↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU225+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  136 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  155 (  63   ~;  58   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (  10 sgn  20   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ! [B,C] :
          ( ( ~ in(B,relation_dom(A))
           => ( C = apply(A,B)
            <=> C = empty_set ) )
          & ( in(B,relation_dom(A))
           => ( C = apply(A,B)
            <=> in(ordered_pair(B,C),A) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1) ).

fof(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(A)
     => relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).

fof(fc4_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( function(relation_dom_restriction(A,B))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',fc4_funct_1) ).

fof(l82_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( function(C)
        & relation(C) )
     => ( in(B,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(C,A)))
      <=> ( in(B,A)
          & in(B,relation_dom(C)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l82_funct_1) ).

fof(t68_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( function(B)
        & relation(B) )
     => ! [C] :
          ( ( function(C)
            & relation(C) )
         => ( B = relation_dom_restriction(C,A)
          <=> ( ! [D] :
                  ( in(D,relation_dom(B))
                 => apply(B,D) = apply(C,D) )
              & relation_dom(B) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(C),A) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t68_funct_1) ).

fof(t72_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( function(C)
        & relation(C) )
     => ( in(B,A)
       => apply(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) = apply(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t72_funct_1) ).

fof(t72_funct_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( function(C)
          & relation(C) )
       => ( in(B,A)
         => apply(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) = apply(C,B) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t72_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( empty_set = C
    | apply(A,B) != C
    | in(B,relation_dom(A))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    ( empty_set != C
    | apply(A,B) = C
    | in(B,relation_dom(A))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( function(relation_dom_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[fc4_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    ( ~ in(B,C)
    | ~ in(B,relation_dom(A))
    | in(B,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(A,C)))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l82_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_97,plain,
    ( apply(B,D) = apply(A,D)
    | ~ in(D,relation_dom(A))
    | relation_dom_restriction(B,C) != A
    | ~ function(B)
    | ~ relation(B)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t68_funct_1]) ).

fof(nnf_46,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) != apply(C,B)
      & in(B,A)
      & function(C)
      & relation(C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t72_funct_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t72_funct_1_neg,plain,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,sK2),sK1) != apply(sK0,sK1)
    & in(sK1,sK2)
    & function(sK0)
    & relation(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK2),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK0)],[nnf_46]) ).

cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t72_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t72_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t72_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
    apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,sK2),sK1) != apply(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t72_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_788,plain,
    ( empty_set = apply(A,B)
    | in(B,relation_dom(A))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ( apply(A,B) = empty_set
    | in(B,relation_dom(A))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_788]) ).

cnf(c_789,negated_conjecture,
    ( function(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ function(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_72]) ).

cnf(c_296,negated_conjecture,
    function(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_789]) ).

cnf(c_300,plain,
    relation(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_790,plain,
    ( apply(B,D) = apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A),D)
    | ~ in(D,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A)))
    | relation_dom_restriction(B,C) != relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A)
    | ~ function(B)
    | ~ relation(B)
    | ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_300]) ).

cnf(c_791,plain,
    ( apply(A,D) = apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,C),D)
    | ~ in(D,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,C)))
    | relation_dom_restriction(A,B) != relation_dom_restriction(sK0,C)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_790,c_296]) ).

cnf(c_792,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,C) = apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B),C)
    | ~ in(C,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B)))
    | relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A) != relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B)
    | ~ function(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_791,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_793,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,C) = apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B),C)
    | ~ in(C,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B)))
    | relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A) != relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_792,c_104]) ).

cnf(c_794,plain,
    ( apply(sK0,A) = apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B),A)
    | ~ in(A,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B))) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_793]) ).

cnf(c_795,negated_conjecture,
    apply(sK0,sK1) != apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,sK2),sK1),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).

cnf(c_567,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,sK2))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_794,c_795]) ).

cnf(c_796,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | ~ in(A,relation_dom(sK0))
    | in(A,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B)))
    | ~ function(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_797,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | ~ in(A,relation_dom(sK0))
    | in(A,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_796,c_104]) ).

cnf(c_798,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ in(sK1,relation_dom(sK0)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_797,c_567]) ).

cnf(c_683,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK1,relation_dom(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_798,c_105]) ).

cnf(c_799,plain,
    ( empty_set != C
    | apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A),B) = C
    | in(B,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A)))
    | ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_300]) ).

cnf(c_800,plain,
    ( empty_set != C
    | apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B),A) = C
    | in(A,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,B))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_799,c_296]) ).

cnf(c_801,plain,
    ( empty_set != A
    | apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK0,sK2),sK1) = A ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_800,c_567]) ).

cnf(c_802,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != apply(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_801,c_106]) ).

cnf(c_691,negated_conjecture,
    apply(sK0,sK1) != empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_802]) ).

cnf(c_803,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,A) = empty_set
    | in(A,relation_dom(sK0))
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_104]) ).

cnf(c_804,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(sK0,sK1) = empty_set
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_803,c_683]) ).

cnf(c_805,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relation(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_804,c_691]) ).

cnf(c_787,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_805]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU225+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:53:47 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.44  % Process 1752471 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.17/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 08:53:47 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.24/0.67  
% 0.24/0.67  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.24/0.67  
% 0.24/0.67  % Proof 1 at 0.16 (+ 0.04) seconds.
% 0.24/0.67  % Length of proof is 23.
% 0.24/0.67  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.24/0.67  % Maximum clause weight is 34.000.
% 0.24/0.67  % Given clauses 112.
% 0.24/0.67  
% 0.24/0.67  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------