↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU220+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:20:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (  10 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | relation(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | function(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(38,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,relation_dom(X))
    | apply(relation_composition(X,Y),Z) = apply(Y,apply(X,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).

cnf(42,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | Y != function_inverse(X)
    | ~ in(Z,relation_rng(X))
    | U != apply(Y,Z)
    | Z = apply(X,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_funct_1) ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | relation_rng(X) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).

cnf(52,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_funct_1) ).

cnf(53,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_funct_1) ).

cnf(54,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_funct_1) ).

cnf(55,negated_conjecture,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV12',relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_funct_1) ).

cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV12' != apply('SKOLEMAAAV13',apply(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12'))
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV12' != apply(relation_composition(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_funct_1) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    relation(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,52,53]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    function(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,52,53]) ).

cnf(142,plain,
    relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV13') = relation_dom(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[50,52,53,54]) ).

cnf(143,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV12',relation_dom(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[55,142,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(229,plain,
    apply(relation_composition(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12') = apply('SKOLEMAAAV13',apply(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[38,78,75,52,53,143]) ).

cnf(230,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV12' != apply('SKOLEMAAAV13',apply(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[56,229,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(235,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[42,230,52,53,54,75,78,theory(equality),theory(equality)]),143,142,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SEU220+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 01:34:38 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  "."
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T01:34:38
% 0.21/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n005.cluster.edu at 2022-06-20T01:34:38
% 0.21/0.51  WARNING:
% 0.21/0.51     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.42/0.60  
% 0.42/0.60  
% 0.42/0.60  #||
% 0.42/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.60  ||#
% 0.42/0.60  
% 0.42/0.60  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.42/0.60  ;       555 formulas have been input or derived (from 73 formulas).
% 0.42/0.60  ;       235 (42%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.42/0.60  ;           20 ( 9%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.42/0.60  ;          215 (91%) are still being kept.
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.007   7%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.003   3%   Assert                       (39 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.015  14%   Process new row              (530 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.046  43%   Resolution                   (144 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Paramodulation               (72 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (39 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.002   2%   Forward subsumption          (39 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Backward subsumption         (38 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (12 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.003   3%   Forward simplification       (465 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.003   3%   Backward simplification      (235 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (47 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.025  23%   Other
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.107        Total
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.111        Real time
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; Term-hash-array has 370 terms in all.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 37 entries (38 at peak, 38 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 146 nodes (162 at peak, 162 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ;  Retrieved 9 possibly forward subsuming rows in 39 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 38 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Path-index has 361 entries (361 at peak, 383 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Path-index has 375 nodes (375 at peak, 399 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Trie-index has 361 entries (361 at peak, 383 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Trie-index has 611 nodes (611 at peak, 652 added, 41 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 225 generalization terms in 542 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 196 instance terms in 196 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 48,586 unifiable terms in 8,483 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to give has 151 entries:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     4 with value (4 6)           4 with value (4 9)            1 with value (4 12)
% 0.42/0.60  ;    60 with value (4 7)          55 with value (4 10)           4 with value (4 19)
% 0.42/0.60  ;    11 with value (4 8)          11 with value (4 11)           1 with value (4 21)
% 0.42/0.60  Evaluation took:
% 0.42/0.60    0.112 seconds of real time
% 0.42/0.60    0.102023 seconds of user run time
% 0.42/0.60    0.008124 seconds of system run time
% 0.42/0.60    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.42/0.60    0 page faults and
% 0.42/0.60    6,306,136 bytes consed.
% 0.42/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.60  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T01:34:38
% 0.42/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.60  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------