↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU225+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:56:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.29s 6.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   25
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   86 (  21 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  385 (  96 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  405 ( 159   ~; 169   |;  51   &)
%                                         (  12 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  141 (   0 sgn 132   !;   9   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
           => ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
            <=> X2 = empty_set ) )
          & ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
           => ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
            <=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( relation_empty_yielding(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( relation_empty_yielding(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc13_relat_1) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc4_funct_1) ).

fof(f31,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
      <=> ( in(X1,X0)
          & in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l82_funct_1) ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( function(X2)
            & relation(X2) )
         => ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
          <=> ( ! [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                 => apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
              & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t68_funct_1) ).

fof(f45,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,X0)
       => apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_funct_1) ).

fof(f46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( function(X2)
          & relation(X2) )
       => ( in(X1,X0)
         => apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f45]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
            | ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
            <=> X2 = empty_set ) )
          & ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
            | ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
            <=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
            | ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
            <=> X2 = empty_set ) )
          & ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
            | ( X2 = apply(X0,X1)
            <=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation_empty_yielding(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( relation_empty_yielding(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation_empty_yielding(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( relation_empty_yielding(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
      <=> ( in(X1,X0)
          & in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
      <=> ( in(X1,X0)
          & in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
          <=> ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
              & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
          <=> ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
              & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( function(X2)
      & relation(X2)
      & in(X1,X0)
      & apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) != apply(X2,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( function(X2)
      & relation(X2)
      & in(X1,X0)
      & apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) != apply(X2,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
            | ( ( apply(X0,X1) != X2
                | X2 = empty_set )
              & ( empty_set != X2
                | X2 = apply(X0,X1) ) ) )
          & ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
            | ( ( apply(X0,X1) != X2
                | in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) )
              & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
                | X2 = apply(X0,X1) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ( ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
          | ( in(X1,X0)
            & in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
        & ( ~ in(X1,X0)
          | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
          | in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ( ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
          | ( in(X1,X0)
            & in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
        & ( ~ in(X1,X0)
          | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
          | in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X3] :
                    ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  & apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X3] :
                    ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  & apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  & apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ( in(sK9(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
                & apply(X1,sK9(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,sK9(X1,X2)) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK9]),skolemize(X3,sK9(X1,X2))],[f95]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ( function(sK12)
    & relation(sK12)
    & in(sK11,sK10)
    & apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK12,sK10),sK11) != apply(sK12,sK11) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK10,sK11,sK12]),skolemize(X0,sK10),skolemize(X1,sK11),skolemize(X2,sK12)],[f78]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
      | apply(X0,X1) != X2
      | empty_set = X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation_empty_yielding(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X1,X0)
      | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
      | in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
      | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
      | apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    function(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    relation(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    in(sK11,sK10),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK12,sK10),sK11) != apply(sK12,sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
      | apply(X0,X1) = empty_set ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X4] :
      ( ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))
      | ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)))
      | apply(X2,X4) = apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X4) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f151]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
      | ( apply(X0,X1) = empty_set )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ relation_empty_yielding(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)))
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X2)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

tcf(c_102,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X1,X0) )
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
      | ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f169]) ).

tcf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK12,sK10),sK11) != apply(sK12,sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f159]) ).

tcf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK11,sK10),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

tcf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).

tcf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f156]) ).

tcf(c_141,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_236,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X1,X0) )
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_141]) ).

tcf(c_272,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X1,X0) )
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_947,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = relation_dom_restriction(sK12,sK10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_948,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = apply(iPr_def_10,sK11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_949,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = apply(sK12,sK11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_950,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_107]) ).

tcf(c_951,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).

tcf(c_952,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK11,sK10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_105]) ).

tcf(c_953,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_949,c_947,c_948]) ).

tcf(c_1560,plain,
    ( relation(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ relation(sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_947,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_1561,plain,
    relation(iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1560,c_951]) ).

