%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU223+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zdenAIzlnw true
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:53:54 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 1.99s 1.09s
% Output : Refutation 1.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 6 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 13 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 222 ( 28 ~; 24 |; 7 &; 153 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 12 ( 10 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 ^; 31 !; 0 ?; 31 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_dom_restriction_type,type,
relation_dom_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(set_intersection2_type,type,
set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(relation_type,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(sk__11_type,type,
sk__11: $i ).
thf(apply_type,type,
apply: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(function_type,type,
function: $i > $o ).
thf(sk__13_type,type,
sk__13: $i ).
thf(relation_dom_type,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
thf(sk__12_type,type,
sk__12: $i ).
thf(t68_funct_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( B
= ( relation_dom_restriction @ C @ A ) )
<=> ( ( ( relation_dom @ B )
= ( set_intersection2 @ ( relation_dom @ C ) @ A ) )
& ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ ( relation_dom @ B ) )
=> ( ( apply @ B @ D )
= ( apply @ C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl62,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ ( relation @ X0 )
| ~ ( function @ X0 )
| ( X2
!= ( relation_dom_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ( ( apply @ X2 @ X3 )
= ( apply @ X0 @ X3 ) )
| ~ ( in @ X3 @ ( relation_dom @ X2 ) )
| ~ ( function @ X2 )
| ~ ( relation @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t68_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl386,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( relation @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( function @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
| ( ( apply @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 )
= ( apply @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ~ ( function @ X1 )
| ~ ( relation @ X1 ) ),
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl62]) ).
thf(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( relation @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ A @ B ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl30,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( relation @ X0 )
| ( relation @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[dt_k7_relat_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl464,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( relation @ X1 )
| ~ ( function @ X1 )
| ( ( apply @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 )
= ( apply @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
| ~ ( function @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl386,zip_derived_cl30]) ).
thf(fc4_funct_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A ) )
=> ( ( relation @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ A @ B ) )
& ( function @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl31,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( function @ X0 )
| ~ ( relation @ X0 )
| ( function @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fc4_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl465,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
| ( ( apply @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 )
= ( apply @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ~ ( function @ X1 )
| ~ ( relation @ X1 ) ),
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl464,zip_derived_cl31]) ).
thf(t70_funct_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ C @ A ) ) )
=> ( ( apply @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ C @ A ) @ B )
= ( apply @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ C @ A ) ) )
=> ( ( apply @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ C @ A ) @ B )
= ( apply @ C @ B ) ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t70_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl58,plain,
( ( apply @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ sk__13 @ sk__11 ) @ sk__12 )
!= ( apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl466,plain,
( ( ( apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12 )
!= ( apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12 ) )
| ~ ( relation @ sk__13 )
| ~ ( function @ sk__13 )
| ~ ( in @ sk__12 @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ sk__13 @ sk__11 ) ) ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl465,zip_derived_cl58]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl56,plain,
relation @ sk__13,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl57,plain,
function @ sk__13,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl59,plain,
in @ sk__12 @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ sk__13 @ sk__11 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl467,plain,
( ( apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12 )
!= ( apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl466,zip_derived_cl56,zip_derived_cl57,zip_derived_cl59]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl468,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl467]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SEU223+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zdenAIzlnw true
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:03:23 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.32 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.32 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.33 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.46/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.46/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.46/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.46/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.85 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.86 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.46/0.86 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.87 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.47/0.88 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.47/0.91 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.99/1.09 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.99/1.09 % BCE start: 64
% 1.99/1.09 % BCE eliminated: 2
% 1.99/1.09 % PE start: 62
% 1.99/1.09 logic: eq
% 1.99/1.09 % PE eliminated: 2
% 1.99/1.09 % done 126 iterations in 0.113s
% 1.99/1.09 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.99/1.09 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.99/1.09
% 1.99/1.09
% 1.99/1.09 % Terminating...
% 2.00/1.24 % Runner terminated.
% 2.00/1.28 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------