↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SEU223+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:58:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 96.79s 97.10s
% Output   : Proof 96.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  32 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  156 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  160 (  62   ~;  54   |;  34   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   6 sgn  44   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fc4_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( function(relation_dom_restriction(A,B))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',fc4_funct_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t68_funct_1,lemma,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( function(B)
        & relation(B) )
     => ! [C] :
          ( ( function(C)
            & relation(C) )
         => ( B = relation_dom_restriction(C,A)
          <=> ( ! [D] :
                  ( in(D,relation_dom(B))
                 => apply(B,D) = apply(C,D) )
              & relation_dom(B) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(C),A) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t68_funct_1) ).

fof(t6_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(singleton(A),singleton(B))
     => A = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t6_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t70_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( function(C)
        & relation(C) )
     => ( in(B,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(C,A)))
       => apply(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) = apply(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t70_funct_1) ).

fof(f_91_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( function(relation_dom_restriction(A,B))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)) )
      | ~ function(A)
      | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc4_funct_1]) ).

fof(f_91_2,plain,
    ! [U_444,U_443] :
      ( ( function(relation_dom_restriction(U_444,U_443))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(U_444,U_443)) )
      | ~ function(U_444)
      | ~ relation(U_444) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_91_1]) ).

fof(f_91_3,plain,
    ! [U_444] :
      ( ( ! [U_446] : function(relation_dom_restriction(U_444,U_446))
        & ! [U_445] : relation(relation_dom_restriction(U_444,U_445)) )
      | ~ function(U_444)
      | ~ relation(U_444) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_91_2]) ).

cnf(f_91_4,plain,
    ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(U_444,U_445))
    | ~ function(U_444)
    | ~ relation(U_444) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_91_3]) ).

cnf(f_91_5,plain,
    ( function(relation_dom_restriction(U_444,U_446))
    | ~ function(U_444)
    | ~ relation(U_444) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_91_3]) ).

fof(f_130_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,A),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski]) ).

fof(f_130_2,plain,
    ! [U_534,U_533] : subset(U_534,U_534),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_130_1]) ).

fof(f_130_3,plain,
    ! [U_534] : subset(U_534,U_534),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_130_2]) ).

cnf(f_130_4,plain,
    subset(U_534,U_534),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_130_3]) ).

fof(f_216_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ! [C] :
          ( ( ( B = relation_dom_restriction(C,A)
              | ? [D] :
                  ( apply(B,D) != apply(C,D)
                  & in(D,relation_dom(B)) )
              | relation_dom(B) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(C),A) )
            & ( ( ! [D] :
                    ( apply(B,D) = apply(C,D)
                    | ~ in(D,relation_dom(B)) )
                & relation_dom(B) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(C),A) )
              | B != relation_dom_restriction(C,A) ) )
          | ~ function(C)
          | ~ relation(C) )
      | ~ function(B)
      | ~ relation(B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t68_funct_1]) ).

fof(f_216_2,plain,
    ! [U_796,U_795] :
      ( ! [U_794] :
          ( ( ( U_795 = relation_dom_restriction(U_794,U_796)
              | ? [U_793] :
                  ( apply(U_795,U_793) != apply(U_794,U_793)
                  & in(U_793,relation_dom(U_795)) )
              | relation_dom(U_795) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(U_794),U_796) )
            & ( ( ! [U_792] :
                    ( apply(U_795,U_792) = apply(U_794,U_792)
                    | ~ in(U_792,relation_dom(U_795)) )
                & relation_dom(U_795) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(U_794),U_796) )
              | U_795 != relation_dom_restriction(U_794,U_796) ) )
          | ~ function(U_794)
          | ~ relation(U_794) )
      | ~ function(U_795)
      | ~ relation(U_795) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_216_1]) ).

fof(f_216_3,plain,
    ! [U_796,U_795] :
      ( ! [U_794] :
          ( ( ( U_795 = relation_dom_restriction(U_794,U_796)
              | ( apply(U_795,sK105(U_796,U_795,U_794)) != apply(U_794,sK105(U_796,U_795,U_794))
                & in(sK105(U_796,U_795,U_794),relation_dom(U_795)) )
              | relation_dom(U_795) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(U_794),U_796) )
            & ( ( ! [U_792] :
                    ( apply(U_795,U_792) = apply(U_794,U_792)
                    | ~ in(U_792,relation_dom(U_795)) )
                & relation_dom(U_795) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(U_794),U_796) )
              | U_795 != relation_dom_restriction(U_794,U_796) ) )
          | ~ function(U_794)
          | ~ relation(U_794) )
      | ~ function(U_795)
      | ~ relation(U_795) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK105]),skolemize(U_793,sK105(U_796,U_795,U_794))],[f_216_2]) ).

