↑ Up

Otter---3.3.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU219+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:15:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.00s 2.19s
% Output   : Refutation 2.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  20 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ one_to_one(A)
    | function_inverse(A) = relation_inverse(A) ),
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,plain,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ one_to_one(A)
    | relation_inverse(A) = function_inverse(A) ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[1])]),
    [iquote('copy,1,flip.4')] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | relation_rng(A) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(A)) ),
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | relation_dom(A) = relation_rng(relation_inverse(A)) ),
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | relation_rng(relation_inverse(A)) = relation_dom(A) ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[9])]),
    [iquote('copy,9,flip.2')] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( relation_rng(dollar_c3) != relation_dom(function_inverse(dollar_c3))
    | relation_dom(dollar_c3) != relation_rng(function_inverse(dollar_c3)) ),
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    ( relation_rng(dollar_c3) != relation_dom(function_inverse(dollar_c3))
    | relation_rng(function_inverse(dollar_c3)) != relation_dom(dollar_c3) ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[11])]),
    [iquote('copy,11,flip.2')] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    relation(dollar_c3),
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    function(dollar_c3),
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    one_to_one(dollar_c3),
    file('SEU219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,plain,
    relation_rng(relation_inverse(dollar_c3)) = relation_dom(dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,10')] ).

cnf(52,plain,
    relation_rng(dollar_c3) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(dollar_c3)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,8')] ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ( relation_dom(relation_inverse(dollar_c3)) != relation_dom(function_inverse(dollar_c3))
    | relation_rng(function_inverse(dollar_c3)) != relation_dom(dollar_c3) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[12]),52]),
    [iquote('back_demod,12,demod,52')] ).

cnf(61,plain,
    relation_inverse(dollar_c3) = function_inverse(dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[21,2,19,20]),
    [iquote('hyper,21,2,19,20')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( relation_dom(function_inverse(dollar_c3)) != relation_dom(function_inverse(dollar_c3))
    | relation_rng(function_inverse(dollar_c3)) != relation_dom(dollar_c3) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[56]),61]),
    [iquote('back_demod,56,demod,61')] ).

cnf(68,plain,
    relation_rng(function_inverse(dollar_c3)) = relation_dom(dollar_c3),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[49]),61]),
    [iquote('back_demod,49,demod,61')] ).

cnf(69,plain,
    ( relation_dom(function_inverse(dollar_c3)) != relation_dom(function_inverse(dollar_c3))
    | relation_dom(dollar_c3) != relation_dom(dollar_c3) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[62]),68]),
    [iquote('back_demod,62,demod,68')] ).

cnf(143,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[69,13,13]),
    [iquote('hyper,69,13,13')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU219+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:49:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.00/2.18  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.00/2.18  The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 2.00/2.18  Wed Jul 27 07:49:08 2022
% 2.00/2.18  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 6831.
% 2.00/2.18  
% 2.00/2.18  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.00/2.18  set(auto).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.00/2.18  clear(print_given).
% 2.00/2.18  
% 2.00/2.18  formula_list(usable).
% 2.00/2.18  all A (A=A).
% 2.00/2.18  all A (relation(A)&function(A)-> (one_to_one(A)->function_inverse(A)=relation_inverse(A))).
% 2.00/2.18  $T.
% 2.00/2.18  all A (relation(A)&function(A)->relation(function_inverse(A))&function(function_inverse(A))).
% 2.00/2.18  $T.
% 2.00/2.18  all A (relation(A)->relation(relation_inverse(A))).
% 2.00/2.18  all A (relation(A)&function(A)&one_to_one(A)->relation(relation_inverse(A))&function(relation_inverse(A))).
% 2.00/2.18  all A (relation(A)->relation_inverse(relation_inverse(A))=A).
% 2.00/2.18  exists A (relation(A)&function(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  exists A (relation(A)&function(A)&one_to_one(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  all A (relation(A)->relation_rng(A)=relation_dom(relation_inverse(A))&relation_dom(A)=relation_rng(relation_inverse(A))).
% 2.00/2.18  -(all A (relation(A)&function(A)-> (one_to_one(A)->relation_rng(A)=relation_dom(function_inverse(A))&relation_dom(A)=relation_rng(function_inverse(A))))).
% 2.00/2.18  end_of_list.
% 2.00/2.18  
% 2.00/2.18  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 2.00/2.18  
% 2.00/2.18  list(usable).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] A=A.
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|function_inverse(A)=relation_inverse(A).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] $T.
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(function_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|function(function_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] $T.
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|function(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)|relation_inverse(relation_inverse(A))=A.
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] relation($c1).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] function($c1).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] relation($c2).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] function($c2).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] one_to_one($c2).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)|relation_rng(A)=relation_dom(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] -relation(A)|relation_dom(A)=relation_rng(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] relation($c3).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] function($c3).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] one_to_one($c3).
% 2.00/2.18  0 [] relation_rng($c3)!=relation_dom(function_inverse($c3))|relation_dom($c3)!=relation_rng(function_inverse($c3)).
% 2.00/2.18  end_of_list.
% 2.00/2.18  
% 2.00/2.18  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 2.00/2.18  
% 2.00/2.18  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 2.00/2.18  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 2.00/2.18  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 2.00/2.18  
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.00/2.18     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ------------> process usable:
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 2 [copy,1,flip.4] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation_inverse(A)=function_inverse(A).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(function_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 4 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|function(function_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 5 [] -relation(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.19    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|function(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 7 [] -relation(A)|relation_inverse(relation_inverse(A))=A.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] -relation(A)|relation_rng(A)=relation_dom(relation_inverse(A)).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 10 [copy,9,flip.2] -relation(A)|relation_rng(relation_inverse(A))=relation_dom(A).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 12 [copy,11,flip.2] relation_rng($c3)!=relation_dom(function_inverse($c3))|relation_rng(function_inverse($c3))!=relation_dom($c3).
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ------------> process sos:
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 13 [] A=A.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] relation($c1).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 15 [] function($c1).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 16 [] relation($c2).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 17 [] function($c2).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 18 [] one_to_one($c2).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 19 [] relation($c3).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 20 [] function($c3).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 21 [] one_to_one($c3).
% 2.00/2.19    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] A=A.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 143 [hyper,69,13,13] $F.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 4.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.00/2.19  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.00/2.19  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.00/2.19  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ============ end of search ============
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.00/2.19  clauses given                 46
% 2.00/2.19  clauses generated            177
% 2.00/2.19  clauses kept                 101
% 2.00/2.19  clauses forward subsumed     109
% 2.00/2.19  clauses back subsumed          0
% 2.00/2.19  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.00/2.19  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.19  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.19  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  Process 6831 finished Wed Jul 27 07:49:10 2022
% 2.00/2.19  Otter interrupted
% 2.00/2.19  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------