↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU216+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.97s 2.17s
% Output   : Refutation 1.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU216+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 07:00:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.97/2.17  
% 1.97/2.17  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.97/2.17  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.97/2.17  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.97/2.17  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.97/2.17  SPASS derived 5331 clauses, backtracked 251 clauses, performed 4 splits and kept 2095 clauses.
% 1.97/2.17  SPASS allocated 104210 KBytes.
% 1.97/2.17  SPASS spent	0:00:01.77 on the problem.
% 1.97/2.17  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 1.97/2.17  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.97/2.17  		0:00:00.09 for inferences.
% 1.97/2.17  		0:00:00.03 for the backtracking.
% 1.97/2.17  		0:00:01.54 for the reduction.
% 1.97/2.17  
% 1.97/2.17  
% 1.97/2.17  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 73 :
% 1.97/2.17  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.97/2.17  1[0:Inp] ||  -> function(skc9)*.
% 1.97/2.17  2[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(skc9)*.
% 1.97/2.17  18[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(identity_relation(u))*.
% 1.97/2.17  19[0:Inp] ||  -> function(identity_relation(u))*.
% 1.97/2.17  28[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(relation_dom(identity_relation(u)),u)**.
% 1.97/2.17  38[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)**.
% 1.97/2.17  45[0:Inp] || in(u,skc10) -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,u),u)**.
% 1.97/2.17  46[0:Inp] || equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  47[0:Inp] || equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  48[0:Inp] function(u) relation(u) || in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)* -> in(v,relation_dom(u)).
% 1.97/2.17  51[0:Inp] function(u) relation(u) || in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)* -> equal(w,apply(u,v)).
% 1.97/2.17  54[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) in(skf3(v,u),v) in(ordered_pair(skf3(v,u),skf4(v,u)),u)*.
% 1.97/2.17  55[0:Inp] relation(u) || equal(v,w) in(v,x)* equal(u,identity_relation(x))*+ -> in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)*.
% 1.97/2.17  56[0:Inp] function(u) relation(u) || in(v,relation_dom(u)) equal(w,apply(u,v)) -> in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)*.
% 1.97/2.17  59[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) equal(skf4(v,u),skf3(v,u)) in(ordered_pair(skf3(v,u),skf4(v,u)),u)*.
% 1.97/2.17  60[0:Inp] || in(skf3(u,v),u) equal(skf4(u,v),skf3(u,v)) in(ordered_pair(skf3(u,v),skf4(u,v)),v)* -> .
% 1.97/2.17  63[0:Res:2.0,56.0] function(skc9) || equal(u,apply(skc9,v)) in(v,relation_dom(skc9)) -> in(ordered_pair(v,u),skc9)*.
% 1.97/2.17  71[0:Res:2.0,48.0] function(skc9) || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)* -> in(u,relation_dom(skc9)).
% 1.97/2.17  79[0:MRR:71.0,1.0] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)* -> in(u,relation_dom(skc9)).
% 1.97/2.17  83[0:MRR:63.0,1.0] || in(u,relation_dom(skc9)) equal(v,apply(skc9,u)) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)*.
% 1.97/2.17  84[1:Spt:38.1] ||  -> equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)**.
% 1.97/2.17  85[1:Rew:84.0,47.0] || equal(skc10,skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  86[1:Rew:84.0,46.0] || equal(skc10,skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  90[1:Rew:84.0,83.0] || in(u,skc10) equal(v,apply(skc9,u)) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)*.
% 1.97/2.17  91[1:Rew:84.0,79.1] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)* -> in(u,skc10).
% 1.97/2.17  92[1:Obv:86.0] || equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  93[1:Obv:85.0] || equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  95[2:Spt:45.0,45.2] || in(u,skc10) -> equal(apply(skc9,u),u)**.
% 1.97/2.17  96[2:Rew:95.1,90.1] || in(u,skc10) equal(v,u) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)*.
% 1.97/2.17  187[3:Spt:93.0] || equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  287[0:EqR:55.3] relation(identity_relation(u)) || equal(v,w) in(v,u) -> in(ordered_pair(v,w),identity_relation(u))*.
% 1.97/2.17  289[0:SSi:287.0,19.0,18.0] || equal(u,v) in(u,w) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),identity_relation(w))*.
% 1.97/2.17  296[0:Res:289.2,51.2] function(identity_relation(u)) relation(identity_relation(u)) || equal(v,w) in(v,u) -> equal(w,apply(identity_relation(u),v))*.
