↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU230+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:30 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 12.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  12   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn  11   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [A] : succ(A) = set_union2(A,singleton(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_ordinal1) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = singleton(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> C = A ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_union2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            | in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t1_boole,axiom,
    ! [A] : set_union2(A,empty_set) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',t1_boole) ).

fof(t10_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [A] : in(A,succ(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t10_ordinal1) ).

fof(t10_ordinal1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : in(A,succ(A)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t10_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    succ(A) = set_union2(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( C != A
    | in(C,B)
    | singleton(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ in(D,B)
    | in(D,C)
    | set_union2(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    set_union2(A,empty_set) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t1_boole]) ).

fof(nnf_37,plain,
    ? [A] : ~ in(A,succ(A)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t10_ordinal1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t10_ordinal1_neg,plain,
    ~ in(sK0,succ(sK0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(A,sK0)],[nnf_37]) ).

cnf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,succ(sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t10_ordinal1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,set_union2(sK0,singleton(sK0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_85]) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    ( A != B
    | in(A,singleton(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_280,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,C)
    | in(A,set_union2(B,C)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

cnf(c_226,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,singleton(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_280,c_86]) ).

cnf(c_281,plain,
    in(set_union2(A,empty_set),singleton(A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_81]) ).

cnf(c_278,plain,
    in(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_281]) ).

cnf(c_279,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_278,c_226]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU230+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/12.01  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/12.01  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/12.01  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/12.01  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/12.01  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/12.01  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/12.01  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/12.01  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:54:19 UTC 2026
% 0.08/12.01  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/12.01  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/12.01  % Process 2380523 was started by sandbox on n013,
% 0.08/12.01  % Sat Sep 26 08:54:19 2026
% 0.08/12.01  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/12.02  
% 0.08/12.02  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/12.05  
% 0.13/12.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/12.05  
% 0.13/12.05  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.13/12.05  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.13/12.05  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.13/12.05  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.13/12.05  % Given clauses 47.
% 0.13/12.05  
% 0.13/12.05  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------