cnf(f_216_5,plain,
    ( apply(U_795,U_792) = apply(U_794,U_792)
    | ~ in(U_792,relation_dom(U_795))
    | U_795 != relation_dom_restriction(U_794,U_796)
    | ~ function(U_794)
    | ~ relation(U_794)
    | ~ function(U_795)
    | ~ relation(U_795) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_216_3]) ).

fof(f_219_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( A = B
      | ~ subset(singleton(A),singleton(B)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_219_2,plain,
    ! [U_800,U_799] :
      ( U_800 = U_799
      | ~ subset(singleton(U_800),singleton(U_799)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_219_1]) ).

cnf(f_219_3,plain,
    ( U_800 = U_799
    | ~ subset(singleton(U_800),singleton(U_799)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_219_2]) ).

fof(f_220_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( function(C)
          & relation(C) )
       => ( in(B,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(C,A)))
         => apply(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) = apply(C,B) ) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[t70_funct_1]) ).

fof(f_220_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) != apply(C,B)
      & in(B,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(C,A)))
      & function(C)
      & relation(C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_220_1]) ).

fof(f_220_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_803,U_802,U_801] :
      ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(U_801,U_803),U_802) != apply(U_801,U_802)
      & in(U_802,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(U_801,U_803)))
      & function(U_801)
      & relation(U_801) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_220_2]) ).

fof(f_220_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_802,U_801] :
      ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(U_801,sK106),U_802) != apply(U_801,U_802)
      & in(U_802,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(U_801,sK106)))
      & function(U_801)
      & relation(U_801) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK106]),skolemize(U_803,sK106)],[f_220_3]) ).

fof(f_220_5,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_801] :
      ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(U_801,sK106),sK107) != apply(U_801,sK107)
      & in(sK107,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(U_801,sK106)))
      & function(U_801)
      & relation(U_801) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK107]),skolemize(U_802,sK107)],[f_220_4]) ).

fof(f_220_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106),sK107) != apply(sK108,sK107)
    & in(sK107,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)))
    & function(sK108)
    & relation(sK108) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK108]),skolemize(U_801,sK108)],[f_220_5]) ).

cnf(f_220_7,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK108),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_220_6]) ).

cnf(f_220_8,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK108),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_220_6]) ).

cnf(f_220_9,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK107,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_220_6]) ).

cnf(f_220_10,negated_conjecture,
    apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106),sK107) != apply(sK108,sK107),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_220_6]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106),sK107) != apply(sK108,sK107),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_220_10]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106))
    | ~ relation(sK108)
    | ~ function(sK108)
    | relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106) != relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)
    | ~ in(sK107,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)))
    | ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106))
    | apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106),sK107) = apply(sK108,sK107) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_216_5]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ function(sK108)
    | ~ relation(sK108)
    | relation(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_91_4]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    relation(sK108),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[f_220_7]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    function(sK108),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[f_220_8]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    in(sK107,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[f_220_9]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)),singleton(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)))
    | relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106) = relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:4)],[f_219_3]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t2:4]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    subset(singleton(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)),singleton(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:2)],[f_130_4]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t12:2]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    function(sK108),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:5)],[f_220_8]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t2:5]) ).

cnf(l8,lemma,
    function(sK108),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t2:5),below(t1:1)],[t2:5]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    relation(sK108),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:6)],[f_220_7]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t18:1)],[t18:1,t2:6]) ).

cnf(l9,lemma,
    relation(sK108),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t2:6),below(t1:1)],[t2:6]) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    ( ~ function(sK108)
    | ~ relation(sK108)
    | function(relation_dom_restriction(sK108,sK106)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:7)],[f_91_5]) ).

cnf(t21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t20:1)],[t20:1,t2:7]) ).

cnf(t22,plain,
    relation(sK108),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t20:2)],[l9:1]) ).

cnf(t23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t22:1)],[t22:1,t20:2]) ).

cnf(t24,plain,
    function(sK108),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t20:3)],[l8:1]) ).

cnf(t25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t24:1)],[t24:1,t20:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU223+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 23:34:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 96.79/97.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 96.79/97.10  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------