%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SEU224+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:56:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.84s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 20
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 74 ( 17 unt; 3 def)
% Number of atoms : 324 ( 58 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 364 ( 140 ~; 144 |; 64 &)
% ( 7 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 2 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 4 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 135 ( 0 sgn 117 !; 18 ?; 23 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ( in(X3,X1)
& in(X3,X0) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(X0)
=> relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc4_funct_1) ).
fof(f23,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
<=> ( in(X1,X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l82_funct_1) ).
fof(f24,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
<=> ( in(X1,X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f23]) ).
fof(f36,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
<=> ( ! [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
& relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t68_funct_1) ).
fof(f48,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ relation(X0)
| relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f58,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
<~> ( in(X1,X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
fof(f59,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
<~> ( in(X1,X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f58]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
<=> ( ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
& relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).
fof(f64,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
<=> ( ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
& relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
| ! [X3] :
( ( ~ in(X3,X2)
| ( in(X3,X1)
& in(X3,X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,X1)
| ~ in(X3,X0)
| in(X3,X2) ) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( ( in(X3,X2)
| ( in(X3,X1)
& in(X3,X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X3,X1)
| ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
| X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f69,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
| ! [X3] :
( ( ~ in(X3,X2)
| ( in(X3,X1)
& in(X3,X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,X1)
| ~ in(X3,X0)
| in(X3,X2) ) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( ( in(X3,X2)
| ( in(X3,X1)
& in(X3,X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X3,X1)
| ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
| X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f68]) ).
fof(f70,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
| ! [X4] :
( ( ~ in(X4,X2)
| ( in(X4,X1)
& in(X4,X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(X4,X1)
| ~ in(X4,X0)
| in(X4,X2) ) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( ( in(X3,X2)
| ( in(X3,X1)
& in(X3,X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X3,X1)
| ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
| X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f69]) ).
fof(f71,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
| ! [X4] :
( ( ~ in(X4,X2)
| ( in(X4,X1)
& in(X4,X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(X4,X1)
| ~ in(X4,X0)
| in(X4,X2) ) ) )
& ( ( ( in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2)
| ( in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X1)
& in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X0) ) )
& ( ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2)
| ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X1)
| ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X0) ) )
| X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X3,sK0(X0,X1,X2))],[f70]) ).
fof(f73,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
| ( in(X1,X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
| ~ in(X1,X0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
| ( in(X1,X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
| ~ in(X1,X0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f73]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
( function(sK4)
& relation(sK4)
& ( in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2)))
| ( in(sK3,sK2)
& in(sK3,relation_dom(sK4)) ) )
& ( ~ in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2)))
| ~ in(sK3,sK2)
| ~ in(sK3,relation_dom(sK4)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK2),skolemize(X1,sK3),skolemize(X2,sK4)],[f74]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
| ( ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
& relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
| relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
| X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
| ( ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
& relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
| relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
| X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f84]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
| ( ! [X4] :
( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4) )
& relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
| relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
| X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
| ( ! [X4] :
( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4) )
& relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
& ( ( in(sK13(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X1,sK13(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,sK13(X1,X2)) )
| relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
| X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13]),skolemize(X3,sK13(X1,X2))],[f86]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
| ~ in(X4,X2)
| in(X4,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
| ~ in(X4,X2)
| in(X4,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).
fof(f96,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
| ~ in(X4,X1)
| ~ in(X4,X0)
| in(X4,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ relation(X0)
| relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).
fof(f109,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
function(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
relation(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f119,plain,
( in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2)))
| in(sK3,sK2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f120,plain,
( in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2)))
| in(sK3,relation_dom(sK4)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f121,plain,
( ~ in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2)))
| ~ in(sK3,sK2)
| ~ in(sK3,relation_dom(sK4)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
| relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f147,plain,
! [X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ in(X4,X1)
| ~ in(X4,X0)
| in(X4,set_intersection2(X0,X1)) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f148,plain,
! [X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ in(X4,set_intersection2(X0,X1))
| in(X4,X0) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f149,plain,
! [X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ in(X4,set_intersection2(X0,X1))
| in(X4,X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f150,plain,
! [X2,X0] :
( ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f141]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( in(X0,set_intersection2(X2,X1))
| ~ in(X0,X2)
| ~ in(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f147]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( in(X0,X1)
| ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).
