%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU224+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 64 ( 24 ~; 23 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 1 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l82_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)))
<=> ( in(X2,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l82_funct_1) ).
fof(t86_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2)))
<=> ( in(X1,X2)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t86_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)))
<=> ( in(X2,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,X1) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l82_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk3_0)
& function(esk3_0)
& ( ~ in(esk2_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0)))
| ~ in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
& ( in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
| in(esk2_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0))) )
& ( in(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| in(esk2_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0))) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| in(X4,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t86_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| ~ in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk2_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3)))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,lemma,
( in(X2,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0)))
| in(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0)))
| in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_7])]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU224+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 12:49:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 239
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 138
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 195
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 190
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 203
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 187
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 23
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 840
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 755
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 811
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 20
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 160
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 124
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 599
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 2806
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11619
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4074
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 22
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 475
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 31
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25965
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.066 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.067 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 4596 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------