%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU220+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.09s 1.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 245 ( 69 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 130 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 376 ( 158 ~; 163 |; 39 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 31 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 0 sgn 24 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t57_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
& one_to_one(X2) )
=> ( X1 = apply(relation_composition(function_inverse(X2),X2),X1)
& X1 = apply(X2,apply(function_inverse(X2),X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_funct_1) ).
fof(t23_funct_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( function(X3)
& relation(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
=> apply(relation_composition(X2,X3),X1) = apply(X3,apply(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).
fof(t54_funct_1,lemma,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( X2 = function_inverse(X1)
<=> ( ! [X3,X4] :
( ( ( X3 = apply(X1,X4)
& in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) )
=> ( X4 = apply(X2,X3)
& in(X3,relation_rng(X1)) ) )
& ( ( X4 = apply(X2,X3)
& in(X3,relation_rng(X1)) )
=> ( X3 = apply(X1,X4)
& in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) )
& relation_dom(X2) = relation_rng(X1) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k2_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( function(function_inverse(X1))
& relation(function_inverse(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).
fof(t55_funct_1,lemma,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X1))
& relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
& one_to_one(X2) )
=> ( X1 = apply(relation_composition(function_inverse(X2),X2),X1)
& X1 = apply(X2,apply(function_inverse(X2),X1)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t57_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ( esk77_0 != apply(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk78_0),esk78_0),esk77_0)
| esk77_0 != apply(esk78_0,apply(function_inverse(esk78_0),esk77_0)) )
& in(esk77_0,relation_rng(esk78_0))
& one_to_one(esk78_0)
& function(esk78_0)
& relation(esk78_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,lemma,
! [X449,X450,X451] :
( apply(relation_composition(X450,X451),X449) = apply(X451,apply(X450,X449))
| ~ in(X449,relation_dom(X450))
| ~ function(X451)
| ~ relation(X451)
| ~ function(X450)
| ~ relation(X450) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_funct_1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,lemma,
! [X544,X545,X546,X547,X548,X549] :
( ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| esk71_2(X544,X545) != apply(X544,esk72_2(X544,X545))
| ~ in(esk72_2(X544,X545),relation_dom(X544))
| esk74_2(X544,X545) != apply(X545,esk73_2(X544,X545))
| ~ in(esk73_2(X544,X545),relation_rng(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| esk71_2(X544,X545) != apply(X544,esk72_2(X544,X545))
| ~ in(esk72_2(X544,X545),relation_dom(X544))
| esk73_2(X544,X545) = apply(X544,esk74_2(X544,X545)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| esk71_2(X544,X545) != apply(X544,esk72_2(X544,X545))
| ~ in(esk72_2(X544,X545),relation_dom(X544))
| in(esk74_2(X544,X545),relation_dom(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| esk72_2(X544,X545) = apply(X545,esk71_2(X544,X545))
| esk74_2(X544,X545) != apply(X545,esk73_2(X544,X545))
| ~ in(esk73_2(X544,X545),relation_rng(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| esk72_2(X544,X545) = apply(X545,esk71_2(X544,X545))
| esk73_2(X544,X545) = apply(X544,esk74_2(X544,X545)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| esk72_2(X544,X545) = apply(X545,esk71_2(X544,X545))
| in(esk74_2(X544,X545),relation_dom(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| in(esk71_2(X544,X545),relation_rng(X544))
| esk74_2(X544,X545) != apply(X545,esk73_2(X544,X545))
| ~ in(esk73_2(X544,X545),relation_rng(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| in(esk71_2(X544,X545),relation_rng(X544))
| esk73_2(X544,X545) = apply(X544,esk74_2(X544,X545)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 = function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) != relation_rng(X544)
| in(esk71_2(X544,X545),relation_rng(X544))
| in(esk74_2(X544,X545),relation_dom(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 != function_inverse(X544)
| X548 != apply(X544,X549)
| ~ in(X549,relation_dom(X544))
| X549 = apply(X545,X548) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 != function_inverse(X544)
| X548 != apply(X544,X549)
| ~ in(X549,relation_dom(X544))
| in(X548,relation_rng(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 != function_inverse(X544)
| X547 != apply(X545,X546)
| ~ in(X546,relation_rng(X544))
| X546 = apply(X544,X547) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 != function_inverse(X544)
| X547 != apply(X545,X546)
| ~ in(X546,relation_rng(X544))
| in(X547,relation_dom(X544)) )
& ( ~ function(X544)
| ~ relation(X544)
| ~ one_to_one(X544)
| ~ function(X545)
| ~ relation(X545)
| X545 != function_inverse(X544)
| relation_dom(X545) = relation_rng(X544) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t54_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X257] :
( ( ~ function(X257)
| ~ relation(X257)
| function(function_inverse(X257)) )
& ( ~ function(X257)
| ~ relation(X257)
| relation(function_inverse(X257)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_funct_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( esk77_0 != apply(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk78_0),esk78_0),esk77_0)
| esk77_0 != apply(esk78_0,apply(function_inverse(esk78_0),esk77_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,lemma,
( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk78_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
function(esk78_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,lemma,
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ function(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| X4 != function_inverse(X2)
| X3 != apply(X4,X1)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
