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2724,c_2810]) ).
tcf(c_2880,plain,
( ( apply(iPr_def_11,sK9) = iPr_def_14 )
| ( apply(sK11,iPr_def_13) = apply(iPr_def_11,sK9) ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1035,c_2873]) ).
tcf(c_2884,plain,
iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_14,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2880,c_1034,c_1036]) ).
tcf(c_2885,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2884,c_1042]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU215+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:14:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42
% 0.10/0.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42
% 0.10/0.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43 % Proving...
% 2.76/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.76/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.76/1.19 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.76/1.19 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Parsing...
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 %
% 2.76/1.19 % clauses 58
% 2.76/1.19 % conjectures 6
% 2.76/1.19 % EPR 25
% 2.76/1.19 % Horn 55
% 2.76/1.19 % unary 30
% 2.76/1.19 % binary 10
% 2.76/1.19 % lits 123
% 2.76/1.19 % lits eq 12
% 2.76/1.19 % fd_pure 0
% 2.76/1.19 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.76/1.19 % fd_cond 1
% 2.76/1.19 % fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 2.76/1.19 % AC symbols 0
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------
% 2.76/1.19 % Current options:
% 2.76/1.19 % ------
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 %
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 2.76/1.19 %
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.76/1.19
% 2.76/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------