%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU217+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PFneDHMfPV true
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:53:52 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 1.44s 1.15s
% Output : Refutation 1.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 12 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 86 ( 13 ~; 9 |; 3 &; 56 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 ^; 18 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_dom_type,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
thf(relation_type,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(apply_type,type,
apply: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(identity_relation_type,type,
identity_relation: $i > $i ).
thf(sk__9_type,type,
sk__9: $i ).
thf(sk__10_type,type,
sk__10: $i ).
thf(function_type,type,
function: $i > $o ).
thf(t34_funct_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ( ( B
= ( identity_relation @ A ) )
<=> ( ( ( relation_dom @ B )
= A )
& ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( ( apply @ B @ C )
= C ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl45,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1
!= ( identity_relation @ X0 ) )
| ( ( apply @ X1 @ X2 )
= X2 )
| ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
| ~ ( function @ X1 )
| ~ ( relation @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t34_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl394,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( function @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
| ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) @ X1 )
= X1 ) ),
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl45]) ).
thf(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ A ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl22,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
thf(fc2_funct_1,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( function @ ( identity_relation @ A ) )
& ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ A ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl24,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( function @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fc2_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl395,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
| ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) @ X1 )
= X1 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl394,zip_derived_cl22,zip_derived_cl24]) ).
thf(t35_funct_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ A )
=> ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ A ) @ B )
= B ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ A )
=> ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ A ) @ B )
= B ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t35_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl42,plain,
( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ sk__9 ) @ sk__10 )
!= sk__10 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl396,plain,
( ~ ( in @ sk__10 @ sk__9 )
| ( sk__10 != sk__10 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl395,zip_derived_cl42]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl41,plain,
in @ sk__10 @ sk__9,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl399,plain,
sk__10 != sk__10,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl396,zip_derived_cl41]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl400,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl399]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.25 % Problem : SEU217+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.25 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PFneDHMfPV true
% 0.08/0.47 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.47 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.47 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.47 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:05:08 EDT 2025
% 0.08/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.47 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.08/0.47 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.47 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.08/0.47 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.08/0.47 % Running in FO mode
% 0.30/0.83 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.30/0.83 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.30/0.83 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.30/0.93 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.30/1.04 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.30/1.04 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.40/1.08 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.40/1.10 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.40/1.10 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.40/1.11 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.44/1.15 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.44/1.15 % BCE start: 47
% 1.44/1.15 % BCE eliminated: 2
% 1.44/1.15 % PE start: 45
% 1.44/1.15 logic: eq
% 1.44/1.15 % PE eliminated: 2
% 1.44/1.15 % done 72 iterations in 0.079s
% 1.44/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.44/1.15 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.44/1.15
% 1.44/1.15
% 1.44/1.15 % Terminating...
% 1.70/1.33 % Runner terminated.
% 1.73/1.37 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------