↑ Up

lazyCoP---0.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SEU219+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:54:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.40s 0.64s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SEU219+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 17:22:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.40/0.64  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.40/0.64  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation(sK2)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c1, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation(sK2),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 2.40/0.64  	function_inverse(X0) = relation_inverse(X0) | ~one_to_one(X0) | ~function(X0) | ~relation(X0)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	sK2 = X0).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c3, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c4, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	function_inverse(X0) = relation_inverse(X0) | ~one_to_one(X0) | ~function(X0),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c5, axiom,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1)) | ~relation(X1)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_inverse(X1) = relation_inverse(X0)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	function_inverse(X0) = X2).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c6, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	~one_to_one(X0) | ~function(X0),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c7, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	~relation(X1),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c8, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(X2),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c9, axiom,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_dom(sK2) != relation_rng(function_inverse(sK2)) | relation_rng(sK2) != relation_dom(function_inverse(sK2))).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_rng(function_inverse(sK2)) = relation_rng(X2)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_dom(X1) = X3).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c10, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4])], [c8, c9])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c11, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_rng(sK2) != relation_dom(function_inverse(sK2)),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4])], [c8, c9])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c12, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_dom(sK2) != X3,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4])], [c8, c9])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_dom(sK2) = X3).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c13, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c12])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c14, axiom,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_rng(X4) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(X4)) | ~relation(X4)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_rng(sK2) = relation_rng(X4)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c15, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c11, c14])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c16, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	~relation(X4),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c11, c14])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c17, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	X5 != relation_dom(relation_inverse(X4)) | X5 != relation_dom(function_inverse(sK2)),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c11, c14])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c18, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	function_inverse(X0) = relation_inverse(X0)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation_inverse(X4) = relation_inverse(X0)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	function_inverse(X0) = X6).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c19, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	X5 != relation_dom(function_inverse(sK2)),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(equality_reduction, [assumptions([a7, a8])], [c17, c18])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c20, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	X5 != relation_dom(X6),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(equality_reduction, [assumptions([a7, a8])], [c17, c18])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	X5 = relation_dom(X6)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c21, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c20])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	X5 = relation_dom(function_inverse(sK2))).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c22, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a10])], [c19])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c23, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation(sK2)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	X4 = sK2).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c24, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a11])], [c16, c23])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c25, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	relation(sK2)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	X1 = sK2).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c26, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a12])], [c7, c25])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c27, axiom,
% 2.40/0.64  	one_to_one(sK2)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a13, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	X0 = sK2).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c28, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	~function(X0),
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13])], [c6, c27])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c29, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13])], [c6, c27])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c30, axiom,
% 2.40/0.64  	function(sK2)).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(a14, assumption,
% 2.40/0.64  	X0 = sK2).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c31, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a14])], [c28, c30])).
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c32, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a14])], [c28, c30])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  cnf(c33, plain,
% 2.40/0.64  	$false,
% 2.40/0.64  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 2.40/0.64  		bind(X0, sK2),
% 2.40/0.64  		bind(X1, sK2),
% 2.40/0.64  		bind(X2, function_inverse(X0)),
% 2.40/0.64  		bind(X3, relation_dom(X1)),
% 2.40/0.64  		bind(X4, sK2),
% 2.40/0.64  		bind(X5, relation_dom(X6)),
% 2.40/0.64  		bind(X6, function_inverse(X0))
% 2.40/0.64  	],
% 2.40/0.64  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14])).
% 2.40/0.64  
% 2.40/0.64  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------