tcf(c_58,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( in(X0,X2)
| ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f149]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).
tcf(c_69,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).
tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(sK3,sK2)
| ~ in(sK3,relation_dom(sK4))
| ~ in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
tcf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
( in(sK3,relation_dom(sK4))
| in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).
tcf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
( in(sK3,sK2)
| in(sK3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).
tcf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).
tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
function(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
tcf(c_101,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( set_intersection2(relation_dom(X0),X1) = relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) )
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150]) ).
tcf(c_131,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( set_intersection2(relation_dom(X0),X1) = relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) )
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_59,c_69,c_101]) ).
tcf(c_884,definition,
iPr_def_10 = relation_dom_restriction(sK4,sK2),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_885,definition,
iPr_def_11 = relation_dom(iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_886,definition,
iPr_def_12 = relation_dom(sK4),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_887,negated_conjecture,
function(sK4),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_80]) ).
tcf(c_888,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK4),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).
tcf(c_889,negated_conjecture,
( in(sK3,iPr_def_11)
| in(sK3,sK2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_884,c_885]) ).
tcf(c_890,negated_conjecture,
( in(sK3,iPr_def_12)
| in(sK3,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_886]) ).
tcf(c_891,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(sK3,iPr_def_12)
| ~ in(sK3,iPr_def_11)
| ~ in(sK3,sK2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).
tcf(c_1833,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( set_intersection2(relation_dom(sK4),X0) = relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,X0)) )
| ~ relation(sK4) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_887,c_131]) ).
tcf(c_1845,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,X0)) = set_intersection2(iPr_def_12,X0) )
| ~ relation(sK4) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1833,c_886]) ).
tcf(c_1846,plain,
! [X0: $i] : relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK4,X0)) = set_intersection2(iPr_def_12,X0),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1845,c_888]) ).
tcf(c_2062,plain,
set_intersection2(iPr_def_12,sK2) = relation_dom(iPr_def_10),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_884,c_1846]) ).
tcf(c_2067,plain,
set_intersection2(iPr_def_12,sK2) = iPr_def_11,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2062,c_885]) ).
tcf(c_2168,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(X0,iPr_def_11)
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_12)
| ~ in(X0,sK2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2067,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_2169,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(X0,sK2)
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2067,c_58]) ).
tcf(c_2170,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(X0,iPr_def_12)
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2067,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_2815,plain,
( ~ in(sK3,iPr_def_12)
| ~ in(sK3,sK2) ),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_891,c_2168]) ).
tcf(c_2822,plain,
( in(sK3,iPr_def_11)
| ~ in(sK3,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_889,c_2168]) ).
tcf(c_2916,plain,
in(sK3,sK2),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_889,c_2169]) ).
tcf(c_2957,plain,
in(sK3,iPr_def_11),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_2822,c_890,c_2815,c_2916]) ).
tcf(c_2965,plain,
~ in(sK3,iPr_def_12),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_2815,c_2815,c_2916]) ).
tcf(c_3073,plain,
in(sK3,iPr_def_12),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2957,c_2170]) ).
tcf(c_3075,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3073,c_2965]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU224+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:16:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.43 % Proving...
% 3.84/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.84/1.19 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.84/1.19 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Parsing...
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 3 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Problem Properties
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 %
% 3.84/1.19 % clauses 50
% 3.84/1.19 % conjectures 5
% 3.84/1.19 % EPR 27
% 3.84/1.19 % Horn 44
% 3.84/1.19 % unary 24
% 3.84/1.19 % binary 13
% 3.84/1.19 % lits 99
% 3.84/1.19 % lits eq 18
% 3.84/1.19 % fd_pure 0
% 3.84/1.19 % fd_pseudo 0
% 3.84/1.19 % fd_cond 1
% 3.84/1.19 % fd_pseudo_cond 6
% 3.84/1.19 % AC symbols 0
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------
% 3.84/1.19 % Current options:
% 3.84/1.19 % ------
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 %
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % ------ Proving...
% 3.84/1.19 %
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/1.19
% 3.84/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.84/1.20
% 3.84/1.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------