% 1.97/2.17  305[0:SSi:296.1,296.0,19.0,18.0,19.0,18.0] || equal(u,v) in(u,w) -> equal(v,apply(identity_relation(w),u))*.
% 1.97/2.17  316[1:Res:54.3,91.0] relation(skc9) ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) in(skf3(u,skc9),u)* in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  320[1:SSi:316.0,1.0,2.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) in(skf3(u,skc9),u)* in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  593[0:Res:59.3,51.2] relation(u) function(u) relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) equal(skf4(v,u),skf3(v,u)) equal(apply(u,skf3(v,u)),skf4(v,u))**.
% 1.97/2.17  598[1:Res:59.3,91.0] relation(skc9) ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)) in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  603[1:SSi:598.0,1.0,2.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)) in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  611[0:Obv:593.0] function(u) relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) equal(skf4(v,u),skf3(v,u)) equal(apply(u,skf3(v,u)),skf4(v,u))**.
% 1.97/2.17  658[2:Res:96.2,60.2] || in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)* equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)) in(skf3(u,skc9),u)* equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)) -> .
% 1.97/2.17  663[2:Obv:658.1] || in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)* in(skf3(u,skc9),u)* equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9))+ -> .
% 1.97/2.17  1461[2:SpR:611.4,95.1] function(skc9) relation(skc9) || in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)) equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)).
% 1.97/2.17  1469[2:Obv:1461.4] function(skc9) relation(skc9) || in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)).
% 1.97/2.17  1470[2:SSi:1469.1,1469.0,1.0,2.0,1.0,2.0] || in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)).
% 1.97/2.17  1471[2:MRR:1470.0,603.2] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf4(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9))**.
% 1.97/2.17  1533[1:Fac:320.1,320.2] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) in(skf3(skc10,skc9),skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  1547[3:MRR:1533.0,187.0] ||  -> in(skf3(skc10,skc9),skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  2713[2:SpL:1471.1,663.2] || in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)* in(skf3(u,skc9),u)* equal(skf3(u,skc9),skf3(u,skc9)) -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9).
% 1.97/2.17  2716[2:Obv:2713.2] || in(skf3(u,skc9),skc10)*+ in(skf3(u,skc9),u)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9).
% 1.97/2.17  5314[3:Res:1547.0,2716.0] || in(skf3(skc10,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9).
% 1.97/2.17  5317[3:MRR:5314.0,5314.1,1547.0,187.0] ||  -> .
% 1.97/2.17  5325[3:Spt:5317.0,93.0,187.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)**.
% 1.97/2.17  5326[3:Spt:5317.0,93.1] || equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  5328[3:Rew:5325.0,92.0] || equal(skc9,skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  5329[3:Obv:5328.0] ||  -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  5401[3:SpL:95.1,5326.0] || in(skc11,skc10)* equal(skc11,skc11) -> .
% 1.97/2.17  5408[3:Obv:5401.1] || in(skc11,skc10)* -> .
% 1.97/2.17  5409[3:MRR:5408.0,5329.0] ||  -> .
% 1.97/2.17  5412[2:Spt:5409.0,45.1] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)**.
% 1.97/2.17  5416[2:Rew:5412.0,92.0] || equal(skc9,skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  5417[2:Obv:5416.0] ||  -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 1.97/2.17  5422[2:Rew:5412.0,93.0] || equal(skc9,skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  5423[2:Obv:5422.0] || equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  5473[2:SpR:5412.0,305.2] || equal(u,v) in(u,skc10) -> equal(v,apply(skc9,u))*.
% 1.97/2.17  7046[2:SpL:5473.2,5423.0] || equal(skc11,u)* in(skc11,skc10)* equal(u,skc11)* -> .
% 1.97/2.17  7047[2:Obv:7046.0] || in(skc11,skc10)* equal(u,skc11)* -> .
% 1.97/2.17  7048[2:AED:7047.1] || in(skc11,skc10)* -> .
% 1.97/2.17  7049[2:MRR:7048.0,5417.0] ||  -> .
% 1.97/2.17  7113[1:Spt:7049.0,38.1,84.0] || equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)** -> .
% 1.97/2.17  7114[1:Spt:7049.0,38.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)**.
% 1.97/2.17  7121[1:SpR:7114.0,28.0] ||  -> equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)**.
% 1.97/2.17  7193[1:MRR:7121.0,7113.0] ||  -> .
% 1.97/2.17  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.97/2.17  Formulae used in the proof : t34_funct_1 fc2_funct_1 t71_relat_1 t8_funct_1 d10_relat_1 antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 1.97/2.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------