| X1 = apply(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| function(function_inverse(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation(function_inverse(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk77_0,relation_dom(function_inverse(esk78_0)))
| ~ function(function_inverse(esk78_0))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk78_0))
| apply(esk78_0,apply(function_inverse(esk78_0),esk77_0)) != esk77_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,lemma,
( ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| apply(X1,apply(function_inverse(X1),X2)) = X2 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(esk78_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
in(esk77_0,relation_rng(esk78_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,lemma,
( ~ in(esk77_0,relation_dom(function_inverse(esk78_0)))
| ~ function(function_inverse(esk78_0))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk78_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_20])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,lemma,
! [X557] :
( ( ~ function(X557)
| ~ relation(X557)
| ~ one_to_one(X557)
| relation_dom(X557) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X557)) )
& ( ~ function(X557)
| ~ relation(X557)
| ~ one_to_one(X557)
| relation_rng(X557) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X557)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t55_funct_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
( ~ in(esk77_0,relation_dom(function_inverse(esk78_0)))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk78_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_15]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
~ relation(function_inverse(esk78_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_20]),c_0_19]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,lemma,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SEU220+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:04:07 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.09/1.09 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.09/1.09 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.09/1.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1715676 completed with status 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 1.09/1.09 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.09/1.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.09/1.09 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.09/1.09 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.09/1.09 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 1715687 completed with status 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 1.09/1.09 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.09/1.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.09/1.09 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.09/1.09 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.09/1.09 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 1.09/1.09 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 1.09/1.09 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.09/1.09
% 1.09/1.09 % Proof found!
% 1.09/1.09 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.09/1.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.09/1.09 % Parsed axioms : 232
% 1.09/1.09 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Initial clauses : 442
% 1.09/1.09 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 26
% 1.09/1.09 % Initial clauses in saturation : 416
% 1.09/1.09 % Processed clauses : 883
% 1.09/1.09 % ...of these trivial : 9
% 1.09/1.09 % ...subsumed : 43
% 1.09/1.09 % ...remaining for further processing : 831
% 1.09/1.09 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 132
% 1.09/1.09 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 1.09/1.09 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 1.09/1.09 % Generated clauses : 5522
% 1.09/1.09 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5236
% 1.09/1.09 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 26
% 1.09/1.09 % Paramodulations : 5382
% 1.09/1.09 % Factorizations : 14
% 1.09/1.09 % NegExts : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Equation resolutions : 137
% 1.09/1.09 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Total rewrite steps : 682
% 1.09/1.09 % ...of those cached : 563
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.09 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.09 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.09 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.09 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.09/1.09 % Current number of processed clauses : 375
% 1.09/1.09 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 48
% 1.09/1.09 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 1.09/1.09 % Negative unit clauses : 14
% 1.09/1.09 % Non-unit-clauses : 310
% 1.09/1.09 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5132
% 1.09/1.09 % ...number of literals in the above : 22787
% 1.09/1.09 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Current number of archived clauses : 385
% 1.09/1.09 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 75006
% 1.09/1.09 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28111
% 1.09/1.09 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 57
% 1.09/1.09 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 864
% 1.09/1.09 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % BW rewrite match attempts : 78
% 1.09/1.09 % BW rewrite match successes : 56
% 1.09/1.09 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.09/1.09 % Termbank termtop insertions : 130793
% 1.09/1.09 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7457
% 1.09/1.09
% 1.09/1.09 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.09/1.09 % User time : 0.369 s
% 1.09/1.09 % System time : 0.017 s
% 1.09/1.09 % Total time : 0.386 s
% 1.09/1.09 % Maximum resident set size: 5148 pages
% 1.09/1.09
% 1.09/1.09 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.09/1.09 % User time : 1.934 s
% 1.09/1.09 % System time : 0.105 s
% 1.09/1.09 % Total time : 2.038 s
% 1.09/1.09 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 1.09/1.09 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------