%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU217+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:38:04 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.24s 2.57s
% Output : Refutation 4.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 31
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 64 ( 15 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 143 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 321 ( 26 ~; 2 |; 43 &; 216 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 32 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 14 ( 12 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 92 ( 0 ^; 74 !; 18 ?; 92 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(apply_decl,type,
apply: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(identity_relation_decl,type,
identity_relation: $i > $i ).
thf(subset_decl,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(relation_decl,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(empty_set_decl,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(element_decl,type,
element: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(relation_empty_yielding_decl,type,
relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).
thf(powerset_decl,type,
powerset: $i > $i ).
thf(relation_dom_decl,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
thf(function_decl,type,
function: $i > $o ).
thf(27,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
| ( B @ empty ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).
thf(115,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
| ( B @ empty ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(25,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(110,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_relat_1) ).
thf(46,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(30,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ identity_relation @ function )
& ( A @ identity_relation @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).
thf(133,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ identity_relation @ function )
& ( A @ identity_relation @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation_empty_yielding )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc3_relat_1) ).
thf(77,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation_empty_yielding )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
( ( empty_set @ relation )
& ( empty_set @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc4_relat_1) ).
thf(73,plain,
( ( empty_set @ relation )
& ( empty_set @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(44,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
& ~ ( A @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_relat_1) ).
thf(54,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
& ~ ( A @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(23,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_funct_1) ).
thf(103,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A @ function ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_funct_1) ).
thf(95,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A @ function ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(24,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ( C @ empty )
& ( C @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t5_subset) ).
thf(107,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ( C @ empty )
& ( C @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
( ( empty_set @ relation_empty_yielding )
& ( empty_set @ relation )
& ( empty_set @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc12_relat_1) ).
thf(62,plain,
( ( empty_set @ relation_empty_yielding )
& ( empty_set @ relation )
& ( empty_set @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(22,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ relation )
& ~ ( A @ empty ) )
=> ~ ( A @ relation_dom @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc5_relat_1) ).
thf(101,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ relation )
& ~ ( A @ empty ) )
=> ~ ( A @ relation_dom @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( ( A @ relation_dom @ relation )
& ( A @ relation_dom @ empty ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc7_relat_1) ).
thf(88,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( ( A @ relation_dom @ relation )
& ( A @ relation_dom @ empty ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ powerset @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_subset_1) ).
thf(85,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ powerset @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
thf(60,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(28,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(117,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ identity_relation @ apply ) )
= B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t35_funct_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ identity_relation @ apply ) )
= B ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(33,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ identity_relation @ apply ) )
= B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(92,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_subset_1) ).
thf(97,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
empty_set @ empty,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(53,plain,
empty_set @ empty,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(32,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ identity_relation @ relation ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
thf(141,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ identity_relation @ relation ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
thf(26,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).
thf(113,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ? [B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_subset_1) ).
thf(81,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ? [B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ empty )
& ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(50,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
<=> ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).
thf(67,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
=> ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) ) )
& ( ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(31,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_subset) ).
thf(139,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
thf(29,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ function )
& ( B @ relation ) )
=> ( ( B
= ( A @ identity_relation ) )
<=> ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ apply ) )
= C ) )
& ( ( B @ relation_dom )
= A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).
thf(119,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ function )
& ( B @ relation ) )
=> ( ( ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ apply ) )
= C ) )
& ( ( B @ relation_dom )
= A ) )
=> ( B
= ( A @ identity_relation ) ) )
& ( ( B
= ( A @ identity_relation ) )
=> ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( B @ apply ) )
= C ) )
& ( ( B @ relation_dom )
= A ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_relat_1) ).
thf(58,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(143,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[115,110,46,133,77,73,44,54,103,95,107,62,101,88,85,60,117,38,33,92,97,53,141,113,81,50,67,40,139,119,58]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU217+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:52:29 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.40 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.85/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.20/1.18 % [INFO] Parsing done (186ms).
% 1.20/1.20 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.86/1.58 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.86/1.59 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.08/1.69 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 30 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.22/1.76 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 30 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.44/1.80 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.44/1.81 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.44/1.81 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.24/2.56 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.24/2.56 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.24/2.57 % Time passed: 2017ms (effective reasoning time: 1361ms)
% 4.24/2.57 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.24/2.57 % Axioms used in derivation (30): cc1_relat_1, rc1_funct_1, t5_subset, fc2_funct_1, t4_subset, rc1_subset_1, fc5_relat_1, rc2_relat_1, dt_k6_relat_1, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc1_xboole_0, fc4_relat_1, t1_subset, t34_funct_1, rc3_relat_1, t6_boole, rc2_subset_1, t7_boole, cc1_funct_1, fc1_subset_1, t3_subset, existence_m1_subset_1, rc1_relat_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0, t2_subset, fc7_relat_1, fc12_relat_1
% 4.24/2.57 % No. of inferences in proof: 64
% 4.24/2.57 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2017 ms resp. 1361 ms w/o parsing
% 4.52/2.65 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.52/2.65 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------