tcf(c_1658,plain,
    ( function(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ relation(sK12)
    | ~ function(sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_947,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_1659,plain,
    function(iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1658,c_951,c_950]) ).

tcf(c_1793,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10))
      | ~ relation(sK12)
      | ~ function(sK12)
      | ~ in(X0,sK10)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sK12)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_947,c_78]) ).

tcf(c_1798,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10))
      | ~ in(X0,sK10)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sK12)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1793,c_951,c_950]) ).

tcf(c_1892,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10))
      | ( apply(sK12,X0) = empty_set )
      | ~ relation(sK12)
      | ~ function(sK12)
      | ~ in(X0,sK10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_1798]) ).

tcf(c_1897,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10))
      | ( apply(sK12,X0) = empty_set )
      | ~ in(X0,sK10) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1892,c_951,c_950]) ).

tcf(c_2081,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK12,sK10),X0) = apply(sK12,X0) )
      | ~ relation(sK12)
      | ~ function(sK12)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_947,c_272]) ).

tcf(c_2088,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(sK12,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) )
      | ~ relation(sK12)
      | ~ function(sK12)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2081,c_947]) ).

tcf(c_2089,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(sK12,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) )
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2088,c_951,c_950]) ).

tcf(c_2357,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(iPr_def_10,X0) = empty_set )
      | ( apply(sK12,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) )
      | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
      | ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_2089]) ).

tcf(c_2366,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(iPr_def_10,X0) = empty_set )
      | ( apply(sK12,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2357,c_1561,c_1659]) ).

tcf(c_3078,plain,
    ( ( apply(iPr_def_10,sK11) = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( apply(iPr_def_10,sK11) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2366,c_949]) ).

tcf(c_3079,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( empty_set = iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3078,c_948]) ).

tcf(c_3080,plain,
    empty_set = iPr_def_11,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3079,c_953]) ).

tcf(c_3099,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(iPr_def_10,X0) = iPr_def_11 )
      | ( apply(sK12,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2366,c_3080]) ).

tcf(c_3115,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10))
      | ( apply(sK12,X0) = iPr_def_11 )
      | ~ in(X0,sK10) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1897,c_3080]) ).

tcf(c_3916,plain,
    ( ( apply(iPr_def_10,sK11) = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( apply(iPr_def_10,sK11) = iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3099,c_949]) ).

tcf(c_3919,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_12 )
    | ( apply(iPr_def_10,sK11) = iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3916,c_948]) ).

tcf(c_3920,plain,
    apply(iPr_def_10,sK11) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3919,c_953]) ).

tcf(c_4176,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(sK12,X0) = iPr_def_11 )
      | ( apply(sK12,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) )
      | ~ in(X0,sK10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3115,c_2089]) ).

tcf(c_5541,plain,
    ( ( apply(sK12,sK11) = iPr_def_11 )
    | ( apply(sK12,sK11) = apply(iPr_def_10,sK11) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_952,c_4176]) ).

tcf(c_5547,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_12,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_5541,c_949,c_3920]) ).

tcf(c_5548,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5547,c_953]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU225+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/5.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:21:32 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/5.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/5.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.41  
% 0.13/5.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/5.41  
% 0.13/5.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/5.42  % Proving...
% 2.29/6.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/6.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.29/6.18  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.29/6.18  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2  sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Proving...
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % 
% 2.29/6.18  % clauses                               52
% 2.29/6.18  % conjectures                           4
% 2.29/6.18  % EPR                                   26
% 2.29/6.18  % Horn                                  49
% 2.29/6.18  % unary                                 29
% 2.29/6.18  % binary                                9
% 2.29/6.18  % lits                                  106
% 2.29/6.18  % lits eq                               19
% 2.29/6.18  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.29/6.18  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.29/6.18  % fd_cond                               1
% 2.29/6.18  % fd_pseudo_cond                        4
% 2.29/6.18  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ 
% 2.29/6.18  % Current options:
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % ------ Proving...
% 2.29/6.18  % 
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.29/6.18  
% 2.29/6.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------